The Science of Nature

, 104:27 | Cite as

Coherent array of branched filamentary scales along the wing margin of a small moth

  • Akihiro Yoshida
  • Shin Tejima
  • Masayuki Sakuma
  • Yositaka Sakamaki
  • Ryuji Kodama
Original Paper

Abstract

In butterflies and moths, the wing margins are fringed with specialized scales that are typically longer than common scales. In the hindwings of some small moths, the posterior margins are fringed with particularly long filamentary scales. Despite the small size of these moth wings, these scales are much longer than those of large moths and butterflies. In the current study, photography of the tethered flight of a small moth, Phthorimaea operculella, revealed a wide array composed of a large number of long filamentary scales. This array did not become disheveled in flight, maintaining a coherent sheet-like structure during wingbeat. Examination of the morphology of individual scales revealed that each filamentary scale consists of a proximal stalk and distal branches. Moreover, not only long scales but also shorter scales of various lengths were found to coexist in each small section of the wing margin. Scale branches were ubiquitously and densely distributed within the scale array to form a mesh-like architecture similar to a nonwoven fabric. We propose that possible mechanical interactions among branched filamentary scales, mediated by these branches, may contribute to maintaining a coherent sheet-like structure of the scale array during wingbeat.

Keywords

Small moth Wing margin Branched filamentary scale Mesh-like architecture Coherence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Hisao Honda and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the EM facility at the National Institute for Physiological Science (Okazaki, Japan).

Supplementary material

114_2017_1447_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (165 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1 (PPTX 165 kb)
114_2017_1447_MOESM2_ESM.docx (25 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

References

  1. Allyn AC, Rothschild M, Smith DS (1982) Microstructure of blue/green and yellow wing membranes in lepidoptera. With remarks concerning the function of pterobilins. 1. Genus Graphium. Bull Allyn Mus 75:1–19Google Scholar
  2. Brodsky AK (1994) The evolution of insect flight. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Downey JC, Allyn AC (1975) Wing-scale morphology and nomenclature. Bull Allyn Mus 31:1–32Google Scholar
  4. Foley DH (1985) Tethered flight of the potato moth, Phthorimaea opercula. Pysiol Entomol 10:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghiradella H (1998) Hairs, bristles, and scales. In: Locke M (ed) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrate. Volume 11A: Insecta. Hoboken, John Wiley and Sons, pp 257–287Google Scholar
  6. Ghiradella H (2010) Insect cuticular surface modifications: scales and other structural formations. Adv Insect Physiol 38:135–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirata K, Kubota T (1957) Microstructure of the scale of butterfly, Colias erate poliographus Motschulsky, elucidated by electron microscopy. Sci Rep Kagoshima Univ 6:151–167Google Scholar
  8. Ingram AL, Parker AR (2008) A review of the diversity and evolution of photonic structure in butterflies, incorporating the work of John Huxley (the Natural History Museum, London from 1961 to 1990). Phil Trans R Soc B 363:2465–2480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kozlov MV, Iranov VD, Grodnitsky DL (1986) Evolution of the wing apparatus and wing kinematics in Lepidoptera. Usephi sovr biol 101:291–305 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Nijout HF (1991) The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Smithsonian Inst Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Rasband WS (2016) ImageJ. US National Institute of Health, Bethesda , pp 1997–2016https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ Google Scholar
  12. Sakamaki Y, Akimoto S (1997) Wing shape of Gelechiid moths and its functions: analysis by elliptic Fourier transformation. Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sane PS (2003) The aerodynamics of insect flight. J Exp Biol 206:4191–4208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sugimoto M, Saigusa T (2002) Baeotia-like genus of the family Psychidae (Lepidoptera) from Taiwan, with a discussion on its systematic position. Trans Lepid Soc Japan 53:215–224Google Scholar
  15. Tejima S, Ono T, Sakuma M (2013) Aim-then-shoot anemotaxis involved in the hopping approach of potato tuber worm moth Phthorimaea opercula toward a sexpheromone source. Physiol Entomol 38:292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weis-Fogh T (1973) Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J Exp Biol 59:169–230Google Scholar
  17. Wooton RJ (1993) Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea). J Exp Biol 180:105–117Google Scholar
  18. Yoshida A, Motoyama M, Kosaku A, Miyamoto K (1997) Anti-reflective nanoprotuberance array in the transparent wing of a hawkmoth, Cephonodes hylas. Zool Sci 14:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yoshida A, Arita Y, Sakamaki Y, Watanabe K, Kodama R (1998) Transformation from the pupal to adult wing in a plume moth, Oidaematophorus hirosakianus (Matsumura) (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 91:852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akihiro Yoshida
    • 1
  • Shin Tejima
    • 2
  • Masayuki Sakuma
    • 2
  • Yositaka Sakamaki
    • 3
  • Ryuji Kodama
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of MorphodiversityNational Institute for Basic BiologyOkazakiJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Insect Physiology, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of AgricultureKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations