Skip to main content
Log in

A weak variant of Hindman’s Theorem stronger than Hilbert’s Theorem

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hirst investigated a natural restriction of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem—called Hilbert’s Theorem—and proved it equivalent over \(\mathbf {RCA}_0\) to the Infinite Pigeonhole Principle for all colors. This gave the first example of a natural restriction of Hindman’s Theorem provably much weaker than Hindman’s Theorem itself. We here introduce another natural restriction of Hindman’s Theorem—which we name the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem with apartness—and prove it to be provable from Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs and strictly stronger than Hirst’s Hilbert’s Theorem. The lower bound is obtained by a direct combinatorial implication from the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem with apartness to the Increasing Polarized Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs introduced by Dzhafarov and Hirst. In the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem homogeneity is required only for finite sums of adjacent elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blass, A.: Some questions arising from Hindman’s Theorem. Sci. Math. Jpn. 62, 331–334 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Blass, A.R., Hirst, J.L., Simpson, S.G.: Logical analysis of some theorems of combinatorics and topological dynamics. In: Logic and Combinatorics (Arcata, Calif., 1985), Contemp. Math., vol. 65, pp. 125–156. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1987)

  3. Carlucci, L.: “Weak yet strong” restrictions of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. (to appear)

  4. Carlucci, L., Kołodziejczyk, L. A., Lepore, F., Zdanowski, K.: New bounds on the strength of some restrictions of Hindman’s Theorem. In: Kari, J., Manea, F., Petre, I. (eds.) Unveiling Dynamics and Complexity, 13th Conference Computability in Europe 2017 (Turku, Finland, June 12–16, 2017), Springer, pp. 210–220 (2017)

  5. Cholak, P., Jockusch, C.G., Slaman, T.: On the strength of Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs. J. Symb. Log. 66(1), 1–55 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chong, C.T., Lempp, S., Yang, Y.: On the role of the collection principle for \(\Sigma ^0_2\) formulas in second-order reverse mathematics. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 1093–1100 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chong, C.T., Slaman, T.A., Yang, Y.: The metamathematics of the Stable Ramsey’s Theorem for Pairs. J. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 863–892 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dzhafarov, D.D., Hirst, J.L.: The polarized Ramsey’s theorem. Arch. Math. Log. 48(2), 141–157 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dzhafarov, D., Jockusch, C., Solomon, R., Westrick, L.B.: Effectiveness of Hindman’s Theorem for bounded sums. In: Day, A., Fellows, M., Greenberg, N., Khoussainov, B., Melnikov, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computability and Complexity (in Honour of Rod Downey’s 60th birthday). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 134–142. Springer (2017)

  10. Hindman, N.: The existence of certain ultrafilters on \(N\) and a conjecture of Graham and Rothschild. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 36(2), 341–346 (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hindman, N.: Finite sums from sequences within cells of a partition of N. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 17, 1–11 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hindman, N., Leader, I., Strauss, D.: Open problems in partition regularity. Comb. Probab. Comput. 12, 571–583 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirst, J.: Hilbert vs Hindman. Arch. Math. Log. 51(1–2), 123–125 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kołodziejczyk, L.A., Michalewski, H., Pradic, P., Skrzypczak, M.: The logical strength of Büchi’s decidability theorem. In: Reigner, L., Talbot, J.-M. (eds.) Proceedings of Computer Science Logic 2016, CSL 2016, August 29 to September 1, 2016, Marseille, France. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, pp. 36:1–36:16. Dagstuhl Publishing (2016)

  15. Montalbán, A.: Open questions in reverse mathematics. Bull. Symb. Log. 17(3), 431–454 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Patey, L., Yokoyama, K.: The proof theoretic strength of Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs. Preprint (2016)

  17. Simpson, S.G.: Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic. Perspectives in Logic, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Carlucci.

Additional information

The work was done partially while the author was visiting the Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore in 2016. The visit was supported by the Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlucci, L. A weak variant of Hindman’s Theorem stronger than Hilbert’s Theorem. Arch. Math. Logic 57, 381–389 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-017-0576-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-017-0576-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation