Abstract
This paper presents an efficient method to improve the minimum fatigue safety factor in a complicated mechanical system using fatigue based shape optimization. The effect of shape optimization on the probabilistic response of the minimum fatigue safety factor was studied as well. The example used for this purpose is the oil sump of a four wheel drive vehicle carrying a differential case by four bolt connections. The conventional method for such a design improvement problem is based on the stress analysis in ABAQUS and the fatigue analysis in FEMFAT. In the proposed method, a submodel of the original ABAQUS finite element model was built for OPTISTRUCT using a MATLAB script. Fatigue based shape optimization for the most critical differential case bolt connection region was performed in OPTISTRUCT. The optimum shape found using the submodel was tested by replacing it back into the original ABAQUS and FEMFAT models. The proposed method was successful in finding out efficiently the optimum shape that maximizes the fatigue life. Probabilistic analysis was performed for the minimum fatigue safety factor considering the statistical variation of the clamping forces of the four differential case bolts using Optimal Latin Hypercube design of experiment, response surface model and Monte Carlo simulation techniques in ISIGHT. The design with the optimized shape was found to be robust against the variation of the clamping forces of the four differential case bolts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME (2001) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. Wiley, New York
Das R, Jones R (2009) Fatigue life enhancement of structures using shape optimization. Theor Appl Fract Mech 52:165–179
Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO (1996) Structural reliability methods. Wiley, Chichester
Giglio M (1999) FEM submodelling fatigue analysis of a complex helicopter component. Int J Fatigue 21:445–455
Hyder MJ, Asif M (2008) Optimization of location and size of opening in a pressure vessel cylinder using ANSYS. Eng Fail Anal 15:1–19
ISIGHT FD version 3.0 Component Guide (2008) Engineous Software
Kaya N, Karen I, Ozturk F (2010) Re-design of a failed clutch fork using topology and shape optimization by the response surface method. Mater Des 31:3008–3014
Krishnapillai K, Jones R (2009) Three-dimensional structural design optimisation based on fatigue implementing a genetic algorithm and a non-similitude crack growth law. Finite Elem Anal Des 45:132–146
Krishnapillai K, Jones R, Peng D (2009) Three-dimensional fatigue-based structural design optimisation of fuel flow vent holes. Eng Fail Anal 16:371–390
Lee D, Woo Y, Lee S, Han C (2008) Design consideration of the nonlinear specifications in the automotive body. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:851–861
McDonald M, Heller M (2004) Robust shape optimization of notches for fatigue-life extension. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 28:55–68
Murphy A, Price M, Gibson A, Armstrong CG (2004) Efficient nonlinear idealisations of aircraft fuselage panels in compression. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:1977–1993
Pellissetti MF, Schueller GI (2006) On general purpose software in structural reliability—an overview. Struct Saf 28:3–16
Sachdeva SK, Nair PB, Keane AJ (2007) On using deterministic FEA software to solve problems in stochastic structural mechanics. Comput Struct 85:277–290
Shim HJ, Kim JK (2009) Cause of failure and optimization of a V-belt pulley considering fatigue life uncertainty in automotive applications. Eng Fail Anal 16:1955–1963
Stefanou G (2009) The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future. Comput Methods Appl Math 198:1031–1051
Thacker BH, Riha DS, Fitch SHK, Huyse LJ, Pleming JB (2006) Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software. Struct Saf 28:83–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozturk, U.E. Efficient method for fatigue based shape optimization of the oil sump carrying a differential case in four wheel drive vehicles. Struct Multidisc Optim 44, 823–830 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0678-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0678-z