Immigrant category of admission and the earnings of adults and children: how far does the apple fall?
- 434 Downloads
Immigrants in many Western countries have experienced poor economic outcomes. This has led to a lack of integration of child immigrants (the 1.5 generation) and the second generation in some countries. However, in Canada, child immigrants and the second generation have on average integrated very well economically. We examine the importance of Canada’s admission classes to determine if there is an earnings benefit of the selection under the economic classes to (1) the Adult Arrival immigrants and (2) the Child Arrival immigrants (1.5 generation) once old enough to enter the labour market. We employ unique administrative data on landing records matched with subsequent income tax records that also allows for the linking of the records of Adult Arrival parents and their Child Arrival children. We find, relative to the Family Class, the Adult Arrivals in the Skilled Worker category have earnings that are 29% higher for men and 38% higher for women. These differences persist even after controlling for detailed personal characteristics such as education and language fluency at 21% for men and 27% for women. Child Arrival immigrants landing in the Skilled Worker Class have earnings advantages (as adults) over their Family Class counterparts of 17% for men and 21% for women. These Child Arrival Skilled Worker advantages remain at 9% for men and 14% for women after controlling for child characteristics, the Principal Applicant parent’s characteristics, and the parent’s subsequent income in Canada.
KeywordsCanada Immigration Earnings 1.5 generation Second generation Child immigrants Integration Points system Skilled workers Economic class
JEL classificationJ15 J13 J31 J61 J62
We would like to thank Klaus F. Zimmermann (the Editor), three anonymous reviewers, Manish Pandey, Frances Woolley, and seminar participants at Dalhousie University, Queen’s University, University of Waterloo, and the 2015 Canadian Economics Association meetings for their helpful comments. We would also like to thank Athanase Barayandema, Rose Evra, Ian Marrs, Scott McLeish, Michael Wendt, and Xiaoyi Yan for their help with the IMDB data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Beach C, Green A, Worswick C (2011) Toward improving Canada’s skilled immigration policy: an evaluation approach. C.D. Howe, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Bratsberg B, Raaum O, Roed K (2011) Educating children of immigrants: closing the gap in Norwegian schools. IZA discussion papers 6138 institute for the study of labor (IZA), NovemberGoogle Scholar
- Card D, DiNardo J, Estes E (2000) The more things change: immigrants children of immigrants in the 1940s, 1970s, and the 1990s. In: Borjas G (ed) Issues in the economics of immigration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 227–270Google Scholar
- Corak M (2012) Age at immigration and the education outcomes of children. In: Karmela Liebkind Masten A, Hernandez DJ (eds) Realizing the potential of immigrant youth, pp 90–116Google Scholar
- Nielsen HS, Rosholm M, Smith N, Husted L (2003) The school-to-work transition of 2nd generation immigrants in Denmark. J Popul Econ 26(4):55–786Google Scholar
- Sweetman A, van Ours JC (2015) Immigration: what about the children and grandchildren? . In: Chiswick B, Miller P (eds) Handbook of the economics of international migration, vol 1b. Elsevier/North-Holand, Amsterdam, pp 1141–1191Google Scholar