Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 681–721 | Cite as

Inter-firm mobility and return migration patterns of skilled guest workers

  • Briggs Depew
  • Peter Norlander
  • Todd A. Sørensen
Original Paper

Abstract

Two concerns central to the debate over skilled guest worker programs in the USA are that (1) guest workers are restricted from inter-firm mobility and are “effectively tied” to their firms, and (2) guest workers provide cheap and immobile labor that crowds out natives, especially during times of heightened unemployment. We address these concerns by using a unique dataset of employee records from six large Indian IT firms operating in the USA. We find that the guest workers in our sample exhibit a significant amount of inter-firm mobility that varies over both the earnings distribution and the business cycle. We also find that these workers exit the USA during periods of heightened unemployment. These findings provide new evidence on the implications of the institutional features and debate surrounding guest worker programs.

Keywords

Guest workers Skilled migration Work mobility Return migration 

JEL Classification

J42 J61 J62 

References

  1. Abramitzky R, Boustan LP, Eriksson K (2014) A nation of immigrants: assimilation and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. J Polit Econ 122(3):467–506. doi:10.1086/675805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee P (2006) Indian information technology workers in the United States: the H-1B visa, flexible production, and the racialization of labor. Crit Sociol 32(2–3):425–445. doi:10.1163/156916306777835295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banerjee P (2009) Indian IT workers in the U.S.: race, gender, and state in the making of immigrant labor. Dissertation, Syracuse UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjas GJ (2001) Does immigration grease the wheels of the labor market? Brook Pap Eco Ac 2001(1):69–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borjas GJ (2009) Immigration in high-skill labor markets: the impact of foreign students on the earnings of doctorates. In: Freeman RB, Goroff D (eds) Science and engineering careers in the United States: an analysis of markets and employment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 131–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borjas GJ, Doran KB (2012) The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians. Q J Econ 127(3):1143–1203. doi:10.1093/qje/qjs015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bound J, Braga B, Golden JM, Khanna G (2015) Recruitment of foreigners in the market for computer scientists in the US. J Labor Econ 33(S1):S187–S223. doi:10.1086/679020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdett K, Mortensen DT (1998) Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. Int Econ Rev 39(2):257–273. doi:10.2307/2527292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cadena BC, Kovak BK (2016) Immigrants equilibrate local labor markets: evidence from the Great Recession. Am Econ J: Appl Econ 8(1):257–290. doi:10.1257/app.20140095 Google Scholar
  10. Chakravartty P (2006) Symbolic analysts or indentured servants? Indian high-tech migrants in America’s information economy. Knowl, Technol Policy 19(3):27–43. doi:10.1007/s12130-006-1028-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Depew B, Sorensen TA (2013) The elasticity of labor supply to the firm over the business cycle. Labour Econ 24:196–204. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2013.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devereux PJ, Hart RA (2006) Real wage cyclicality of job stayers, within-company job movers, and between-company job movers. Ind Labor Relat Rev 60(1):105–119. doi:10.1177/001979390606000106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorning J, Fanning C (2012) Gaming the system: guest worker visa programs and professional and technical workers in the U.S. Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC. http://dpeaflcio.org/wp-content/uploads/Gaming-the-System-2012-Revised.pdf
  14. Dube A, Freeman E, Reich M (2010) Employee replacement costs. IRLE Working Paper 201-10, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kc29981
  15. Dustmann C (2003) Return migration, wage differentials, and the optimal migration duration. Eur Econ Rev 47(2):353–369. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00184-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farber HS (1994) The analysis of inter-firm worker mobility. J Labor Econ 12 (4):554–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flood S, King M, Ruggles S, Warren JR (2015) Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: version 4.0. [machine-readable database]Google Scholar
  18. Friedman TL (2007) The world is at: a brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60(1):126–142Google Scholar
  20. Hatch O (2000) American competitiveness in the 21st century. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Report 106-260. U.S Senate, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Hira R (2010a) Bridge to immigration or cheap temporary labor? The H-1B & L-1 visa programs are a source of both. Briefing Paper 257. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.epi.org/publication/bp257/ Google Scholar
  22. Hira R (2010b) The H-1B and L-1 visa programs: out of control. Briefing Paper 280. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.epi.org/publication/bp280/ Google Scholar
  23. Hirsch B, Jahn EJ (2015) Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants? Ind Labor Relat Rev 68(3):501–528. doi:10.1177/0019793915572124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirsch B, Schank T, Schnabel C (2010) Differences in labor supply to monopsonistic firms and the gender pay gap: an empirical analysis using linked employer-employee data from Germany. J Labor Econ 28(2):291–330. doi:10.1086/651208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirsch B, Jahn EJ, Schnabel C (2013) The cyclical behaviour of employers’ monopsony power and workers. IZA Discussion Paper 7776Google Scholar
  26. Hotchkiss JL, Quispe-Agnoli M (2013) The expected impact of state immigration legislation on labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manag 32(1):34–59. doi:10.1002/pam.21664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunt J (2010) Skilled immigrants’ contribution to innovation and entrepreneurship in the United States. In: Open for business: migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M (2010) How much does immigration boost innovation? Am Econ J: Macroecon 2(2):31–56. doi:10.1257/mac.2.2.31 Google Scholar
  29. Hyde A (1998) Silicon valley’s high-velocity labor market. J Appl Corp Financ 11(2):28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kandilov AMG (2008) Labor market outcomes of immigrants in the United States. Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr SP, Kerr WR, Lincoln WF (2015) Skilled immigration and the employment structures of US firms. J Labor Econ 33(S1):S147–S186. doi:10.1086/678986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerr W, Lincoln W (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. J Labor Econ 28(3):473–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lofstrom M, Hayes JJ (2011) H-1Bs: How do they stack up to US born workers? IZA Discussion Paper 6259Google Scholar
  34. Loury LD (2006) Some contacts are more equal than others: Informal networks, job tenure, and wages. J Labor Econ 24(2):299–318. doi:10.1086/499974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Manning A (2011) Chapter 11 - imperfect competition in the labor market. In: Card D, Ashenfelter O (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 4. Part B, Elsevier, pp 973–1041. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02409-9
  36. Matloff N (2003) On the need for reform of the H-1B non-immigrant work visa in computer-related occupations. Univ Mich J Law Reform 36(4):815–914Google Scholar
  37. Matloff N (2013) Immigration and the tech industry: as a labour shortage remedy, for innovation, or for cost savings? Migr Lett 10(2):210–227Google Scholar
  38. Mithas S, Lucas HC (2010) Are foreign IT workers cheaper? U.S. visa policies and compensation of information technology professionals. Manage Sci 56(5):745–765. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mukhopadhyay S, Oxborrow D (2012) The value of an employment-based green card. Demography 49(1):219–237. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0079-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naidu S, Nyarko Y, Wang SY (Forthcoming) Monopsony power in migrant labor markets: evidence from the United Arab Emirates. J Pol EconGoogle Scholar
  41. Norlander P (2014) Organizing migrations: people and knowledge flows in the global economy. Dissertation, University of California Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  42. Ransom MR, Sims DP (2010) Estimating the firm’s labor supply curve in a “new monopsony” framework: school teachers in Missouri. J Labor Econ 28(2):331–356. doi:10.1086/649904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruggles S, Alexander JT, Genadek K, Goeken R, Schroeder MB, Sobek M (2010) Integrated public use microdata series: Version 5.0 [machine-readable database]Google Scholar
  44. Sjaastad LA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70(5):80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solon G, Whately W, Stevens AH (1997) Wage changes and intrafirm job mobility over the business cycle: two case studies. Ind Labor Relat Rev 50(3):402–415. doi:10.1177/001979399705000302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webber DA (2015) Firm market power and the earnings distribution. Labour Econ 35:123–134. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2015.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yueh LY (2008) Do social networks increase labour supply elasticity? Appl Econ Lett 15(1):5–10. doi:10.1080/13504850600690020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Briggs Depew
    • 1
    • 4
  • Peter Norlander
    • 2
  • Todd A. Sørensen
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Quinlan School of BusinessLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  4. 4.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations