Gender discrimination, educational attainment, and illicit drug use among U.S. women
- 580 Downloads
While gender inequality has been a topic of concern for decades, little is known about the relationship between gender discrimination and illicit drug use. Further, whether this association varies by education level is unknown.
Among 19,209 women participants in Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2004–2005), we used logistic regression to test the association between gender discrimination (measured with four items from the Experiences of Discrimination instrument) and three outcomes: past-year illicit drug use, frequent drug use, and drug use disorders. We then tested whether associations differed by education level.
Gender discrimination was reported by 9% of women and was associated with past-year drug use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.17–3.29], frequent drug use (aOR = 2.82; CI 1.99–4.00), and past-year drug use disorders (aOR = 3.15; CI 2.16–4.61). All specific domains of gender discrimination (on the job, in public, with institutions, being called a sexist name) were associated with all drug use outcomes. The association between gender discrimination and past-year drug use was stronger among women with less than a high school education (aOR = 6.33; CI 3.38–11.85) compared to those with more education (aOR = 2.45; CI 1.97–3.04; p interaction < 0.01).
Gender discrimination is consistently and strongly associated with illicit drug use and drug use disorders among U.S. women, with significantly higher odds for drug use among women with less than a high school education. Future research should examine whether explicitly addressing distress from discrimination could benefit women in drug treatment, especially among clients with lower educational attainment.
KeywordsSex discrimination Gender Drug use disorders Psychological stress Educational status
The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) with supplemental support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). This study was supported in part by NIDA Grant #T32DA031099 (HC; PI: DSH), New York State Psychiatric Institute, and the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology (DSH).
Compliance with ethical standards
Informed consent was obtained for participation and study procedures were approved by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. Human subjects research approval for the NESARC study was granted by the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Pew Research Center (2015) Women and leadership: public says women are equally qualified, but barriers persist, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hymowitz C, Schellhardt TD (1986) The glass ceiling: why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. Wall Street J 24:1Google Scholar
- 4.Crosby FJ, Stockdale MS, Ropp SA (2007) Sex discrimination in the workplace: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- 5.Institute for Women’s Policy Research (2015) Women’s Median Earnings as a Percent of Men’s Median Earnings, 1960–2014 (No. Q041). , Institute for Women’s Policy Research., Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- 6.Berke R (1991) the thomas nomination; panel to hear allegations starting Friday, in The New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 7.Grynbaum M, Koblin J (2016) Gretchen Carlson of fox news files harassment suit against Roger Ailes, in The New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Twohey M, Barbaro M (2016) Two women say Donald Trump touched them inappropriately, in The New York Times, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 12.Landrine H, Klonoff EAA (1997) Discrimination against women: Prevalence, consequences, remedies. Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- 16.Krieger N et al (1993) Racism, sexism, and social class: implications for studies of health, disease, and well-being. Am J Prevent Med 9(6, Suppl):82–122Google Scholar
- 24.Gilbert PA, Zemore SE (2016) Discrimination and drinking: a systematic review of the evidence. Social Sci MedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Carr ER, Szymanski DM (2010) Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. Couns Psychol p. 0011000010378449Google Scholar
- 35.Jackson PB, Williams DR (2006) The intersection of race, gender, and ses: health paradoxesGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ross CE, Wu C (1995) The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 719–745Google Scholar
- 40.Sen G, Ostlin P, George A (2007) Unequal unfair ineffective and inefficient. Gender inequity in health: Why it exists and how we can change it. Final report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 45.Ross CE, Mirowsky J (2013) The sense of personal control: social structural causes and emotional consequences. In: Aneshensel CS, Phelan JC, Bierman A (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. pp 379–402Google Scholar
- 46.Mooney CJ et al (2016) Perceived control mediates effects of socioeconomic status and chronic stress on physical frailty: findings from the health and retirement study. J Gerontol Series B Psychol Sci Soc SciGoogle Scholar
- 51.Grant BF et al (2003) The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 71(1):7–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 57.Jaeger DA, Page ME (1996) Degrees matter: New evidence on sheepskin effects in the returns to education. Rev Econ Stat pp 733–740Google Scholar
- 62.Research Triangle Institute, SUDAAN language manual, volumes 1 and 2, Release 11. 2012, Research Triangle Institute: Research Triangle Park, NCGoogle Scholar
- 65.Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU (1995) Strategies for measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and physical disorders. A guide for health and social scientists, Measuring stress, pp 3–26Google Scholar
- 70.Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U Chi Legal F p 139Google Scholar
- 74.Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, coping and adaptation. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar