Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of piezoelectric sensors adhesively bonded on trusses using a mathematical programming approach

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, piezoelectric sensors design adhesively bonded on truss elements is treated in the framework of mathematical programming. A numerical formulation based on the strength capacity of set structure, adhesive and piezoelectric sensor is proposed. Inside the formulations maximum strength capacity of the adhesive is considered as a limit value in the design. Two formulations are established to obtain the maximum strength of the set; the first one is built on the basis of finite differences and the other one on a formulation of finite elements both based on an admissible static field. The lower bound method applied to limit analysis is extended in this research to analyze trusses with sensors including the adhesive interface. Four examples are designed to assess the numerical methodologies in which the results are compared with other known data. The main contribution of this work is focused on finding the maximum coupling load that a piezoelectric sensor can read before being debonded based on the minimum size constraint of the sensor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballas RG (2007) Piezoelectric multilayer beam bending actuators: static and dynamic behavior and aspects of sensor integration. Springer Science Business Media

  • Bhalla S, Moharana S (2013) A refined shear lag model for adhesively bonded piezo-impedance transducers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 24(1):33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleyer J, Buhan P (2014) Lower bound static approach for the yield design of thick plates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 100(11):814–833

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bleyer J, Le CV, de Buhan P (2015) Locking free discontinuous finite elements for the upper bound yield design of thick plates. Int J Numer Methods Eng

  • Christiansen E (1996) Limit analysis of collapse states. Handbook Numer Anal 4:193–312

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley EF, De Luis J (1987) Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures. AIAA J 25(10):1373–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugnani R (2016) Extension of the Crawleys adhesive model to dynamically actuated piezoelectric transducers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 27(15):2112–2124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugnani R, Chang FK (2017) Analytical model of lap-joint adhesive with embedded piezoelectric transducer for weak bond detection. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 28(1):124–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fmincon (2012) Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide R2012a, The MathWorks

  • Frecker MI (2003) Recent advances in optimization of smart structures and actuators. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 14(4-5):207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleich DM (2002) Stress analysis of structural bonded joints. Delft University of Technology, TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Goland M, Reissner E (1944) The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech 11(1):A17–A27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Sharma M, Thakur N (2011) Mathematical modeling of actively controlled piezo smart structures: a review. Smart Struct Syst 8(3):275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Her SC (1999) Stress analysis of adhesively-bonded lap joints. Compos Struct 47(1):673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity (1987) ANSI/IEEE, Std. 176

  • Khan A, Kim HS, Youn BD (2017) Modeling and assessment of partially debonded piezoelectric sensor in smart composite laminates. Int J Mech Sci 131:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krabbenhoft K, Damkilde L (2002) Lower bound limit analysis of slabs with nonlinear yield criteria. Comput Struct 80(27):2043–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2007) Formulation and solution of some plasticity problems as conic programs. Int J Solids Struct 44(5):1533–1549

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon YW, Bang H (2000) The finite element method using MATLAB. CRC Press

  • Liu X, Begg DW (2000) On simultaneous optimisation of smart structures Part I: theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(1):15–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM (2006) Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive frictional materials using second order cone programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 66(4):604–634

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marinkovic D, Marinkovic Z (2012) On FEM modeling of piezoelectric actuators and sensors for thin-walled structures. Smart Struct Syst 9(5):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maunder EAW, Ramsay ACA (2012) Equilibrium models for lower bound limit analyses of reinforced concrete slabs. Comput Struct 108:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moharana S, Bhalla S (2015) Modelling of shear lag effect for piezo-elastodynamic structure for electro-mechanical imedance technique. In: SPIE Smart structures and materials nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 94352J–94352J

  • MOSEK ApS (2013) The MOSEK optimization toolbox for MATLAB manual. Version 6.0 (Revision 141). Users Manual and Reference. Available from http://www.mosek.com

  • Pereira DA, Serpa AL (2015) Bank of H filters for sensor fault isolation in active controlled flexible structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 60:678–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phung-Van P, De Lorenzis L, Thai CH, Abdel-Wahab M, Nguyen-Xuan H (2015) Analysis of laminated composite plates integrated with piezoelectric sensors and actuators using higher-order shear deformation theory and isogeometric finite elements. Comput Mater Sci 96:495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoni-Bottai G, Giurgiutiu V (2012) Exact shear-lag solution for guided waves tuning with piezoelectric-wafer active sensors. AIAA J 50(11):2285–2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirohi J, Chopra I (2000) Fundamental understanding of piezoelectric strain sensors. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 11(4):246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco HA (2012) Technical Report. Numerical limit analysis of rigid plastic structures. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2920.9447

  • Tinoco HA (2014) Upper bound method for determining the collapse load of concrete slabs with conic programming. In: Proceedings of 14th Pan American congress of applied mechanics (PACAM XIV). Santiago de Chile, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.5000.1920

  • Tinoco HA (2016) Numerical limit analysis of reinforced concrete slabs using a dual approach and conic programming. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1047–1423

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco HA, Serpa AL (2011) Bonding influence in the electromechanical (EM) admittance of piezoelectric sensors bonded to structures based on EMI technique. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on dynamic problems of MechanicsXIV DINAME, pp 335–344. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.5150.4967

  • Tinoco HA, Serpa AL (2012) Voltage relations for debonding detection of piezoelectric sensors with segmented electrode. Mech Syst Signal Process 31:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco HA, Serpa AL, Ramos AM (2010) Numerical study of the effects of bonding layer properties on electrical signatures of piezoelectric sensors. Mecánica Computacional 29(86):8391–8409

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinoco HA, Rosas-Bastidas DA (2016) Experimental study of the debonding effects on the electromechanical impedance of piezo wafer active sensors. In: Third international conference on advanced mechatronics, design, and manufacturing technology (AMDM 2016). Cali, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3346.2162

  • Toklu YC, Arditi D (2014) Smart trusses for space applications. In: 14th ASCE international conference on engineering, science, construction and operations in challenging environments. Earth and Space, pp 27–29

  • Tong L, Steven GP (1999) Analysis and design of structural bonded joints. Univ. of Sydney, New South Wales

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B, Jiang JS (2004) Integrated optimization of structure and control for piezoelectric intelligent trusses with uncertain placement of actuators and sensors. Comput Mech 33(5):406–412

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Bottai-Santoni G, Giurgiutiu V (2010) Shear lag solution for tuning ultrasonic piezoelectric wafer active sensors with applications to Lamb wave array imaging. Int J Eng Sci 48(10):848–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to recognize the work carried out by the mechanical engineering student Luis Daniel Meza for his help in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hector A. Tinoco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tinoco, H.A. Modeling of piezoelectric sensors adhesively bonded on trusses using a mathematical programming approach. Struct Multidisc Optim 58, 903–918 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1933-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1933-3

Keywords

Navigation