Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 203–238

Welfare reform and the subjective well-being of single mothers

Original Paper

Abstract

Although a large body of research examines the impact of welfare reform, there remains considerable uncertainty as to whether single mothers’ well-being improved in the wake of these policy changes. Using unique data from the DDB Worldwide Communications Life StyleTM survey, this paper exploits a large battery of survey questions on self-reported life satisfaction and physical and mental health to study the impact of welfare reform on the subjective well-being of single mothers. The identification strategy relies on a difference-in-differences framework to estimate intent-to-treat effects for the welfare waiver and TANF periods. Results indicate that the bundle of TANF reforms had mostly positive effects on single mothers’ subjective well-being. These women experienced an increase in life satisfaction, greater optimism about the future, and more financial satisfaction. Furthermore, these improvements did not come at a cost of reducing mental and physical health. Welfare waivers, in contrast, had largely neutral effects on well-being. I provide indirect evidence that the increase in single mothers’ employment after welfare reform can plausibly explain the gains in subjective well-being.

Keywords

Happiness Single mothers Welfare reform 

JEL

I38 J08 I31 

Supplementary material

148_2012_406_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (463 kb)
(PDF 462 KB)

References

  1. Athey S, Imbens G (2006) Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74(2):431–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bavier R (1999) An early look at the effects of welfare reform. Mimeo MarchGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. Am Econ Rev 91(2):67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchflower D, Oswald A (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88(7–8):1359–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blank R (2002) Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. J Econ Lit 40(4):1105–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitler M, Hoynes H (2006) Welfare reform and indirect impacts on health. NBER working paper no 12642, National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bitler M, Hoynes H (2010) The state of the social safety net in the post-welfare reform era. Brookings Pap Econ Act Fall 71–127Google Scholar
  9. Bitler MP, Gelbach JB, Hoynes HW (2005) Welfare reform and health. J Hum Resour 40(2): 309–334Google Scholar
  10. Bitler M, Gelbach J, Hoynes H (2006) What mean impacts miss: the distributional effects of welfare reform. Am Econ Rev 96(4):988–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bollinger C, Gonzalex L, Ziliak J (2009) Welfare reform and the composition and level of income. In: Ziliak J (ed) Welfare reform and its long-term consequences for America’s poor. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Brewer M, Ratcliffe A, Smith S (2011) Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK. J Popul Econ 25:245–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark A, Oswald A (1994) Unhappiness and unemployment. Econ J 104:648–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crosby F (1982) Relative deprivation and working women. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Crouse G (1999) State implementation of major changes to welfare policies 1992–1998. http://aspe.hhs.gov/HSP/Waiver-Policies99/policy_CEA.htm. Retrieved 1 Sept 2006
  16. de Leeuw E (2005) To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. J Off Stat 21(2):233–255Google Scholar
  17. Di Tella R, MacCulloch R, Oswald A (2003) The macroeconomics of happiness. Rev Econ Stat 85(4):809–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener E (1984) Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 95(3):542–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener E (2006) Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. J Happiness Stud 7(4):397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener E, Oishi S (2004) Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective well-being. In: Columbus F (ed) Politics and economics of Asia, vol 10. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  21. Diener E, Seligman M (2004) Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychol Sci Public Interest 5(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener E, Lucas R, Scollon C (2006) Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaption theory of well-being. Am Psychol 61(4):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dillman D, Sangster R, Tarnai J, Rockwood T (1996) Understanding differences in people’s answers to telephone and mail surveys. New Dir Eval 70:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dillman D, Phelps G, Tortora R, Swift K, Kohrell J, Berck J, Messer B (2009) Response rate and measurement differences in mixed mode surveys: using mail telephone interactive voice response and the internet. Soc Sci Res 38:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Di Tella R, MacCullough R, Oswald A (2001) Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness. Am Econ Rev 91(1):335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edin K, Lein L (1997) Making ends meet: how single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Ehrhardt J, Saris W, Veehoven R (2000) Stability of life satisfaction over time. J Happiness Stud 1(2):177–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fang H, Keane M (2004) Assessing the impact of welfare reform on single mothers. Brookings Pap Econ Act 35(1):1–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer J (2009) Subjective well-being as welfare measure: concepts and methodology. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Working Paper No 16619Google Scholar
  30. Fletcher J (2011) The effects of teenage childbearing on the short- and long-term health behaviors of mothers. J Popul Econ 25(1):201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fordyce M (1988) A review of research on happiness measures: a sixty-second index of happiness and mental health. Soc Indic Res 20(4):355–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frey B, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40(2):402–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groeneman S (1994) Multi-purpose household panels and general samples: how similar and how different? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public opinion Research. Danvers MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Grogger J (2003) The effects of time limits the EITC and other policy changes on welfare use work and income among female-headed families. Rev Econ Stat 85(2):394–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grogger J, Karoly L (2005) Welfare reform: effects of a decade of change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossman M (1972) On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. J Polit Econ 80(2):223–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gruber J, Mullainathan S (2005) Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? Adv Econ Anal Pol 5:1412–1421Google Scholar
  38. Hallberg D, Klevmarken A (2003) Time for children: a study of parents’ time allocation. J Popul Econ 26(2):205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heberlein T, Baumgartner R (1978) Factors affecting response rate to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. Am Sociol Rev 43(4):447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heckman James J, Robert LaLonde, Jeffrey Smith (1999) The economics and econometrics of active labor market policies. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3A. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Helliwell J (2003) How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Econ Model 20:331–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Helliwell J (2006) Well-being and social capital: does suicide pose a puzzle? Soc Indic Res 81(3):455–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Herbst C (2008) Do social policy reforms have different impacts on employment and welfare use as economic conditions change? J Policy Anal Manage 27(4):867–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herbst C (2010) Footloose and fancy free? Two decades of single mothers’ subjective well-being. Working Paper, School of Public Affairs Arizona State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  45. Herbst C (2011) ‘Paradoxical’ decline? Another look at relative reduction in female happiness. J Econ Psychol 32(5):773–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ifcher J (2009) The happiness of single mothers after welfare reform. Working Paper, Department of Economics Santa Clara UniversityGoogle Scholar
  47. Ifcher J (2011) The happiness of single mothers after welfare reform. BE J Econ Anal Pol 11:1–27Google Scholar
  48. Ifcher J, Zarghamee H (2010) Trends in the happiness of single mothers: evidence from the General Social Survey. Working Paper, Department of Economics Santa Clara UniversityGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaestner R, Kaushal N (2005) Immigrant and native responses to welfare reform. J Popul Econ 18(1):69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman D, Krueger A (2006) Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 20(1):3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahneman D, Deaton A (2010) High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:16489–16493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kahneman D, Wakker P, Sarin R (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Q J Econ 112(2):375–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kaushal N, Kaestner R (2001) From welfare to work: Has welfare reform worked? J Policy Anal Manage 20:699–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krueger A, Schkade D (2008) The reliability of subjective well-being measures. J Public Econ 92(8–9):1833–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Layard R (2005) Happiness: lessons from a new science. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Meyer B, Rosenbaum D (2000) Making single mothers work: recent changes in tax and welfare policy and their effects. Natl Tax J 53(4):1027–1062Google Scholar
  57. Meyer B, Rosenbaum D (2001) Welfare the earned income tax credit and the labor supply of single mothers. Q J Econ 116(3):1063–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer B, Sullivan J (2004) The effects of welfare and tax reform: the material well-being of single mothers in the 1980s and 1990s. J Public Econ 88(7–8):1387–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Murphy G, Athanasou J (1999) The effect of unemployment on mental health. J Occup Organ Psychol 72:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Primus W, Rawlings L, Larin K, Porter K (1999) The initial impacts of welfare reform on the incomes of single-mother families. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  61. Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  62. Putnam R, Yonish S (1999) How important is response rate? An evaluation of a “mail panel” survey archive. Working Paper Cambridge, JFK School of Government Harvard University, MAGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruhm C (2003) Good times make you sick. J Health Econ 22(4):637–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schoeni R, Blank R (2000) What has welfare reform accomplished? Impacts on welfare participation, employment, income, poverty, and family structure. Working Paper No 7627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  65. Sousa-Poza A, Sousa-Poza AA (2003) Gender differences in job satisfaction in Great Britain 1991–2000: permanent or transitory? Appl Econ Lett 10(11):691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2009) The paradox of declining female happiness. Am Econ J: Econ Pol 1(2):190–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Viinamaeki H, Koskela K, Niskanen L (1996) Rapidly declining mental well-being during unemployment. Eur J Psychiatry 10(4):215–221Google Scholar
  69. Visser P, Krosnick J, Marquette J, Curtin M (1996) Mail surveying for election forecasting: an evaluation of the Columbus Dispatch poll. Public Opin Q 60(2):181–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AffairsArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations