Correction to: Intensive Care Med https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06093-4

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Fig. 1 and 2 was incorrect. The corrected Figs. 1 and 2 are given below. The authors apologize for the mistake.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Probability of infection diagnosis (solid line), or sepsis diagnosis among patients with infection (dotted line), with 95% confidence bands given a patient’s presenting temperature. Note sepsis diagnosis includes patients not discharged from the ED that had any sepsis-related organ dysfunction ICD10-CA diagnosis or procedure code in the ED record

Fig. 2
figure 2

Probability of infection diagnosis (solid line), or sepsis among patients with infection (dotted line), with 95% confidence bands for select patient measures on the original measurement scale. Note sepsis diagnosis includes patients not discharged from the ED that had any sepsis-related organ dysfunction ICD10-CA diagnosis or procedure code in the ED record