Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and functional characteristics of a subsample of young people presenting for primary mental healthcare at headspace services across Australia

  • Study Protocols and Samples
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Headspace services provide treatment options to young people seeking mental healthcare. To obtain a better understanding of needs and characteristics of this population, and effectively evaluate services, we require novel youth-specific outcome measures. As part of our broad research program to establish such measures, a sample of young people were recruited and assessed. The study describes (i) methodology used to obtain clinical, functioning, and substance use characteristics of young people presenting to headspace services; and (ii) an overview of these characteristics.

Methods

Young people presenting to headspace centres were recruited. Multidimensional information was obtained relating to clinical and functional outcomes, demographic information, and lifestyle factors.

Results

1107 young help-seeking individuals were recruited. Participants were most likely young adults aged M = 18.1 years, SD = 3.3, with diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety (76.6%, n = 801), engaged in work and study (84.9%, n = 890), and living with parent(s) (68.9%, n = 736). Impairments in functioning were moderate as indicated by the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (M = 65.2, SD = 9.5), substance use was common (alcohol 62.7%, n = 665; illicit substances 30.5%, n = 324), and current suicidal ideation was reported by a third (33.6%, n = 358).

Conclusions

A broad dataset was obtained providing an insight into key clinical, functional and quality of life characteristics of these individuals. We observed that young people present with complex problems, comorbid diagnoses, moderate levels of symptomatology, impairments in functioning, substance use, and suicidal ideation. This work provides the foundation for our broader research program aiming to develop novel, relevant and youth-specific, change and outcome measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gore FM, Bloem PJ, Patton GC, Ferguson J, Joseph V, Coffey C, Sawyer SM, Mathers CD (2011) Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 377(9783):2093–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibb SJ, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ (2010) Burden of psychiatric disorder in young adulthood and life outcomes at age 30. Br J Psychiatry 197(2):122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson SE, Lawrence D, Hafekost J, Saw S, Buckingham WJ, Sawyer MG, Ainley J, Zubrick SR (2016) Service use by Australian children for emotional and behavioural problems : Findings from the second Australian Child and Adolescent Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Zealand J Psychiatry 50 (9)

  4. Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, Arora M, Azzopardi P, Baldwin W, Bonell C (2016) Our future: a lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. The Lancet 387(10036):2423–2478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, Obradors-Tarragó C, Arango C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Bitter I, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Demotes-Mainard J (2015) Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry 2(11):1036–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rickwood D, Paraskakis M, Quin D, Hobbs N, Ryall V, Trethowan J, McGorry P (2019) Australia’s innovation in youth mental health care: the headspace centre model. Early Intervent Psychiatry 13(1):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGorry TJ, Rickwood D (2019) Creating headspace for integrated youth mental health care. World Psychiatry 18(2):140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Headspace (2019) Headspace annual report 2018–19. Headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rickwood DJ, Telford NR, Parker AG, Tanti CJ, McGorry PD (2014) headspace—Australia’s innovation in youth mental health: who are the clients and why are they presenting? Med J Aust 200(2):108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Australian Government (2019) 2019–2020 Ministerial Statement—Health. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/statements/2019_2020/ministerial-statement/health.aspx. Accessed 10/04/2020

  11. Hetrick SE, Bailey AP, Smith KE, Malla A, Mathias S, Singh SP, O’Reilly A, Verma SK, Benoit L, Fleming TM, Moro MR, Rickwood DJ, Duffy J, Eriksen T, Illback R, Fisher CA, McGorry PD (2017) Integrated (one-stop shop) youth health care: best available evidence and future directions. Med J Aust 207(10):S5–S18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobo R, Petrich M, Burns SK (2014) Supporting health promotion practitioners to undertake evaluation for program development. BMC Public Health 14(1):1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilferty F, Cassells R, Muir K, Duncan A, Christensen D, Mitrou F, Katz I (2015) Is headspace making a difference to young people's lives? Final report of the independent evaluation of the headspace program. Social Policy Research Centre. Sydney, Australia

  14. Muir K, Powell A, Patulny R, Flaxman S, McDermott S, Oprea I, Gendera S, Vespignani J, Sitek T, Abello D, Katz I (2009) Headspace evaluation report. Independent evaluation of headspace: the national youth mental health foundation. Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales

  15. Kwan B, Rickwood D (2015) A systematic review of mental health outcome measures for young people aged 12 to 25 years. BMC Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0664-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker A, Hetrick S, Purcell R (2010) Psychosocial assessment of young people—refining and evaluating a youth friendly assessment interview. Aust Fam Physician 39(8):585–588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carpenter JS, Iorfino F, Cross S, Nichles A, Zmicerevska N, Crouse JJ, Palmer JR, Whitton AE, White D, Naismith SL, Guastella AJ, Hermens DF, Scott J, Scott EM, Hickie IB (2020) Cohort profile: the Brain and Mind Centre <em>Optymise</em> cohort: tracking multidimensional outcomes in young people presenting for mental healthcare. BMJ Open 10(3):e030985. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030985

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pirkis J, Burgess P, Coombs T, Clarke A, Jones-Ellis D, Dickson R (2005) Routine measurement of outcomes in Australia’s public sector mental health services. Aust N Zeal Health Policy 2(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whipple JL, Lambert MJ (2011) Outcome measures for practice. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 7:87–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Timimi S, Tetley D, Burgoine W, Walker G (2013) Outcome orientated child and adolescent mental health services (OO-CAMHS): a whole service model. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 18(2):169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel V, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P (2007) Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. The Lancet 369(9569):1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60368-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McGorry PD, Tanti C, Stokes R, Hickie IB, Carnell K, Littlefield LK, Moran J (2007) headspace: Australia’s National Youth Mental Health Foundation—where young minds come first. Med J Aust 187(S7):S68–S70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hetrick SE, Parker AG, Callahan P, Purcell R (2010) Evidence mapping: illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health. J Eval Clin Pract 16(6):1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01112.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9):606–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 32(6):959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB (2006) Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety 23(4):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M (1999) Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38(10):1230–1236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roelofs J, Muris P, Huibers M, Peeters F, Arntz A (2006) On the measurement of rumination: a psychometric evaluation of the ruminative response scale and the rumination on sadness scale in undergraduates. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 37(4):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds WM (1987) Suicidal ideation questionnaire (SIQ). Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kanter JW, Mulick PS, Busch AM, Berlin KS, Martell CR (2006) The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS): psychometric properties and factor structure. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 29(3):191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9038-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Snell WE Jr, Gum S, Shuck RL, Mosley JA, Kite TL (1995) The clinical anger scale: preliminary reliability and validity. J Clin Psychol 51(2):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL, Rietveld MW, Rietdijk J, Dragt S, Klaassen RM, Nieman DH, Wunderink L, Linszen DH, van der Gaag M (2012) The validity of the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull 38(6):1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher CA, Goodall J, Simmons MB, Allott K, Hetrick SE (2016) Subjective ratings of neurocognitive functioning in depressed young people undergoing treatment: utility of a brief screening tool. Early Intervent Psychiatry 10(3):252–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, de Lacerda RB, Ling W, Marsden J, Monteiro M, Nhiwatiwa S, Pal H, Poznyak V, Simon S (2008) Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). Addiction 103(6):1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02114.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28(2):193–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Godin G (2011) The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire. Health Fit J Can 4(1):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perera HN (2016) Construct validity of the Social Provisions Scale: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Assessment 23(6):720–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115589344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta A, Chong S, Leong FT (2015) Development and validation of the vocational identity measure. J Career Assess 23(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Richardson JR, Peacock SJ, Hawthorne G, Iezzi A, Elsworth G, Day NA (2012) Construction of the descriptive system for the assessment of quality of life AQoL-6D utility instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 10(1):38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Assocation, Arlington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. McGorry PD, Hickie IB, Yung AR, Pantelis C, Jackson HJ (2006) Clinical staging of psychiatric disorders: a heuristic framework for choosing earlier, safer and more effective interventions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 40(8):616–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01860.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR (1992) Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry 149:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carney R, Yung AR, Amminger GP, Bradshaw T, Glozier N, Hermens DF, Hickie IB, Killackey E, McGorry P, Pantelis C, Wood SJ, Purcell R (2017) Substance use in youth at risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res 181:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB (2010) Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 7(7):e1000316–e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Catty J, Lissouba P, White S, Becker T, Drake RE, Fioritti A, Knapp M, Lauber C, Rössler W, Tomov T, van Busschbach J, Wiersma D, Burns T (2008) Predictors of employment for people with severe mental illness: results of an international six-centre randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 192(3):224–231. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Census of Population and Housing: Estimating Homelessness, in 2049.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.

  48. Padgett DK (2020) Homelessness, housing instability and mental health: making the connections. B J Psych Bull 44(5):197–201

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hall WD, Patton G, Stockings E, Weier M, Lynskey M, Morley KI, Degenhardt L (2016) Why young people’s substance use matters for global health. Lancet Psychiatry 3(3):265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Windle M (2016) Drinking over the lifespan: focus on early adolescents and youth. Alcohol Res Curr Rev 38(1):95

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patton GC, Coffey C, Lynskey MT, Reid S, Hemphill S, Carlin JB, Hall W (2007) Trajectories of adolescent alcohol and cannabis use into young adulthood. Addiction 102(4):607–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01728.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Purcell R, Jorm AF, Hickie IB, Yung AR, Pantelis C, Amminger GP, Glozier N, Killackey E, Phillips LJ, Wood SJ, Harrigan S, Mackinnon A, Scott E, Hermens DF, Guastella AJ, Kenyon A, Mundy L, Nichles A, Scaffidi A, Spiliotacopoulos D, Taylor L, Tong JP, Wiltink S, Zmicerevska N, McGorry PD (2015) Demographic and clinical characteristics of young people seeking help at youth mental health services: baseline findings of the Transitions Study. Early Intervent Psychiatry 9(6):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hamilton BA, Naismith SL, Scott EM, Purcell S, Hickie IB (2011) Disability is already pronounced in young people with early stages of affective disorders: data from an early intervention service. J Affect Disord 131(1–3):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.10.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hermens DF, Scott EM, White D, Lynch M, Lagopoulos J, Whitwell BG, Naismith SL, Hickie IB (2013) Frequent alcohol, nicotine or cannabis use is common in young persons presenting for mental healthcare: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002229

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Holloway EM, Rickwood D, Rehm IC, Meyer D, Griffiths S, Telford N (2018) Non-participation in education, employment, and training among young people accessing youth mental health services: demographic and clinical correlates. Adv Mental Health 16(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2017.1342553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Iorfino F, Davenport TA, Ospina-Pinillos L, Hermens DF, Cross S, Burns J, Hickie IB (2017) Using new and emerging technologies to identify and respond to suicidality among help-seeking young people: a cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 19(7):e247. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. headspace (2017) headspace Annual Report: 2016–17. headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, Australia

  58. headspace (2018) headspace Annual Report 2017–18. headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, Australia

Download references

Acknowledgements

This was a joint project between Orygen; Centre for Youth Mental Health (University of Melbourne) and headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation. We thank Dr. Sharnel Perera for her contributions in many aspects of the project and the team of research assistants involved in collecting the data. We thank the headspace centre staff and young people whose participation made this study possible.

Funding

This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (Grant no. APP1076940).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Filia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filia, K., Rickwood, D., Menssink, J. et al. Clinical and functional characteristics of a subsample of young people presenting for primary mental healthcare at headspace services across Australia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 56, 1311–1323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-02020-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-02020-6

Keywords

Navigation