Skip to main content
Log in

What’s new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning

  • What's New in Intensive Care
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ffoulkes P (2017) InsideBIGDATA guide to the intelligent use of big data on an industrial scale. InsideBIGDATA, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  2. Booth CM, Tannock IF (2014) Randomised controlled trials and population-based observational research: partners in the evolution of medical evidence. Br J Cancer 110:551–555

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Apkon M, Singhaviranon P (2001) Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:122–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V (2014) Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst 2:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Murdoch TB, Detsky AS (2013) The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 309:1351–1352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flechet M, Grandas FG, Meyfroidt G (2016) Informatics in neurocritical care: new ideas for Big Data. Curr Opin Crit Care 22:87–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM (2016) Tolerating uncertainty—the next medical revolution? N Engl J Med 375:1713–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Angus DC (2015) Fusing randomized trials with big data: the key to self-learning health care systems? JAMA 314:767–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mirnezami R, Nicholson J, Darzi A (2012) Preparing for precision medicine. N Engl J Med 366:489–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perner A, Gordon AC, Angus DC, Lamontagne F, Machado F, Russell JA, Timsit JF, Marshall JC, Myburgh J, Shankar-Hari M, Singer M (2017) The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock. Intensive Care Med 43:1294–1305

  11. Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11:550–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailly S, Bouadma L, Azoulay E, Orgeas MG, Adrie C, Souweine B, Schwebel C, Maubon D, Hamidfar-Roy R, Darmon M, Wolff M, Cornet M, Timsit JF (2015) Failure of empirical systemic antifungal therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1139–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Timsit JF, Azoulay E, Schwebel C, Charles PE, Cornet M, Souweine B, Klouche K, Jaber S, Trouillet JL, Bruneel F, Argaud L, Cousson J, Meziani F, Gruson D, Paris A, Darmon M, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Navellou JC, Foucrier A, Allaouchiche B, Das V, Gangneux JP, Ruckly S, Maubon D, Jullien V, Wolff M, EMPIRICUS Trial Group (2016) Empirical micafungin treatment and survival without invasive fungal infection in adults with ICU-acquired sepsis, candida colonization, and multiple organ failure: the EMPIRICUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:1555–1564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guiza F, Van Eyck J, Meyfroidt G (2013) Predictive data mining on monitoring data from the intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput 27:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flechet M, Guiza F, Schetz M, Wouters P, Vanhorebeek I, Derese I, Gunst J, Spriet I, Casaer M, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G (2017) AKIpredictor, an online prognostic calculator for acute kidney injury in adult critically ill patients: development, validation and comparison to serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. Intensive Care Med 43:764–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatt DL, Mehta C (2016) Adaptive designs for clinical trials. N Engl J Med 375:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pocock SJ, Stone GW (2016) The primary outcome fails—what next? N Engl J Med 375:861–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Timsit.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bailly, S., Meyfroidt, G. & Timsit, JF. What’s new in ICU in 2050: big data and machine learning. Intensive Care Med 44, 1524–1527 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5034-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-5034-3

Keywords

Navigation