Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-objective optimization of a composite stiffened panel for hybrid design of stiffener layout and laminate stacking sequence

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a two-level approximation method for multi-objective optimization of a composite stiffened panel. The purpose is to seek the minimum structural mass and maximum fundamental frequency subject to given displacement constraints and manufacturing limitations. The design variables are the stiffener layout, and laminate stacking sequences for stiffeners and the panel skin. By introducing the concept of ground structure in both stiffener layout and laminate stacking sequence, the design problem is formulated with mixed discrete and continuous variables. Two types of discrete variables represent the existence of each stiffener and the existence of each ply in the laminate, respectively, with continuous ones for ply thicknesses. Considering the objectives are of different dimensions, a weighted min-max objective function is defined and minimized. The problem is firstly made explicit with branched multipoint approximate functions. Genetic algorithm (GA) is then adopted to optimize two types of discrete variables, determining which stiffeners/layers are deleted or retained. For fitness calculation in GA, a second-level approximation is built to optimize continuous ply thicknesses of the necessary layers that are retained. By giving different initial designs of stiffener layout and laminate stacking sequences, reasonable optimization results, which are tradeoffs between the considered two objectives, are obtained as design options. From the number of required structural analysis, it shows that the proposed method has a good efficiency in seeking rational solutions, which are tradeoffs between conflicting objectives and also feasible designs satisfying all considered constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abachizadeh M, Tahani M (2009) An ant colony optimization approach to multi-objective optimal design of symmetric hybrid laminates for maximum fundamental frequency and minimum cost. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(4):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alinia MM (2005) A study into optimization of stiffeners in plates subjected to shear loading. Thin-Walled Struct 43(5):845–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An H, Huang H (2017) Topology and sizing optimization for frame structures with a two-level approximation method. AIAA J 55(3):1044–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An H, Chen S, Huang H (2015a) Laminate stacking sequence optimization with strength constraints using two-level approximations and adaptive genetic algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(4):903–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An H, Chen S, Huang H (2015b) Improved genetic algorithm with two-level approximation method for laminate stacking sequence optimization by considering engineering requirements. Math Probl Eng 2015:1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • An H, Xian K, Huang H (2016a) Actuator placement optimization for adaptive trusses using a two-level multipoint approximation method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(1):29–48

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • An H, Chen S, Huang H (2016b) Optimal design of composite sandwich structures by considering multiple structure cases. Compos Struct 152:676–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora JS (2004) Introduction to optimum design. Elsevier, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedair OK (1997) Influence of stiffener location on the stability of stiffened plates under compression and in-plane bending. Int J Mech Sci 39(1):33–49

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Huang H (2010) Optimum design of a space frame and its application in satellite structure. J Spacecr Rocket 47(6):1063–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Lin Z, An H, Huang H, Kong C (2013) Stacking sequence optimization with genetic algorithm using a two-level approximation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(4):795–805

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Faggiani A, Falzon BG (2007) Optimization strategy for minimizing damage in postbuckling stiffened panels. AIAA J 45(10):2520–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury C, Braibant V (1986) Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23(3):409–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiasi H, Pasini D, Lessard L (2009) Optimum stacking sequence design of composite materials Part I: constant stiffness design. Compos Struct 90(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herencia JE, Weaver PM, Friswell MI (2007) Optimization of long anisotropic laminated fiber composite panels with T-shaped stiffeners. AIAA J 45(10):2497–2509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Xia RW (1995) Two-level multipoint constraint approximation concept for structural optimization. Struct Optim 9(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Ke W, Xia RW (1998) Numerical accuracy of the multi-point approximation and its application in structural synthesis. In: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, USA, September 02 – 04, 1998

  • Huang H, Wang Y, Lian H (2003) Comparisons of several multi-point approximation methods used in structural topology optimization. In: The Chinese conference on computational mechanics ‘2003, Beijing, China, October 1, 2003

  • Kang JH, Kim CG (2005) Minimum-weight design of compressively loaded composite plates and stiffened panels for postbuckling strength by genetic algorithm. Compos Struct 69(2):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch U (1989) Optimal topologies of structures. Appl Mech Rev 42(8):223–239

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzi L, Giavotto V (2006) Post-buckling optimization of composite stiffened panels: computations and experiments. Compos Struct 73(2):208–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Riche R, Haftka RT (1995) Improved genetic algorithm for minimum thickness composite laminate design. Compos Eng 5(2):143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Haftka RT, Akgun MA, Todoroki A (2000) Permutation genetic algorithm for stacking sequence design of composite laminates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186(2-4):357–372

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra S, Haftka RT, Gurdal Z (1993) Design of a blade stiffened composite panel by a genetic algorithm. AIAA Paper 93-1584. In: 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, La Jolla, CA. p 2418–36

  • Nagendra S, Jestin D, Gürdal Z, Haftka RT, Watson LT (1996) Improved genetic algorithm for the design of stiffened composite panels. Comput Struct 58(3):543–555

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki M (1995) Genetic algorithm for topology optimization of trusses. Comput Struct 57(2):219–225

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rikards R, Abramovich H, Kalnins K, Auzins J (2006) Surrogate modeling in design optimization of stiffened composite shells. Compos Struct 73(2):244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seresta O, Abdalla MM, Gurdal Z (2005) Optimal design of laminated composite plates for maximum post buckling strength. AIAA Paper 2005-2128. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Austin, Texas. p. 1–12

  • Todoroki A, Sekishiro M (2008a) Stacking sequence optimization to maximize the buckling load of blade-stiffened panels with strength constraints using the iterative fractal branch and bound method. Compos Part B 39(5):842–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todoroki A, Sekishiro M (2008b) Modified efficient global optimization for a hat-stiffened composite panel with buckling constraint. AIAA J 46(9):2257–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker M (2002) The effect of stiffeners on the optimal ply orientation and buckling load of rectangular laminated plates. Comput Struct 80(27):2229–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Guo S, Chang N, Yang W (2010) Optimum buckling design of composite stiffened panels using ant colony algorithm. Compos Struct 92(3):712–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Tian K, Hao P, Cai Y, Li Y, Sun Y (2015) Hybrid analysis and optimization of hierarchical stiffened plates based on asymptotic homogenization method. Compos Struct 132:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K (1996) Two-level optimization technique of composite laminate panels by genetic algorithms. AIAA Paper 96-1539. In: 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Salt Lake City, UT. p 1882–7

  • Yong M, Falzon B, Iannucci L (2008) On the application of genetic algorithms for optimising composites against impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 35(11):1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11672016), which the authors gratefully acknowledge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haichao An.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, H., Chen, S. & Huang, H. Multi-objective optimization of a composite stiffened panel for hybrid design of stiffener layout and laminate stacking sequence. Struct Multidisc Optim 57, 1411–1426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1918-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1918-2

Keywords

Navigation