Analytical target cascading (ATC) has been extended to the probabilistic formulation to deal with the hierarchical multilevel optimization problem under uncertainty. However, only aleatory uncertainties can be handled by the probabilistic theory. Considering both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties exist in engineering design, a mixed uncertainty based analytical target cascading (MUATC) approach is proposed in this paper. The probability distribution and interval are used to represent the aleatory uncertainties and epistemic uncertainties, respectively. To figure out the mixed uncertainty propagation(MUP) problem, the reliability index approach based MUP (RIA-MUP) and performance measurement approach based MUP (PMA-MUP) are proposed firstly. Based on PMA-MUP, the MUATC method is established. MUATC firstly decouples the mixed uncertainty all-in-one (MUAIO) problem into deterministic optimization problem and mixed uncertainty analysis, and then hierarchically decomposes them into subproblems. All-in-one (AIO) mixed uncertainty analysis and hierarchically mixed uncertainty analysis methods are established to calculate the characteristic of the interrelated responses and shared variables. The accuracy and effectiveness of MUATC are demonstrated with three examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51675525.
Ahn J, Kwon J (2006) An efficient strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization using BLISS. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailing RJ, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1994) An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization. Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE), HamptonGoogle Scholar
Li Y, Jiang P, Gao L, Shao X (2013) Sequential optimisation and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary design optimisation under hybrid uncertainty of randomness and fuzziness. J Eng Des 24:363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu P, Der Kiureghian A (1991) Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Struct Saf 9:161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu H, Chen W, Kokkolaras M et al (2006) Probabilistic analytical target cascading: a moment matching formulation for multilevel optimization under uncertainty. J Mech Des 128:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister CD, Simpson TW (2003) Multidisciplinary robust design optimization of an internal combustion engine. J Mech Des 125:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos Z, Zhou J (2006) A design optimization method using evidence theory. J Mech Des 128:901–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaidis E, Chen S, Cudney H, Haftka RT, Rosca R (2004) Comparison of probability and possibility for design against catastrophic failure under uncertainty. J Mech Des 126:386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouyang Q, Chen X, Yao W (2014) Sequential probabilistic analytical target cascading method for hierarchical multilevel optimization under uncertainty. Struct Multidiscip Optim 49:267–280MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmanabhan D, Batill S (2002) Reliability based optimization using approximations with applications to multi-disciplinary system design. In: 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. AIAA-2002-0449Google Scholar
Padula SL, Alexandrov N, Green LL (1996) MDO test suite at nasa langley research center. In: 6th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. AIAA-1996-4028Google Scholar