Advertisement

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 157–170 | Cite as

The relationship between neighborhood-level socioeconomic characteristics and individual mental disorders in five cities in Latin America: multilevel models from the World Mental Health Surveys

  • Laura SampsonEmail author
  • Silvia S. Martins
  • Shui Yu
  • Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho
  • Laura Helena Andrade
  • Maria Carmen Viana
  • Maria Elena Medina-Mora
  • Corina Benjet
  • Yolanda Torres
  • Marina Piazza
  • Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola
  • Alfredo H. Cia
  • Juan Carlos Stagnaro
  • Alan M. Zaslavsky
  • Ronald C. Kessler
  • Sandro Galea
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

Our understanding of community-level predictors of individual mental disorders in large urban areas of lower income countries is limited. In particular, the proportion of migrant, unemployed, and poorly educated residents in neighborhoods of these urban areas may characterize group contexts and shape residents’ health.

Methods

Cross-sectional household interviews of 7251 adults were completed across 83 neighborhoods of Buenos Aires, Argentina; Medellín, Colombia; São Paulo, Brazil; Lima, Peru; and Mexico City, Mexico as part of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Past-year internalizing and externalizing mental disorders were assessed, and multilevel models were used.

Results

Living in neighborhoods with either an above-average or below-average proportion of migrants and highly educated residents was associated with lower odds of any internalizing disorder (for proportion migrants: OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.91 for the bottom tertile and OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67–0.94 for the top tertile compared to the middle tertile; for proportion highly educated: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.90 for the bottom tertile and OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.90 for the top tertile compared to the middle tertile). Living in neighborhoods with an above-average proportion of unemployed individuals was associated with higher odds of having any internalizing disorder (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.14–1.95 for the top tertile compared to the middle tertile). The proportion of highly educated residents was associated with lower odds of externalizing disorder (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31–0.93 for the top tertile compared to the middle tertile).

Conclusions

The associations of neighborhood-level migration, unemployment, and education with individual-level odds of mental disorders highlight the importance of community context for understanding the burden of mental disorders among residents of rapidly urbanizing global settings.

Keywords

Urban health Neighborhood effects Internalizing disorders Externalizing disorders Latin America 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out in conjunction with the World Health Organization World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative which is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; R01 MH070884), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Pfizer Foundation, the US Public Health Service (R13-MH066849, R01-MH069864, and R01 DA016558), the Fogarty International Center (FIRCA R03-TW006481), the Pan American Health Organization, Eli Lilly and Company, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. We thank the staff of the WMH Data Collection and Data Analysis Coordination Centers for assistance with instrumentation, fieldwork, and consultation on data analysis. None of the funders had any role in the design, analysis, interpretation of results, or preparation of this paper. A complete list of all within-country and cross-national WMH publications can be found at http://www.hcp.med.harvard.edu/wmh/. The Argentina survey—Estudio Argentino de Epidemiología en Salud Mental (EAESM)—was supported by a grant from the Argentinian Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Salud de la Nación). The São Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey is supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) Thematic Project Grant 03/00204-. The Mental Health Study Medellín—Colombia was carried out and supported jointly by the Center for Excellence on Research in Mental Health (CES University) and the Secretary of Health of Medellín. The Mexican National Comorbidity Survey (M-NCS) is supported by The National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM/DIES 4280) and by the National Council on Science and Technology (CONACyT-G30544-H), with supplemental support from the PanAmerican Health Organization (PAHO). The Peruvian World Mental Health Study was funded by the National Institute of Health of the Ministry of Health of Peru. Dr. Laura Helena Andrade is supported by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Grant # 307784/2016-9) and the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP; Project Saúde mental, migração e São Paulo Megacity—M3SP; Grant16/50307-3).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

In the past 3 years, Dr. Kessler received support for his epidemiological studies from Sanofi Aventis; was a consultant for Johnson & Johnson Wellness and Prevention, Sage Pharmaceuticals, Shire, Takeda; and served on an advisory board for the Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. Lake Nona Life Project. Kessler is a co-owner of DataStat, Inc., a market research firm that carries out healthcare research. Other authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose.

Supplementary material

127_2018_1595_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 52 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Pan American Health Organization WHO (2013) WHO-AIMS: report on mental health systems in Latin America and the Caribbean. Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC. https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2013/ENG-WHOAIMSREG-(For-Web-Apr-2013).pdf Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kohn R, Levav I, de Almeida JMC et al (2005) Mental disorders in Latin America and the Caribbean: a public health priority. Pan Am J Public Health 18:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrade LH, Wang Y-P, Andreoni S et al (2012) Mental disorders in megacities: findings from the São Paulo megacity mental health survey, Brazil. PLoS One 7:e31879.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031879 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medina-Mora ME, Borges G, Lara C et al (2005) Prevalence, service use, and demographic correlates of 12-month DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in Mexico: results from the Mexican National Comorbidity Survey. Psychol Med 35:1773–1783.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291705005672 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    (2014) United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. https://www.compassion.com/multimedia/world-urbanization-prospects.pdf
  6. 6.
    United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2012) State of Latin American and Caribbean Cities. UN-Habitat, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vlahov D, Galea S, Gibble E, Freudenberg N (2005) Perspectives on urban conditions and population health. Cad Saude Publica 21:949–957.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000300031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luciano M, De Rosa C, Vecchio V, Del et al (2016) Perceived insecurity, mental health and urbanization: results from a multicentric study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 62:252–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peen J, Schoevers RA, Beekman AT, Dekker J (2010) The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 121:84–93.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01438.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kovess-Masfety V, Lecoutour X, Delavelle S (2005) Mood disorders and urban/rural settings. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:613–618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0934-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Heal 55:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiavegatto Filho ADP, Sampson L, Martins SS et al (2017) Neighbourhood characteristics and mental disorders in three Chinese cities: multilevel models from the World Mental Health Surveys. BMJ Open 7:e017679.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017679 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonçalves DA, Mari J, de J, Bower P, et al (2014) Brazilian multicentre study of common mental disorders in primary care: rates and related social and demographic factors. Cad Saude Publica 30:623–632.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00158412 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvarado BE, Zunzunegui MV, Béland F et al (2007) Social and gender inequalities in depressive symptoms among urban older adults of latin america and the Caribbean. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 62:S226–S236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Araya R, Rojas G, Fritsch R et al (2001) Common mental disorders in Santiago, Chile. Br J Psychiatry 178:228–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruiz-Grosso P, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Diez-Canseco F et al (2015) Depressive mood among within-country migrants in Periurban Shantytowns of Lima, Peru. J Immigr Minor Heal 17:1635–1642.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0121-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harpham T, Grant E, Rodriguez C (2004) Mental health and social capital in Cali, Colombia. Soc Sci Med 58:2267–2277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sánchez Mojica BE (2013) A city torn apart: forced displacement in Medellin, Colombia. Int Law Rev Colomb Derecho Int 22:179–210Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vlahov D, Galea S (2002) Urbanization, urbanicity, and health. J Urban Health 79:S1–S12.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/79.suppl_1.s1 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paykel E, Abbott R, Jenkins R et al (2003) Urban-rural mental health differences in Great Britain: findings from the National Morbidity Survey. Int Rev Psychiatry 15:97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0954026021000046001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soares RR, Naritomi J (2010) Understanding high crime rates in Latin America: the role of social and policy factors. In: Di Tella R, Edwards S, Schargrodsky E (eds) The economics of crime: lessons for and from Latin America. National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 19–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramos L, Britto M (2004) The functioning of the Brazilian metropolitan labor market in the period 1991–2002: trends, stylized facts and structural changes. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Campo P, Gielen AC, Faden RR et al (1995) Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health 85:1092–1097.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.85.8_PT_1.1092 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silver E, Mulvey EP, Swanson JW (2002) Neighborhood structural characteristics and mental disorder: Faris and Dunham revisited. Soc Sci Med 55:1457–1470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Silveira CM, Siu ER, Anthony JC et al (2014) Drinking patterns and alcohol use disorders in São Paulo, Brazil: the role of neighborhood social deprivation and socioeconomic status. PLoS One 9:e108355.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108355 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orozco R, Benjet C, Ruiz Velasco-Acosta S et al (2017) Area-level disadvantage and alcohol use disorder in northern Mexico. Drug Alcohol Depend 175:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.02.011 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kawachi I, Takao S, Subramanian SV (2013) Global perspectives on social capital and health. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang W, Chen Q, McCubbin H et al (2011) Predictors of mental and physical health: individual and neighborhood levels of education, social well-being, and ethnicity. Health Place 17:238–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krueger RF, McGue M, Iacono WG (2001) The higher-order structure of common DSM mental disorders: internalization, externalization, and their connections to personality. Pers Individ Differ 30:1245–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00106-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Piazza M, Fiestas F (2014) Annual prevalence of mental disorders and use of mental health services in Peru: results of the World Mental Health Survey, 2005. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 31:30–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Viana MC, Teixeira MG, Beraldi F et al (2009) São Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey—a population-based epidemiological study of psychiatric morbidity in the São Paulo metropolitan area: aims, design and field implementation. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 31:375–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harkness J, Pennell BE, Villar A et al (2008) Translation procedures and translation assessment in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. In: Kessler RC, Üstün TB (eds) The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 91–113Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heeringa SG, Wells EJ, Hubbard F et al (2008) Sample designs and sampling procedures. In: Kessler RC, Üstün TB (eds) The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 14–32Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kessler RC, Ustün TB (2004) The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 13:93–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (2002) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P). Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haro JM, Arbabzadeh-Bouchez S, Brugha TS et al (2006) Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 15:167–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Palloni A, Ewbank DC (2004) Selection process in the study of racial and ethnic differentials in adult health and mortality. In: Anderson NB, Bulatao RA, Cohen B (eds) Critical perspectives on racial and ethnic differences in health in late life. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 177–226Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2001) Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health 78:458–467CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Paykel ES (1994) Life events, Social support and depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 89:50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb05803.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Emerson SD, Minh A, Guhn M (2018) Ethnic density of regions and psychiatric disorders among ethnic minority individuals. Int J Soc Psychiatry 64:130–144.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017747909 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hong S, Zhang W, Walton E (2014) Neighborhoods and mental health: Exploring ethnic density, poverty, and social cohesion among Asian Americans and Latinos. Soc Sci Med 111:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.014 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bécares L, Nazroo J, Stafford M (2009) The buffering effects of ethnic density on experienced racism and health. Health Place 15:700–708.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2008.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE et al (1992) Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science 255:946–952.  https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1546291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Sampson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Silvia S. Martins
    • 2
  • Shui Yu
    • 1
  • Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho
    • 3
  • Laura Helena Andrade
    • 4
  • Maria Carmen Viana
    • 5
  • Maria Elena Medina-Mora
    • 6
  • Corina Benjet
    • 6
  • Yolanda Torres
    • 7
  • Marina Piazza
    • 8
  • Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola
    • 9
  • Alfredo H. Cia
    • 10
  • Juan Carlos Stagnaro
    • 11
  • Alan M. Zaslavsky
    • 12
  • Ronald C. Kessler
    • 12
  • Sandro Galea
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyColumbia University Mailman School of Public HealthNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologySchool of Public Health of the University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Nucleo de Epidemiologia Psiquiatrica LIM-23, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das ClinicasFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  5. 5.Department of Social Medicine, Postgraduate Program in Public HealthFederal University of Espirito SantoVitóriaBrazil
  6. 6.Department of Epidemiology and Psychosocial ResearchNational Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz, CalzadaMexico CityMexico
  7. 7.Center of Excellence in Mental Health ResearchCES UniversityMedellínColombia
  8. 8.Universidad Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru, and National Institute of HealthLimaPeru
  9. 9.Center for Reducing Health DisparitiesUniversity of California, Davis School of MedicineSacramentoUSA
  10. 10.Anxiety Disorders Clinic and Research CenterBuenos AiresArgentina
  11. 11.Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  12. 12.Department of Health Care PolicyHarvard University Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations