The Science of Nature

, 104:31 | Cite as

Insights into the role of age and social interactions on the sexual attractiveness of queens in an eusocial bee, Melipona flavolineata (Apidae, Meliponini)

  • Jamille Costa Veiga
  • Cristiano Menezes
  • Felipe Andrés León Contrera
Original Paper


The attraction of sexual partners is a vital necessity among insects, and it involves conflict of interests and complex communication systems among male and female. In this study, we investigated the developing of sexual attractiveness in virgin queens (i.e., gynes) of Melipona flavolineata, an eusocial stingless bee. We followed the development of sexual attractiveness in 64 gynes, belonging to seven age classes (0, 3, 6, 9, 15, 18 days post-emergence), and we also evaluated the effect of different social interactions (such as competition between queens and interactions with workers) on the development of attractiveness in other 60 gynes. We used the number of males that tried to mate with a focal gyne as a representative variable of its sexual attractiveness. During the essays, each gyne was individually presented to 10 sexually mature males, and during 3 min, we counted the number of males that everted their genitalia in response to the presence of a gyne. Here, we show that M. flavolineata gynes are capable to (i) maintain their sexual attractiveness for long periods through adult life, (ii) they need a minimum social interaction to trigger the development of sexual attractiveness, and (iii) that gynes express this trait only within a social context. We conclude that the effective occurrence of matings is conditional on potential social interactions that gynes experienced before taking the nuptial flight, when they are still in the nest. These findings bring insights into the factors determining reproductive success in social insects.


Reproduction Mating Social contact Virgin queens Stingless bees 



We thank MSc. Ana Carolina Martins de Queiroz, MSc. Kamila Leão Leão, and MSc. Epifânia Emanuela de Macêdo Rocha for assistance during the experiments. We also thank Dr. Ayrton Vollet Neto for providing critical reading of early drafts of the manuscript, Dr. Alistair Campbell for linguistic advice, and the anonymous referees for the valuable comments which really improved this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards


This study was funded by CNPq (479710/2011-2, 400435/2014-4) and FAPESPA (ICAAF 30/2011). JCV was funded by CAPES (CAPES/EMBRAPA 15/2014).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

114_2017_1450_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2312 kb).
114_2017_1450_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (98 mb)
ESM 2 Behaviors performed by dominant Melipona flavolineata gynes (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): the video starts by presenting a dominant gyne, which is not attacked. In sequence, we show a non-dominant gyne, killed by workers and thrown in the nest’s garbage area. We also show the behaviors related to dominance-subordination mechanism, with emphasis on the interactions with workers. (MP4 100,331 kb).


  1. Alcock J (2001) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach, 7th edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsalem E, Hefetz A (2010) The appeasement effect of sterility signaling in dominance contests among Bombus terrestris workers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1685–1694. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-0982-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bespalova I, Helms K (2014) Social selection and the evolution of a female weapon in queens of the ant Messor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biol J Linn Soc 113:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camargo CA (1972) Mating of the social bee Melipona quadrifasciata under controlled conditions (Hymenoptera, Apidae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 45:520–523Google Scholar
  5. Châline N, Ratnieks FLW, Raine NE et al (2004) Non-lethal sampling of honey bee, Apis mellifera, DNA using wing tips. Apidologie 35:311–318. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. da Silva DN, Zucchi R, Kerr W (1972) Biological and behavioural aspects of the reproduction in some species of Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Anim Behav 20:123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. de Souza EA, Neves CA, Campos LA de O et al (2007) Effect of mating delay on the ovary of Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queens. Micron 38:471–477. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2006.08.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson AE (1939) Populations of social insects. Ecol Monogr 9:287–300. doi: 10.2307/1943230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engels E, Engels W (1988) Age-dependent queen attractiveness for drones and mating in the stingless bee, Scaptotrigona postica. J Apic Res 27:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engels W, Engels E, Francke W (1997) Ontogeny of cephalic volatile patterns in queens and mating biology of the neotropical stingless bee, Scaptotrigona postica. Invertebr Reprod Dev 31:251–256. doi: 10.1080/07924259.1997.9672583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Engelsdorp D, Hayes J, Underwood RM, Pettis J (2008) A survey of honey bee colony losses in the U.S., fall 2007 to spring 2008. PLoS One 3:e4071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fewell JH, Page RE (1999) The emergence of division of labour in forced associations of normally solitary ant queens. Evol Ecol Res 1:537–548Google Scholar
  13. Fierro MM, Cruz-López L, Sánchez D et al (2011) Queen volatiles as a modulator of Tetragonisca angustula drone behavior. J Chem Ecol 37:1255–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster KR, Seppä P, Ratnieks FLW, Thorén PA (1999) Low paternity in the hornet Vespa crabro indicates that multiple mating by queens is derived in vespine wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:252–257. doi: 10.1007/s002650050617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster RL, Brunskill A, Verdirame D, O’Donnell S (2004) Reproductive physiology, dominance interactions, and division of labour among bumble bee workers. Physiol Entomol 29:327–334. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00388.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gans C (1987) The sensory world of animals. In: Hoage R (ed) Animal intelligence. Insights into the animal mind. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  17. Gilley DC, Tarpy DR (2005) Three mechanisms of queen elimination in swarming honey bee colonies. Apidologie 36:461–474. doi: 10.1051/apido:2005033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilley DC, Tarpy DR, Land BB (2003) Effect of queen quality on interactions between workers and dueling queens in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:190–196. doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0708-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grajales-Conesa J, Rojas JC, Guzman-Diaz M (2006) Cephalic and Dufour gland secretions of Scaptotrigona mexicana queens: chemical composition and biological activity. Apidologie 38:38–46. doi: 10.1051/apido CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartfelder K, Marker GR, Judice CC et al (2006) Physiological and genetic mechanisms underlying caste development, reproduction and division of labor in stingless bees. Apidologie 37:144–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Human H, Brodschneider R, Dietemann V et al (2013) Miscellaneous standard methods for Apis mellifera research. J Apic Res 52:1–53. doi: 10.3896/IBRA. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Zucchi R (1995) Virgin queens in stingless bee (Apidae, Meliponinae) colonies: a review. Apidologie 26:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Matos ET, Ferreira F, Velthuis HHW (1998) A case of multiple mating in stingless bees (Meliponinae). Insect Soc 45:231–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jarau S, Van Veen JW, Aguilar I, Ayasse M (2009) Virgin queen execution in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii: the sign stimulus for worker attacks. Apidologie 40:496–507. doi: 10.1051/apido/2009022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jarau S, van Veen JW, Aguilar I, Ayasse M (2010) A scientific note on virgin queen acceptance in stingless bees: evidence for the importance of queen aggression. Apidologie 41:38–39. doi: 10.1051/apido/2009045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kärcher MH, Menezes C, Alves DA et al (2013) Factors influencing survival duration and choice of virgin queens in the stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata. Naturwissenschaften 100:571–580. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1053-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerr WE (1950) Genetic determination of castes in the genus Melipona. Genetics 35(2):143–152Google Scholar
  28. Koedam D, Aguilar Monge I, Sommeijer MJ (1995) Social interactions of gynes and their longevity in queenright colonies of Melipona favosa (Apidae: Meliponinae). Netherlands J Zool 45:480–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korb J, Heinze J (2004) Multilevel selection and social evolution of insect societies. Naturwissenschaften 91:291–304. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0529-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lebreton S, Trona F, Borrero-Echeverry F et al (2015) Feeding regulates sex pheromone attraction and courtship in Drosophila females. Sci Rep 5:13132. doi: 10.1038/srep13132 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin N, Michener CD (1972) Evolution of sociality in insects. Q Rev Biol 47:131–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michener C (2007) The bees of the world, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  33. de Moraes BC, da Costa JMN, da Costa ACL, Costa MH (2005) Variação espacial e temporal da precipitação no Estado do Pará. Acta Amaz 35:207–214. doi: 10.1590/S0044-59672005000200010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pedro SRM (2014) The stingless bee fauna in Brazil (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 61:348–354. doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.348-354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pettis JS, Rice N, Joselow K et al (2016) Colony failure linked to low sperm viability in honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens and an exploration of potential causative factors. PLoS One 11:e0147220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147220 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan MJ (1997) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 179–202Google Scholar
  37. Siegel SC, Castellan NJ Jr (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Sommeijer MJ, Bruijn LLM, Meeuwsen JAJ, Slaa J (2003) Reproductive behaviour of stingless bees: nest departures of non-accepted gynes and nuptial flights in Melipona favosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini). Entomol Ber 63:7–13Google Scholar
  39. Tarpy DR, Gilley DC, Seeley TD (2004) Levels of selection in a social insect: a review of conflict and cooperation during honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen replacement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:513–523. doi: 10.1007/s00265-003-0738-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tautz J (2008) The buzz about bees: biology of a superorganism. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Veen JW, Sommeijer MJ, Monge IA (1999) Behavioural development and abdomen inflation of gynes and newly mated queens of Melipona beecheii (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insect Soc 46:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Velthuis HHW, Vries HD, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (2006) The polygyny of Melipona bicolor: scramble competition among queens. Apidologie 37:222–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venturieri GC, de Raiol VFO, Pereira CAB (2003) Avaliação da introdução da criação racional de Melipona fasciculata (Apidae: Meliponina), entre os agricultores familiares de Bragança - PA, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–7. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032003000200003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Tragedy of the commons in Melipona bees. Proc R Soc London B 271:S310–S312. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wenseleers T, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW, Quezada-Euán JJG (2004) Queen execution and caste conflict in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii. Ethology 110:725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Zar J (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Pearson Education IndiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamille Costa Veiga
    • 1
  • Cristiano Menezes
    • 2
  • Felipe Andrés León Contrera
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Biologia e Ecologia de Abelhas, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal do ParáBelémBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de BotânicaEmbrapa Amazônia OrientalBelémBrazil

Personalised recommendations