We thank Rajendram et al. , who—with an amusing use of a pun—point out a “hole” in our Editorial. This physical and metaphorical hole is clearly the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) as an additional mechanism in the hypoxaemia observed in COVID-19. Although PFO is frequently found in the general population , we have not documented any cases in which PFO significant enough to (even partly) explain the hypoxaemia. All our patients undergo echocardiography to exclude structural or functional heart abnormalities that may explain or contribute to respiratory failure (e.g. severe mitral regurgitation or, indeed intracardiac shunt). It is clear that if such an abnormality was to be found—the whole idea of phenotypes is no longer relevant is the hypoxaemia may be explained by intracardiac shunt regardless of presence or absence of COVID-19 . This argument is also valid for any ventilated patient. Therefore, we do not share the enthusiasm of Rajendram et al. , to further sub-classify phenotypes. We intended to present a conceptual framework that can aid the selection of the ventilatory strategy, while avoiding the use of multiple and confusing acronyms. We however fully agree with Rajendram et al. that echocardiography is an essential tool for the diagnosis and management of all ventilated patients whether with classical or ‘atypical’ ARDS.
We read with interest the letter by Jain et al. , who summarise some of the understanding of the ACE-2-mediated dysregulation of pulmonary perfusion in COVD-19, and delineate an ‘epithelial-endothelial cross-talk’ as a possible mechanism for hypoxaemia. The mechanism they propose is certainly plausible and consistent with the biology of ACE-2 receptors [4, 5] and with some phases of the history of the disease.
However, despite the undeniable temptation to provide a unified mechanism to explain the dysregulated ventilation/perfusion relationship in COVID-19, the interaction between the heterogenous distribution of the disease, the variable amount of pulmonary oedema, the ventilation strategy received and the duration of symptoms, make the search for a single explanatory mechanism simplistic. In addition, inflammation and thrombosis  can lead to occlusion of the vasculature that will increase dead space and contribute to the increase in minute ventilation and work of breathing. We disagree, however with Jain et al. when they state that P-SILI is an unlikely mechanism of the worsening of the respiratory function in COVID-19. Indeed, in many institutions the use (sometimes prolonged) of non-invasive support (NIV or CPAP) is a frequent strategy for managing COVID-19 pneumonitis [7, 8]. It is clear that NIV or CPAP will not lead to P-SILI in all instances. If the support is able to reduce the respiratory effort (trans-pulmonary pressure), and the of the disease follows a more benign course the hypoxaemia will resolve. However, uncontrolled work of breathing can lead to additional oedema and lung injury and can explain some of the results found in the literature that describes the outcomes of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure who undergo initial treatment with non-invasive strategies [9,10,11]. These results may be applicable to COVID-19.
We would like once again to stress the difference between having a conceptual pathophysiological framework versus having an explanatory biological model. Our intention was to suggest the former while recognising the difficulties in describing the latter [12, 13]. The model we describe, whilst based on physiological considerations, has a high degree of pragmatism to suit front-line management and triage decisions in the many patients who have fallen victim of COVID-19 pneumonitis.
Rajendram R, Kharal GA, Mahmood N (2020) Rethinking the respiratory paradigm of Covid-19: a ‘hole’ in the argument. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06102-6
Mojadidi MK, Ruiz JC, Chertoff J, Zaman MO, Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Al-Ani M, Elgendy AY, Patel NK, Shantha G, Tobis JM, Meier B (2019) Patent foramen ovale and hypoxemia. Cardiol Rev 27:34–40
Jain A, Doyle J (2020) Stages or phenotypes? A critical look at COVID-19 pathophysiology. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06083-6
Santos RAS, Sampaio WO, Alzamora AC, Motta-Santos D, Alenina N, Bader M, Campagnole-Santos MJ (2018) The ACE2/angiotensin-(1-7)/MAS axis of the renin-angiotensin system: focus on angiotensin-(1-7). Physiol Rev 98:505–553
Wevers BA, van der Hoek L (2010) Renin-angiotensin system in human coronavirus pathogenesis. Future Virol 5:145–161
Klok FA, Kruip M, van der Meer NJM, Arbous MS, Gommers D, Kant KM, Kaptein FHJ, van Paassen J, Stals MAM, Huisman MV, Endeman H (2020) Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res 191:145–147
Tobin MJ (2020) Basing respiratory management of coronavirus on physiological principles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 11:1319–1320
Phua J, Weng L, Ling L, Egi M, Lim CM, Divatia JV, Shrestha BR, Arabi YM, Ng J, Gomersall CD, Nishimura M, Koh Y, Du B, Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (2020) Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med 8:506–517
Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Madotto F, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, Bumbasirevic V, Piquilloud L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Bauer PR, Arabi YM, Ranieri M, Antonelli M, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A, LUNG SAFE Investigators, ESICM Trials Group (2017) Noninvasive ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:67–77
Carrillo A, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Ferrer M, Martinez-Quintana ME, Lopez-Martinez A, Llamas N, Alcazar M, Torres A (2012) Non-invasive ventilation in community-acquired pneumonia and severe acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 38:458–466
Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R, FLORALI Study Group, REVA Network (2015) High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 372:2185–2196
Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, Camporota L (2020) COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2
Marini JJ, Gattinoni L (2020) Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6825
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Camporota, L., Chiumello, D., Busana, M. et al. From phenotypes to black holes… and back. Intensive Care Med 46, 1498–1499 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06124-0