Optimal design of a parallel beam system with elastic supports to minimize flexural response to harmonic loading using a combined optimization algorithm
- 91 Downloads
Mechanical systems subject to vibration are prevalent across many industries. Although potentially different in application, they sometimes share the need to minimize aspects of flexural deformation given harmonic loading and the need to consider a variety of both input and response-based constraints in the process. Practical design efforts also sometimes include the need for consideration of the optimal response of a platform-style product, including responses of multiple design variants supported by a common base structure. Harmonic problems can be especially challenging to optimize due to the likelihood that the response will be multi-modal; influenced by system natural frequencies throughout the design space. Further, analysis of these systems often involves large and complex computer models which require significant resources to execute. A harmonically loaded, platform-style parallel beam system with multiple family variants is used as an example in this work to demonstrate a proposed method for identifying an optimum in a constrained, multi-modal response environment with consideration for Expensive Black Box Functions (EBBF). The presented method proposes a combined approach where the high modality, EBBF’s domain is first surveyed for potential areas of optimal response using a method of Steepest Feasible Descent (SFD), followed by a local search in the optimal region using a more efficient direct search method. The method of SFD is a modification of the classical method of Steepest Descent, made useful for constrained models by a penalty system including both deterministic and programmatic methods. A sensitivity-based search vector method also helps to manage situations where significant difference in magnitude exists among the design variables. Evidentiary support for these key program elements is provided using standardized test functions. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by seeking a minimum flexural response for a parallel beam system subject to elastic support and response constraints.
KeywordsHarmonic optimization Parallel beam Elastic supports
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Den Hartog JP (1985) Mechanical vibrations. Courier CorporationGoogle Scholar
- Hao K, Mei L, Ripin Z (2011) Tuned vibration absorber for suppression of hand-arm vibration in electric grass trimmer. Volucella 41:494–508Google Scholar
- Laskari E, Parsopoulos K, Vrahatis M (2004) Particle swarm optimization for minimax problems. Evolutionary Computing CEC 2:1980–1987Google Scholar
- Lophaven S, Nielsen H, Sondergaard J (2002) Amatlab Kriging Toolbox. Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Technical Report No. IMM-TR-2002-12Google Scholar
- Molga M, Smutnicki C (2005) Test Functions for Optimization NeedsGoogle Scholar
- Pierson H (2012) Tunable dynamic support for resonance avoidance in bar feeders, Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- Russell D (2006) Bending modes, Damping and the sensation of sting in baseball bats, Engineering of Sport 6, 6th International Sports Engineering Conference, ISEAGoogle Scholar
- Vanderplaats GN (2007) Multidiscipline design optimization, 1st edn. Vanderplaats Research and Development, Incorporated. Colorado SpringsGoogle Scholar
- Vesterstrøm J, Thomsen R (2004) A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems, Evolutionary Computation, CEC2004. Volucella 2:1980–1987Google Scholar