AI & SOCIETY

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Digitalisation and the regulation of work: theoretical issues and normative challenges

Open Forum
  • 162 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an introductory overview of the main issues that the digitalisation of industrial enterprises known as Industry 4.0 raises for social sciences. First, it will show that this technological transition—which, however, is unfinished and is seen to be in continuity with the so-called “third industrial revolution”—cannot be interpreted with reference to a deterministic approach. It can be analysed more usefully as a range of decisions affecting the industrial policies of national states, the conception and design of machines, their adoption in production processes and finally their use by operators. Second, certain aspects of Industry 4.0 of special concern in terms of organisation of work processes will be analysed on various scales (from inter-company transactions to the specific tasks of individual workers). Finally, we will explain various hypotheses that social and economic research is developing with regard to the new technologies’ controversial effects on employment.

Keywords

Digitalisation Industry 4.0 Work Organisation Manufacturing 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Autor D (2010) Skills, tasks, and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economico, vol 4B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1043–1171Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2016) The race between machine and man: implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment, NBER working paper no. 22252. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22252
  3. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor market, NBER working paper no. 23285. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23285
  4. Arntz MT, Gregory and Zierahn U (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD social, employment and migration working papers, no. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
  5. Beck U (2013) German Europe. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Benasayag M (2016) Cerveau augmenté, homme diminué. La Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Berta G (2014) Produzione intelligente. Un viaggio nelle nuove fabbriche, Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  8. Boltanski L, Esquerre A (2016) L’économie de l’enrichissement et ses effets sociaux, Teoria Politica, nuova serie, annali VI, pp 289–306Google Scholar
  9. Boston Consulting Group (2015a) Industry 4.0. The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. http://www.zvw.de/media.media.72e472fb-1698-4a15-8858-344351c8902f.original.pdf
  10. Bower JL, Christensen CM (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Bus Rev 73(1):43–53Google Scholar
  11. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age: progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cirillo V, Pianta M, Nascia L (2015) The dynamics of skills: technology and business cycles, scuola superiore sant’Anna Lem working paper, no. 2015/30Google Scholar
  13. Dardot P, Laval Ch (2009) La nouvelle raison du monde. Essai sur la société néolibérale, La Découvert, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. de Terssac G (1992) Autonomie dans le travail. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelen E, Johal S, Salento A, Williams K (2014) How to build a fairer city, The Guardian/Cities. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/sep/24/manifesto-fairer-grounded-city-sustainable-transport-broadband-housing. Accessed 24 Sept 2014
  16. European Commission (2012) A stronger European industry for growth and economic recovery, communication to the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2012)0582_/com_com(2012)0582_en.pdf
  17. Fligstein N (2001) The architecture of markets: an economic sociologo of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Book Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank RH, Cook P (1995) The winner-take-all society. Why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford University programme on the impacts of future technology, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallino L (1998) Se tre milioni vi sembran pochi. Sui modi per combattere la disoccupazione, Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  22. Glaeser EL (2011) Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 78(6):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison B (1994) Lean and mean: the changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Head S (2014) Mindless: why smarter machines are making dumber humans. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Krippner G (2011) Capitalizing on crisis: the political origins of the rise of finance. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Maggi B (2003) De l’agir organisationnel: un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l’apprentissage. Toulouse, OctarèsGoogle Scholar
  28. Magone A, Mazali T (2016) Industria 4.0. Uomini e macchine nella fabbrica digitale, Guerini e Associati, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  29. Masino G, Zamarian M (2000) La mediazione degli artefatti nella regolazione organizzativa. In: Maggi B (ed) Le sfide organizzative di fine e inizio secolo. Tra post-fordismo e deregolazione, Etas, Torino, pp 151–164Google Scholar
  30. Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrialized civilization. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Moretti E (2012) The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Noble D (1979) Social choice in machine design. In: Zimbalist A (ed) Case studies on the labor process. Monthly Review Press, New York, pp 100–134Google Scholar
  33. Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  34. Page SE (2006) Path dependence. Q J Political Sci 1:87–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Piketty Th (2013) Le capital au XXI siècle. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Doubleday Anchor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramella F (2015) Sociology of economic innovation. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Sachs JD and Kotlikoff LJ (2012) Smart machines and long-term misery”, NBER working paper no. w18629. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2192802)
  39. Salento A, Masino G (2013) La fabbrica della crisi. Finanziarizzazione delle imprese e declino del lavoro, Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  40. Staglianò R (2016) Al posto tuo. Così web e robot ci stanno rubando il lavoro, Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  41. Standing G (2011) The precariat: the new dangerous class. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. World Economic Forum (2016) The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistorySociety and Human Studies University of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations