Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 1–36 | Cite as

The fertility effect of catastrophe: U.S. hurricane births

Original Paper

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence has suggested increased fertility rates resulting from catastrophic events in an area. In this paper, we measure this fertility effect using storm advisory data and fertility data for the Atlantic and Gulf-coast counties of the USA. We find that low-severity storm advisories are associated with a positive and significant fertility effect and that high-severity advisories have a significant negative fertility effect. As the type of advisory goes from least severe to most severe, the fertility effect of the specific advisory type decreases monotonically from positive to negative. We also find some other interesting demographic effects.

Keywords

Fertility Family planning Models with panel data Disaster 

JEL Classification

J13 C23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angrist JD, Evans WN (1999) Schooling and labor market consequences of the 1970 state abortion reforms. In: Polachek SW, Robst J (eds) Research in labor economics, vol 18. JAI, Stamford, pp 75–113Google Scholar
  2. Apgar V (1953) A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anest Anal 32(4):260–67Google Scholar
  3. Becker GS (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In: Coale AJ (ed) Demographic and economic change in developed countries: a conference of the Universities—National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp 209–40Google Scholar
  4. Becker GS, Barro RJ (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Q J Econ 53(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belasen AR, Polachek SW (2008) How disasters affect local labor markets: the effect of hurricanes in Florida. J Hum Resour (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Cain M (1981) Risk and insurance: perspectives on fertility and agrarian change in India and Bangladesh. Popul Dev Rev 7(3):435–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain M (1983) Fertility as an adjustment to risk. Popul Dev Rev 9(4):688–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deschenes O, Moretti E (2008) Extreme weather events, mortality and migration. Rev Econ Stat (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Heckman JJ, Willis RJ (1975) Estimation of a stochastic model of reproduction: an econometric approach. In: Terleckyj NE (ed) Household production and consumption, vol 40. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp 99–145Google Scholar
  10. Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1985) The economics of family planning. PRC Discussion Paper 85-5, The Population Research Center at NORC and the University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Hotz VJ, Klerman JA, Willis RJ (1997) The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics, vol 1A. Elsevier, New York, pp 275–347Google Scholar
  12. Huynen MMTE, Martens P, Schram D, Weijenberg MP, Kunst AE (2001) The impact of heat waves and cold spells on mortality rates in the dutch population. Environ Health Perspect 109(5):463–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindstrom DP, Berhanu B (1999) The impact of war, famine, and economic decline on marital fertility in ethiopia. Demography 36(2):247–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mincer J (1963) Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. In: Christ CF, Friedman M, Goodman LA, Griliches Z, Harberger AC, Liviatan N, Mincer J, Mundlak Y, Nerlove M, Patinkin D, Telser LG, Theil H (eds) Measurement in economics: studies in mathematical economics and econometrics in memory of Yehuda Grunfeld. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  15. Moffitt R (1984a) Optimal life-cycle profiles of fertility and labor supply. In: Schultz PT, Wolpin KI (eds) Research in population economics, vol 5. JAI, Greenwich, pp 29–50Google Scholar
  16. Moffitt R (1984b) Profiles of fertility, labour supply and wages of married women: a complete life-cycle model. Rev Econ Stud 51(2):263–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. NOAA (2007) Weather safety: hurricanes. Safety and preparedness fact sheet. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Orphanides A (2001) Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. Am Econ Rev 91(4):964–85Google Scholar
  19. Pedicini S (2005) 9 months after the storms. Orlando SentinelGoogle Scholar
  20. Pop-Eleches C (2006) The impact of an abortion ban on socioeconomic outcomes of children: evidence from romania. J Polit Econ 114(4):744–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pörtner CC (2001) Children as insurance. J Popul Econ 14(1):119–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pörtner CC (2008) Gone with the wind? hurricane risk, fertility and education. Working Paper UWEC-2006-19-R, University of Washington Economics Department Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson WC (1986) High fertility as risk-insurance. Popul Stud 40(2):289–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodgers JL, St John CA, Coleman R (2005) Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma city bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography 42(4):675–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenzweig MR, Schultz TP (1985) Demand for and supply of births: fertility and its life cycle consequences. Am Econ Rev 75(5):992–1015Google Scholar
  26. Schultz TP (1997) Demand for children in low income countries. In: Rosenzweig MR, Stark O (eds) Handbook of population and family economics, vol 1A. Elsevier, New York, pp 543–630Google Scholar
  27. Tolchin M (August 10, 1966) Births up nine months after blackout. New York Times, p 1Google Scholar
  28. Udry JR (1970) The effect of the great blackout of 1965 on births in New York City. Demography 7(3):325–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolpin KI (1984) An estimable dynamic stochastic model of fertility and child mortality. J Polit Econ 92(5):852–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang D (2006) Coping with disaster: the impact of hurricanes on international financial flows, 1970-2002. NBER Working Paper 12794, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)BonnGermany
  4. 4.School of Labor and Human ResourcesRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations