Skip to main content
Log in

Update Erstlinien- und Rezidivchemotherapie beim Hodentumor

Update on first-line and relapse chemotherapy for testicular cancer

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Keimzelltumoren bleiben mit steigender Inzidenz auch aktuell die häufigste Tumorerkrankung des Mannes im Alter zwischen 20 und 45 Jahren. Die konsequente Anwendung stadiengerecht durchgeführter Therapiekonzepte hat dadurch zu einer Heilungsrate von etwa 88 % über alle Tumorstadien hinweg geführt. Dabei sind der Einsatz von Chirurgie, Strahlentherapie und Chemotherapie, die Auswahl der erforderlichen Medikamente sowie die Art und Dauer ihrer Anwendung durch internationale Konsensusempfehlungen genau festgelegt. Diese orientieren sich an der Histologie, am jeweiligen Tumorstadium und am Vorhandensein bekannter und gut untersuchter Risikofaktoren. Diese strikten Vorgaben sollen sicherstellen, dass für jeden Patienten die optimale Heilungschance mit der für ihn am wenigsten belastenden Therapie erzielt wird.

In der Primärtherapie früher und lokal begrenzter Tumorstadien bedeutet dies eine sorgfältige Abwägung zwischen den Nebenwirkungen einer oft nur adjuvanten Therapie und der zu erwartenden Rezidivgefahr gegenüber einer alleinigen Nachsorgestrategie. Für die weiter fortgeschrittenen metastasierten Tumorstadien bedeutet dies die Entscheidung für die optimale Sequenz von Chemotherapie, Operation oder Bestrahlung. Eine besondere Herausforderung stellen Therapieentscheidungen bei den seltenen Rezidiven nach primärer Chemotherapie dar. In diesem klinischen Kontext ist eine an Prognosefaktoren orientierte, risikoadaptierte Vorgehensweise von besonderer Bedeutung. Auch hier muss die höhere Rate an Therapieversagen gegenüber den meist toxischen Therapiekonzepten sorgfältig abgewogen werden.

Die Vernachlässigung anerkannter Therapiestandards in der Behandlung von Patienten mit Keimzelltumoren führt sowohl in der Primär- als auch in der Rezidivtherapie zu einer höheren Rate an Therapieversagen mit der Notwendigkeit von Folgetherapien oder oft sogar auch mit dem Tod eines Patienten. Noch immer sterben in Deutschland Patienten an Keimzelltumoren, ohne dass sie jemals eine Chance auf eine adäquat durchgeführte Therapie hatten.

Abstract

Germ-cell cancer (GCC) is still the most common cancer diagnosis in men between the ages of 20 and 45 years with an increasing incidence. Due to effective and standardized algorithms that have been developed to stratify patients into different risk groups, remarkable progress has been made in the medical treatment of testicular cancer with an overall cure rate of 88%. The application of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the choice of chemotherapy agents as well as treatment duration is defined in international consensus guidelines. The guidelines are based on histology, tumor stages and presence or absence of already known and well-established risk factors. These stringent parameters guarantee the optimal curative treatment options for each GCC patient and can avoid overtreatment as well as undertreatment.

For patients with early stage disease, careful consideration between possible side effects due to an adjuvant therapy and the expected relapse rate must be made, whereas in advanced tumor stages the optimal sequence of chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy is the focus. In patients who progress or relapse after first-line therapy, the issue of optimal treatment represents a particular challenge and is far more complex. It needs to take into account the analysis of special prognostic variables for a further risk-tailored therapy. A careful weighting between the chosen regimen and the often higher rate of treatment failure in contrast to increased toxic side-effects is mandatory.

The disregard of accurate risk stratification and application of accepted treatment standards for patients with GCC at the time of initial diagnosis or at relapse is associated with developing more extensive disease and more intensive treatment. It also results in lower cure rates with the need for further therapy or leads to death of the patient without ever having had a chance for cure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Albers P (2006) Surgery is an essential part of salvage treatment in refractory germ cell tumors. Eur Urol 50:893–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albers P, Siener R, Krege S et al (2008) Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I Nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 26:2966–2972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1997) International germ cell consensus classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 15:594–603

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous (2010) Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors who experienced treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:4906–4911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beyer J, Albers P, Altena R et al (2012) Maintaining success, reducing treatment burden, focusing on survivorship: highlights from the third European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ-cell cancer. Ann Oncol 10(6):1212–1224

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K, Honecker F et al (2008) Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ-cell tumors: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 19:448–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosl GJ, Motzer RJ (1997) Testicular germ-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 337:242–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper MA, Einhorn LH (1995) Maintenance chemotherapy with daily oral etoposide following salvage therapy in patients with germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 13:1167–1169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daugaard G, Skoneczna I, Aass N et al (2011) A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974). Ann Oncol 22:1054–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Wit R, Skoneczna I, Daugaard G et al (2012) Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel-bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) to standard BEP in intermediate-prognosis germ-cell cancer: intergroup study EORTC 30983. J Clin Oncol 30:792–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Einhorn LH, Donohue JP (1977) Chemotherapy for disseminated testicular cancer. Urol Clin North Am 4:407–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Einhorn LH, Williams SD, Chamness A et al (2007) High-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue for metastatic germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med 357:340–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman DR, Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J et al (2008) Medical treatment of advanced testicular cancer. JAMA 299:672–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman DR, Hu J, Dorff TB et al (2013) Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) efficacy for first-line treatment of patients (pts) with intermediate- or poor-risk germ cell tumors (GCT). ASCO Meeting Abstracts 31:4501

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fizazi K, Pagliaro LC, Flechon A et al (2013) A phase III trial of personalized chemotherapy based on serum tumor marker decline in poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors: results of GETUG 13. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 31:4500

    Google Scholar 

  16. Flechon A, Tavernier E, Boyle H et al (2010) Long-term oncological outcome after post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumour. BJU Int 106:779–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kollmannsberger CK, Tandstad T, Bedard PL et al (2013) Characterization of relapse in patients with clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS-TC) managed with active surveillance (AS): a large multicenter study. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 31:4503

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R et al (2008) European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 53:478–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorch A, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2011) Conventional-dose versus high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment in male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors: evidence from a large international database. J Clin Oncol 29:2178–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorch A, Kleinhans A, Kramar A et al (2012) Sequential versus single high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 30:800–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorch A, Neubauer A, Hackenthal M et al (2010) High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment in patients with multiple relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol 21:820–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorch A, Rick O, Wundisch T et al (2010) High dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment for unresectable late relapse germ cell tumors. J Urol 184:168–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortensen MS, Gundgaard MG, Lauritsen J et al (2013) A nationwide cohort study of surveillance for stage I seminoma. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 31:4502

    Google Scholar 

  24. Motzer RJ, Nichols CJ, Margolin KA et al (2007) Phase III randomized trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue as first-line treatment for patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 25:247–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nichols CR, Tricot G, Williams SD et al (1989) Dose-intensive chemotherapy in refractory germ cell cancer – a phase I/II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 7:932–939

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oldenburg J, Lorch A, Fossa SD (2011) Late relapse of germ cell tumors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 25:615–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oliver RT, Ong J, Shamash J et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Group surveillance versus patients with Stage 1 nonseminoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Urology 63:556–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pico JL, Rosti G, Kramar A et al (2005) A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours. Ann Oncol 16:1152–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Powles T, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2013) Prognostic impact of LDH levels in patients with relapsed/refractory seminoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139:1311–1316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schirren J, Trainer S, Eberlein M et al (2012) The role of residual tumor resection in the management of nonseminomatous germ cell cancer of testicular origin. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60(6):405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmoll HJ, Kollmannsberger C, Metzner B et al (2003) Long-term results of first-line sequential high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell support for patients with advanced metastatic germ cell cancer: an extended phase I/II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4083–4091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stephenson AJ, Bosl GJ, Bajorin DF et al (2005) Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with low stage testicular cancer with embryonal carcinoma predominance and/or lymphovascular invasion. J Urol 174:557–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tandstad T, Dahl O, Cohn-Cedermark G et al (2009) Risk-adapted treatment in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer: the SWENOTECA management program. J Clin Oncol 27:2122–2128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Warde P, Specht L, Horwich A et al (2002) Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 20:4448–4452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. A. Lorch und P. Albers geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lorch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorch, A., Albers, P. Update Erstlinien- und Rezidivchemotherapie beim Hodentumor. Urologe 52, 1547–1555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3251-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3251-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation