Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Robot as the “mechanical other”: transcending karmic dilemma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the artificial intelligence of computers grows ever-more sophisticated and continues to surpass the capacities of human minds in many ways, people are forced to question alleged ontological categories that separate humans from machines. As we are entering the world which is populated by non-enhanced and enhanced humans, cyborgs, robots, androids, avatars, and clones among them, the desire for evolutionary mastery of the natural world has taken on the two main directions: merging with machines in (1) disembodied forms or (2) embodied forms. As a path to breaking past the discontinuity between humans and machines and enter into a world beyond the “fourth” discontinuity, machines are viewed as an evolutionary step toward the “perfection” or “immortality” of humans. However, this popular, instrumental views of machines, stemming from the existential death anxiety and the hope for transcending mortality, reveals the karmic dilemma of desiring or grasping something. We shall discuss the possibility that machines can present, ultimately, a revolutionary step rather than an evolutionary step toward understanding “who we are.” The path toward a continuity with machines lies not in our desire for merging with the robots, but in recognizing the arbitrary nature of all such identity categories. This radical understanding of the self-identity can be seen as a facet of enlightened experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W (2003) The next enlightenment: integrating east and west in a new vision of human. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and Simulation. Tr. Sheila Faria Glaser. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Best S (2009) Minding the animals: ethology and the obsolescence of left humanism. Int J Incl Democr 5(2):1–26

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr (1935) Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev 48:696–702

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2004) The future of human evolution. In: Tandy C (ed) Death and anti-death: 200 years after Kant, 50 years after turing. Ria University Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA (2002) Flesh and machines: how robots will change us. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler S (1923) Darwin among the machines. In: In a first year in Canterbury settlement and other early essays, vols 20. Shrewsbury Edition of the Works of Samuel Butler, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dator J (1989) “What do ‘You’ do when your robot bows as your clone enters holographic MTV?” for the conference, “humans-cultures-futures,” Tenri City, Japan, August 30–31, 1988, published in Futures

  • Dator J, Seo Y (2004) Korea as the wave of a future: the emerging dream society of icons and aesthetic experience. J Futures Stud 9:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola P (1994) In the society of nature: a native ecology in Amazonia (Nora Scott, Trans.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick PK (1968) Do androids dream of electric sheep? Del Rey, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H (1972) What computers can’t do. MIT Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2006) “Utopian body”. Sensorium: embodied experience, technology and contemporary art. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (1917) A difficulty in the path of psychoanalysis. SE 17:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2002) Our Posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvan J (1997) Entering the posthuman collective in Philip K. Dick’s “do androids dream of electric sheep?” Sci Fict Stud 24(3):413–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles J (1993) The no-self theory: Hume, Buddhism, and personal identity. Philos East West 43:175–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel DJ (2012a) “Communication and artificial intelligence: opportunities and challenges for the 21st Century,” communication + 1: vol 1, article 1. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cpo/vol1/iss1/1. Accessed 3 Apr 2017

  • Gunkel DJ (2012b) The machine question. In: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Hayles K (1999) How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1954) The question concerning technology and other essays. 1954. Trans. William Lovitt. Harper Colophon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo HH, Kim MS (2013) The effects of multiculturalism and mechanistic disdain for robots in human-to-robot communication scenarios. Interact Stud 14:81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter D (1980) Gödel, escher, bach: an eternal golden braid. Vintage Books, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1896) In: LA Selby-Bigge (ed) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford (Reprinted from the Original Edition in three volumes and edited, with an analytical index)

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys C (1985) Zen: a way of life. Hodder & Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow R (1983) The enchanted loom: mind in the universe. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY

  • Kasulis TP (1981) Zen action zen person. University of Hawai’i, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim MS, Kim EJ (2013) Humanoid robots as “The Cultural Other”: are we able to love our creations? AI Soc 28:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MS, Sur J, Gong L (2009) Humans and humanoid social robots in communication. AI Soc 24:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim MS, Gong L, Saito N, Nishigaya K, Cabico M, LaFontaine P (2011) The role of self-construal on preferred communication styles with humanoid robots. Int J Humanoid Rob 8:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopf G (2001) Beyond personal identity: Dogen, Nishida, and a phenomenology of no-self. Routledge Studies in Asian Religion, New York, NY

  • Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza R, Berman R. (2010) Biocentrism: how life and consciousness are the keys to understanding the universe. Benbella Books, Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo T (2017) Future consciousness: the path to purposeful evolution. Changemakers Books, Alresford, UK

  • Lusthaus D (1989) A philosophic investigation of the Chéng Wei-Shih Lun: Vasubandhu, Hsuan Tsang and the transmission of Vijnapti-Matra (Yogacara) from India to China. Ph.D. Diss., Temple University. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI

  • Malik K (2001) What is it to be human?: what science can and cannot tell us. Academy of Ideas, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazlish B (1993) The fourth discontinuity. Yale University Press, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec H (1999) Robot: mere machine to transcendent mind. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier B (2008) When robots would really be human simulacra: love and the ethical in Spielberg’s AI and Proyas’s I. Robot Film Philos 12:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperell R (2003) The posthuman condition: consciousness beyond the brain. Intellect Books, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperell R (2005) Posthumans and extended experience. J Evolut Technol 14:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole DL, MacWorth AK (2010) Artificial intelligence: foundations of computational agents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Pribram K (2013) The form within. Prospecta Press, Westport, CT

  • Roszak T (1986) The cult of information. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (2009) The dangers of individualism and the human relationship to technology in Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. Sci Fict Stud 36:67–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville M (2006) The ethical imagination: journeys of the human spirit. House of Anansi, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofts D (2003) Avatars of the tortoise: life, longevity, and simulation. Digit Creat 14:54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Virillo P (1994) The vision machine, trans. Julie Rose. British Film Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communicology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Min-Sun Kim

Authors
  1. Min-Sun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Sun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, MS. Robot as the “mechanical other”: transcending karmic dilemma. AI & Soc 34, 321–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0841-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0841-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation