Primäre Frakturprothese und inverse Schulterprothese bei komplexer Humeruskopffraktur

Eine Alternative zur gelenkerhaltenden Osteosynthese?
  • B. Erdle
  • K. Izadpanah
  • H. Eberbach
  • J. Zwingmann
  • M. Jaeger
  • N. Südkamp
  • D. Maier
Leitthema

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

In den letzten Jahren hat sich bei der operativen Versorgung komplexer Humeruskopffrakturen ein dynamischer Wandel vollzogen. So hat der primäre Einsatz von inversen Schulterfrakturprothesen bei älteren Patienten erheblich an Bedeutung gewonnen. Die kurz- bis mittelfristigen Ergebnisse der inversen Frakturprothetik präsentieren sich vielversprechend, Langzeitergebnisse stehen jedoch noch aus. Hingegen hat die anatomische Frakturprothetik zugunsten der Osteosynthese und inversen Frakturprothese stark an Stellenwert verloren.

Indikationen

Dieser Übersichtsartikel beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob und wann eine primäre Frakturprothese zur Behandlung der komplexen Humeruskopffraktur eine Alternative zur gelenkerhaltenden Osteosynthese darstellt bzw. dieser sogar vorzuziehen ist. Des Weiteren soll auf das jeweilige Indikationsspektrum der anatomischen und inversen Frakturprothetik eingegangen werden.

Schlüsselwörter

Ältere Frakturfixierung, interne Hemiprothese Proximale Humerusfraktur Schulterprothese 

Abkürzungen

AO

Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen

ASES

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score

CRPS

Chronisches regionales Schmerzsyndrom

DASH

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand Score

HA

Anatomische Frakturhemiprothese

LOE

„Level of evidence“

MRA

Multivariater Regressionsanalyse

OSS

Oxford Shoulder Score

OTA

Orthopedic Trauma Association

PE

Polyethylen

RSA

Inverse Frakturprothese

UCLA

University of California Los Angeles Score

Primary fracture protheses and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex humeral head fractures

An alternative to joint-preserving osteosynthesis?

Abstract

Background

The surgical management of complex humeral head fractures has adapted dynamically over the course of the last decade. The primary use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients has gained in relevance due to promising short and middle-term results. Long-term results, however, are still pending. The appliance of anatomical hemiarthroplasty, on the other hand, has lost in significance in favour of osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Indications

This review article follows the question as to under which circumstances primary fracture arthroplasty reflects an alternative or even a preference to joint-preserving osteosynthesis in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. It also specifies spectrums of indications for anatomical hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Keywords

Elderly Fracture fixation, internal Hemiarthroplasty Humeral fractures, proximal Prosthetic Shoulder 

Notes

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

B. Erdle, K. Izadpanah, H. Eberbach, J. Zwingmann, M. Jaeger, N. Südkamp und D. Maier geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Acevedo DC, Vanbeek C, Lazarus MD et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: update on indications, technique, and results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:279–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anakwenze OA, Zoller S, Ahmad CS et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:e73–e80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bastian JD, Hertel R (2008) Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:2–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:216–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgartner D, Nolan BM, Mathys R et al (2011) Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 6:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L et al (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:401–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brorson S, Salomonsson B, Jensen SL et al (2017) Revision after shoulder replacement for acute fracture of the proximal humerus. Acta Orthop 88:446–450CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campochiaro G, Rebuzzi M, Baudi P et al (2015) Complex proximal humerus fractures: Hertel’s criteria reliability to predict head necrosis. Musculoskelet Surg 99(Suppl 1):S9–S15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cvetanovich GL, Frank RM, Chalmers PN et al (2016) Surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: the emerging role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 39:e465–e473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA (2015) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 29:60–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Hovden IA et al (2012) Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 26:98–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frombach AA, Brett K, Lapner P (2017) Humeral head replacement and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fracturesm. Open Orthop J 11:1108–1114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gadea F, Favard L, Boileau P et al (2016) Fixation of 4‑part fractures of the proximal humerus: can we identify radiological criteria that support locking plates or IM nailing? Comparative, retrospective study of 107 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:963–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU et al (2007) The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:185–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta AK, Harris JD, Erickson BJ et al (2015) Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures – a systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients. J Orthop Trauma 29:54–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Han RJ, Sing DC, Feeley BT et al (2016) Proximal humerus fragility fractures: recent trends in nonoperative and operative treatment in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25:256–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Handoll HH, Keding A, Corbacho B et al (2017) Five-year follow-up results of the PROFHER trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint J 99-B:383–392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hardeman F, Bollars P, Donnelly M et al (2012) Predictive factors for functional outcome and failure in angular stable osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. Injury 43:153–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M et al (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:427–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jo MJ, Gardner MJ (2012) Proximal humerus fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5:192–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jobin CM, Galdi B, Anakwenze OA et al (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:190–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kohan EM, Chalmers PN, Salazar D et al (2017) Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:1238–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Konrad G, Audige L, Lambert S et al (2012) Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:602–609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:217–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S et al (2011) Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 42:1283–1288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maier D, Jager M, Strohm PC et al (2012) Treatment of proximal humeral fractures – a review of current concepts enlightened by basic principles. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79:307–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maier D, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K et al (2014) Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:251–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mata-Fink A, Meinke M, Jones C et al (2013) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures in older adults: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22:1737–1748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Namdari S, Horneff JG, Baldwin K (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1701–1708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1090–1103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S et al (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3‑part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:747–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Osterhoff G, O’hara NN, D’cruz J et al (2017) A cost-effectiveness analysis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for the management of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. Value Health 20:404–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park YK, Kim SH, Oh JH (2017) Intermediate-term outcome of hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:85–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM et al (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1215–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A et al (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1419–1426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh A, Padilla M, Nyberg EM et al (2017) Cement technique correlates with tuberosity healing in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:437–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP et al (2009) Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1689–1697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P et al (2009) Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1320–1328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun Q, Ge W, Li G et al (2017) Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R et al (2001) Nerve lesions in proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:421–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang G, Mao Z, Zhang L et al (2015) Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 10:122CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Erdle
    • 1
  • K. Izadpanah
    • 1
  • H. Eberbach
    • 1
  • J. Zwingmann
    • 1
  • M. Jaeger
    • 1
  • N. Südkamp
    • 1
  • D. Maier
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische FakultätAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations