The attraction of sexual partners is a vital necessity among insects, and it involves conflict of interests and complex communication systems among male and female. In this study, we investigated the developing of sexual attractiveness in virgin queens (i.e., gynes) of Melipona flavolineata, an eusocial stingless bee. We followed the development of sexual attractiveness in 64 gynes, belonging to seven age classes (0, 3, 6, 9, 15, 18 days post-emergence), and we also evaluated the effect of different social interactions (such as competition between queens and interactions with workers) on the development of attractiveness in other 60 gynes. We used the number of males that tried to mate with a focal gyne as a representative variable of its sexual attractiveness. During the essays, each gyne was individually presented to 10 sexually mature males, and during 3 min, we counted the number of males that everted their genitalia in response to the presence of a gyne. Here, we show that M. flavolineata gynes are capable to (i) maintain their sexual attractiveness for long periods through adult life, (ii) they need a minimum social interaction to trigger the development of sexual attractiveness, and (iii) that gynes express this trait only within a social context. We conclude that the effective occurrence of matings is conditional on potential social interactions that gynes experienced before taking the nuptial flight, when they are still in the nest. These findings bring insights into the factors determining reproductive success in social insects.
Reproduction Mating Social contact Virgin queens Stingless bees
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank MSc. Ana Carolina Martins de Queiroz, MSc. Kamila Leão Leão, and MSc. Epifânia Emanuela de Macêdo Rocha for assistance during the experiments. We also thank Dr. Ayrton Vollet Neto for providing critical reading of early drafts of the manuscript, Dr. Alistair Campbell for linguistic advice, and the anonymous referees for the valuable comments which really improved this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by CNPq (479710/2011-2, 400435/2014-4) and FAPESPA (ICAAF 30/2011). JCV was funded by CAPES (CAPES/EMBRAPA 15/2014).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
ESM 2Behaviors performed by dominant Melipona flavolineata gynes (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): the video starts by presenting a dominant gyne, which is not attacked. In sequence, we show a non-dominant gyne, killed by workers and thrown in the nest’s garbage area. We also show the behaviors related to dominance-subordination mechanism, with emphasis on the interactions with workers. (MP4 100,331 kb).
da Silva DN, Zucchi R, Kerr W (1972) Biological and behavioural aspects of the reproduction in some species of Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Anim Behav 20:123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fewell JH, Page RE (1999) The emergence of division of labour in forced associations of normally solitary ant queens. Evol Ecol Res 1:537–548Google Scholar
Fierro MM, Cruz-López L, Sánchez D et al (2011) Queen volatiles as a modulator of Tetragonisca angustula drone behavior. J Chem Ecol 37:1255–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Foster KR, Seppä P, Ratnieks FLW, Thorén PA (1999) Low paternity in the hornet Vespa crabro indicates that multiple mating by queens is derived in vespine wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:252–257. doi:10.1007/s002650050617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley DC, Tarpy DR, Land BB (2003) Effect of queen quality on interactions between workers and dueling queens in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:190–196. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0708-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajales-Conesa J, Rojas JC, Guzman-Diaz M (2006) Cephalic and Dufour gland secretions of Scaptotrigona mexicana queens: chemical composition and biological activity. Apidologie 38:38–46. doi:10.1051/apidoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartfelder K, Marker GR, Judice CC et al (2006) Physiological and genetic mechanisms underlying caste development, reproduction and division of labor in stingless bees. Apidologie 37:144–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Zucchi R (1995) Virgin queens in stingless bee (Apidae, Meliponinae) colonies: a review. Apidologie 26:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Matos ET, Ferreira F, Velthuis HHW (1998) A case of multiple mating in stingless bees (Meliponinae). Insect Soc 45:231–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarau S, Van Veen JW, Aguilar I, Ayasse M (2009) Virgin queen execution in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii: the sign stimulus for worker attacks. Apidologie 40:496–507. doi:10.1051/apido/2009022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarau S, van Veen JW, Aguilar I, Ayasse M (2010) A scientific note on virgin queen acceptance in stingless bees: evidence for the importance of queen aggression. Apidologie 41:38–39. doi:10.1051/apido/2009045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr WE (1950) Genetic determination of castes in the genus Melipona. Genetics 35(2):143–152Google Scholar
Koedam D, Aguilar Monge I, Sommeijer MJ (1995) Social interactions of gynes and their longevity in queenright colonies of Melipona favosa (Apidae: Meliponinae). Netherlands J Zool 45:480–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan MJ (1997) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 179–202Google Scholar
Siegel SC, Castellan NJ Jr (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Sommeijer MJ, Bruijn LLM, Meeuwsen JAJ, Slaa J (2003) Reproductive behaviour of stingless bees: nest departures of non-accepted gynes and nuptial flights in Melipona favosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponini). Entomol Ber 63:7–13Google Scholar
Tarpy DR, Gilley DC, Seeley TD (2004) Levels of selection in a social insect: a review of conflict and cooperation during honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen replacement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:513–523. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0738-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tautz J (2008) The buzz about bees: biology of a superorganism. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
Van Veen JW, Sommeijer MJ, Monge IA (1999) Behavioural development and abdomen inflation of gynes and newly mated queens of Melipona beecheii (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insect Soc 46:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis HHW, Vries HD, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (2006) The polygyny of Melipona bicolor: scramble competition among queens. Apidologie 37:222–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturieri GC, de Raiol VFO, Pereira CAB (2003) Avaliação da introdução da criação racional de Melipona fasciculata (Apidae: Meliponina), entre os agricultores familiares de Bragança - PA, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–7. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032003000200003CrossRefGoogle Scholar