Skip to main content
Log in

Son preference in Japan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the sex preference in Japan, using Japanese microdata, and find that parents in the 1920–1939 cohort have a lexicographic son preference. Further, the lexicographic son preference disappears in subsequent cohorts and a mixed preference is observed in parents with two children. These results are supported when the parents’ socioeconomic background is considered. Cohort effects such as weakening son preference and emerging mixed preference are observed. Moreover, when husbands are the eldest sons, a lexicographic son preference is observed only in the 1920–1939 cohort, although it persists in the subsequent cohorts when husbands are farmers/self-employed workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This survey contains information on how many children the respondents have even if they have more than five children.

  2. If we change this from 5 years to 10 years, the result of the following analysis in this section is similar.

  3. We cannot have the ratio of no sons because there are no respondents born in 1965–1969 who have no sons.

  4. The variables on the family background are suppressed. The authors can provide the complete tables upon request.

  5. We calculate the semielasticity of the hazard with respect to explanatory variables x using \([\textit{e}^x -1] \times 100 \) if the coefficient is larger than 0.3.

  6. Readers may think that there is multicollinearity between village, father_wife’s_name, father_agr_self, and father_eldest_son. However, the correlation coefficient between father_agr_self and village is the highest but is only 0.22.

References

  • Ahn N (1995) Measuring the value of children by sex and age using a dynamic programming model. Rev Econ Stud 62(3):361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist JD, Evans WN (1998) Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Am Econ Rev 88(3):450–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold F, Liu Z (1986) Sex preference, fertility, and family planning in China. Popul Dev Rev 12(2):221–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo CR, Zhang J (1997) Dynamic microeconomic models of fertility choice: a survey. J Popul Econ 10(1):23–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath Y, Welch F (1976) Do sex preferences really matter? Q J Econ 90(2):285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark S (2000) Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India. Demography 37(1):95-108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 34:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham MJ, Larsen U, Xu X (1998) Son preference in Anhui Province, China. Int Fam Plann Perspect 24(2):72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grambsch PM, Therneau TM (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81(3):515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray E, Duckworth D, Nakajima Y (1980) The human sex ratio and factors influencing family size in Japan. J Heredity 71(6):411–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Roy K (1995) Sex ratio at birth in China, with reference to other areas in East Asia: what we know? Asia-Pac Popul J 10(3):17–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hank K, Kohler HP (2000) Gender preferences for children in Europe: empirical results from 17 FFS countries. Demographic Research 2(1)

  • Haughton D (1997) Packages for estimating finite mixtures: a review. Am Stat 51(2):194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton D, Haughton J (1996) Using a mixture model to detect son preference in Vietnam. J Biosoc Sci 28(3):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haughton J, Haughton D (1998) Are simple tests of son preference useful? An evaluation using data from Vietnam. J Popul Econ 11(4):495–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horioka CY, Fujisaki H, Watanabe W, Kouno T (2000) Are Americans more altruistic than the Japanese? A U.S.–Japan comparison of saving and bequest motives. Int Econ J 14(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull TH (1990) Recent trends in sex ratios at birth in China. Popul Dev Rev 16(1):63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2008) Vital statistics. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo

  • Konrad KA, Kunemund H, Lommerud KE, Robledo JR (2002) Geography of the family. Am Econ Rev 92(4):981–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen U, Chung W, Gupta MD (1998) Fertility and son preference in Korea. Popul Stud 52(3):317-325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman MI (1985) A note on the human sex ratio and factors influencing family size in Japan. J Heredity 76(2):141

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Cho N (1995) Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Popul Dev Rev 21(1):59–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H (1989) Kodomo no Seibetsu ga Shusshou ni Ataeru Eikyo ni Tsuite (Child-sex effects on further births). Jinkou Mondai Kenkyuu (Journal of Population Problems) 189:18–30 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H (1989) Gendai Nihonjin no Seibetsu Senkou ni tsuite: 2 shi no seibetsu patan to 2 shi shusshou no kankei kara (Sex preference for children among couples in Japan: relationship between the sex sequence of parity two and third birth). Shakai Shinrigaku Kenkyu (Research in Social Psychology) 4(2):117–125 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H (1992) Kinnen ni okeru Kodomo no Seibetsu Senkou no Doukou to sono Shakai–Keizaiteki Sai (Recent trend in sex preferences for children among Japanese couples and their socio-economic differences). Shakai Shinrigaku Kenkyu (Research in Social Psychology) 7(2):75–84 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay WJ, Chu CYC (2005) The pattern of birth spacing during Taiwan’s demographic transition. J Popul Econ 18(2):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar S, Li N, Feldman MW (1995) High sex ratios in China’s future. Science 267:874–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Zheng Z (2005) Sex ratio of reported births between 1910 and 1969 in China. Presented at the CEPED-CICRED-INED Seminar on Female Deficit in Asia: Trends and Perspectives, Singapore, December 5–7, 2005. 16 p

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to anonymous referees and Charles Yuji Horioka for their kind advice, comments, and discussion throughout the process of writing this paper. We would also like to thank Tetsushi Homma, Daiji Kawaguchi, Colin McKenzie, Hideki Mizukami, James Raymo, Kei Sakata, Shizuka Sekita, Sawako Shirahase, Keiko Tamada, and the seminar participants at the University of Toyama, the Japanese Economic Association meeting of September 2007, and Prof. Horioka’s graduate seminar for their helpful comments and discussions. In addition, we thank the National Family Research of Japan and the Information Center for Social Science Research on Japan, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo (SSJ Data Archive), for permitting us to use data from the study “Trails of Families in Post-War Japan” (in Japanese, Sengo Nihon no Kazoku no Ayumi) (SSJDA0400). We are also indebted to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese government for the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (numbers 18330068 and 19330062) for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wataru Kureishi.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Junsen Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kureishi, W., Wakabayashi, M. Son preference in Japan. J Popul Econ 24, 873–893 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0282-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0282-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation