Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 1317–1327 | Cite as

Topology optimization of thermal actuator and its support using the level set based multiple–type boundary method and sensitivity analysis based on constrained variational principle

RESEARCH PAPER

Abstract

Thermal actuator uses thermal expansion of an elastic body to produce motion at its output port. It needs to accumulate and amplify small local thermal expansion to ensure its output displacement is large enough. Also, its support should constrain the thermal expansion in irrelevant directions and steer the output displacement to a required direction. In the present paper, the task of designing a thermal actuator is formulated as a topology optimization problem. The design variables include two types of boundaries: the free boundary and the Dirichlet boundary. The optimization problem is solved by using a level set based multiple–type boundary method. Two level set functions are used to represent a thermal actuator and its two types of boundaries. Evolution of the two boundaries is modeled by two independent Hamilton–Jacobi equations. In order to analyze the shape derivatives of the two boundaries, the constrained variational principle is employed to explicitly include the Dirichlet boundary condition into the weak form equation of linear thermoelasticity. Numerical examples in two dimensions are investigated.

Keywords

Thermal actuator Support Level set Constrained variational principle Topology optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51575203, 51705165), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei province of China (Grant No. 2017CFA044), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei province of China (Grant No. 2015CFB443). The insightful comments of the reviewers are cordially appreciated.

References

  1. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2002) A level-set method for shape optimization. C R Acad Sci Paris, Serie I(334):1–6MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194:363–393MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhl T (2002) Simultaneous topology optimization of structure and supports. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:336–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comtois JH, Bright VM (1997) Applications for surface-micromachined polysilicon thermal actuators and arrays. Sens Actuators A Phys 58:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi KK, Kim NH (2005) Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández-Méndez S, Huerta A (2004) Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1257–1275MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao T, Zhang W (2010) Topology optimization involving thermo-elastic stress loads. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42:725–738MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo X, Gu YX, Zhao K (2004) Adjoint shape sensitivity analysis based on generalized variational principle. Acta Mechanica Sinica 36:287–295Google Scholar
  9. Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong WL (2014) Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically new moving morphable components based framework. J Appl Mech 81:081009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heo S, Yoon GH, Kim YY (2008) Minimum scale controlled topology optimization and experimental test of a micro thermal actuator. Sens Actuators A Phys 141:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang G, Shim H, Kim Y (2009) Optimization of support locations of beam and plate structures under self-weight by using a sprung structure model. J Mech Des 131:021005–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonsmann J, Sigmund O, Bouwstra S (1999) Compliant thermal microactuators. Sens Actuators A Phys 76:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Judy JW, Tamagawa T, Polla DL (1990) Surface micromachined linear thermal microactuator. In: International electron devices meeting, pp 629–632Google Scholar
  14. Li Y, Saitou K, Kikuchi N (2004) Topology optimization of thermally actuated compliant mechanisms considering time-transient effect. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:1317–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luo Z, Tong LY (2008) A level set method for shape and topology optimization of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Meth Eng 76:862–892MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo Z, Tong LY, Ma HT (2009) Shape and topology optimization for electrothermomechanical microactuators using level set methods. J Comput Phys 228:3173–3181MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical Optimization. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Pedersen CB, Buhl T, Sigmund O (2001) Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:2683–2750CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Riethmuller W, Benecke W (1988) Thermally excited silicon microactuators. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 35:758–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodrigues H, Fernandes P (1995) A material based model for topology optimization of thermoelastic structures. Int J Numer Meth Eng 38:1951–1965MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Sardan O, Petersen DH, Mølhave K, Sigmund O, Bøggild P (2008) Topology optimized electrothermal polysilicon microgrippers. Microelectron Eng 85:1096–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sigmund O (2001a) Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization - part I: One-material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:6577–6604CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Sigmund O (2001b) Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization - part II: Two-material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:6605–6627CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Sigmund O (2001c) Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization. Part I: One material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(49–50):6577–6604CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang MY, Wang XM, Guo DM (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:227–246MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang XM, Wang MY, Guo DM (2004) Structural shape and topology optimization in a level-set framework of region representation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 27:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xia Q, Shi T (2016a) Topology optimization of compliant mechanism and its support through a level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:359–375MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xia Q, Shi T (2016b) Optimization of structures with thin-layer functional device on its surface through a level set based multiple-type boundary method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 311:56–70MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xia Q, Wang MY (2008) Topology optimization of thermoelastic structures using level set method. Comput Mech 42:837–857CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Xia Q, Shi TL, Liu SY, Wang MY (2012) A level set solution to the stress-based structural shape and topology optimization. Comput Struct 90–91:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia Q, Wang MY, Shi TL (2014) A level set method for shape and topology optimization of both structure and support of continuum structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 272:340–353MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Xia Q, Wang MY, Shi T (2015) Topology optimization with pressure load through a level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:177–195MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoon GH (2012) Topological layout design of electro-fluid-thermal-compliant actuator. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 209–212:28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang WH, Zhao LY, Cai SY (2015) Shape optimization of dirichlet boundaries based on weighted b-spline finite cell method and level-set function. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:359– 383MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang WS, Yuan J, Zhang J, Guo X (2016a) A new topology optimization approach based on moving morphable components (MMC) and the ersatz material model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53:1243–1260MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang W, Yang WY, Zhou JH, Guo X (2016b) Structural topology optimization through explicit boundary evolution. J Appl Mech 84:011011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang WS, Chen JS, Zhu XF, Zhou JH, Xue DC, Lei X, Guo X (2017) Explicit three dimensional topology optimization via moving morphable void (MMV) approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 322:590–614MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ (2005) The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, sixth Edition. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu JH, Zhang WH (2006) Maximization of structural natural frequency with optimal support layout. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhu JH, Zhang WH (2010) Integrated layout design of supports and structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:557–569CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations