Flexibility in behavior can increase the likelihood that a forager may respond optimally in a fluctuating environment. Nevertheless, physiological or neuronal constraints may result in suboptimal responses to stimuli. We observed foraging workers of the giant tropical ant (also referred to as the “bullet ant”), Paraponera clavata, as they reacted to liquid solutions with varying concentrations of sugar and protein. We show that when protein/sucrose concentration is high, many bullet ants will often try to grasp at the droplet, rather than gather it by drinking. Because P. clavata actively hunt for prey, fixed action patterns and rapid responses to protein may be adaptively important, regardless of the medium in which it is presented. We conclude that, in P. clavata, food-handling decisions are made in response to the nutrient content of the food rather than the texture of the food. Further, we suggest that colonies that maintain a mixture of individuals with consistent fixed or flexible behavioral responses to food-handling decisions may be better adapted to fluctuating environmental conditions, and we propose future studies that could address this.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Breed MD, Bennett B (1985) Mass recruitment to nectar sources in Paraponera clavata: a field study. Insect Soc 32(2):198–208
Breed MD, Fewell JH, Moore AJ, Williams KR (1987) Graded recruitment in a ponerine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20(6):407–411
Breed MD, Stiller TM, Fewell JH, Harrison JM (1991) Intercolonial interactions and nestmate discrimination in the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata. Biotropica 23(3):301–306
Burns JG, Dyer AG (2008) Diversity of speed-accuracy strategies benefits social insects. Curr Biol 18(20):R953–R954
Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging by ants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:231–257
Cook SC, Behmer ST (2010) Macronutrient regulation in the tropical terrestrial ant Ectatomma ruidum (Formicidae): a field study in Costa Rica. Biotropica 42(2):135–139
Cook SC, Eubanks MD, Gold RE, Behmer ST (2011) Seasonality directs contrasting food collection behavior and nutrient regulation strategies in ants. PLoS One 6(9)
Dussutour A, Simpson SJ (2009) Communal nutrition in ants. Curr Biol 19(9):740–744
Dyer LA (2002) A quantification of predation rates, indirect positive effects on plants, and foraging variation of the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata. J Insect Sci 2(18):1–7
Dyer L, Floyd T (1993) Determinants of predation on phytophagous insects: the importance of diet breadth. Oecologia 96(4):575–582
Fewell JH, Harrison JF, Lighton JRB, Breed MD (1996) Foraging energetics of the ant, Paraponera clavata. Oecologia 105(4):419–427
Fritz G, Rand AS, dePamphilis CW (1981) The aposematically colored frog, Dendrobates pumilo, is distasteful to the large, predatory ant, Paraponera clavata. Biotropica 13(2):158–159
Hölldobler B (1985) Liquid food transmission and antennation signals in ponerine ants. Isr J Entomol 19:89–99
Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2013) Bumble bee response thresholds and body size: the amount of variation among workers may affect colony performance. Anim Behav (in press)
Jandt J, Taylor B, Jeanne R (2010) Temperature and forager body size affect carbohydrate collection in German yellowjackets, Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 57(3):275–283
Jandt JM, Bengston S, Pinter-Wollman N, Pruitt JN, Raine NE, Dornhaus A, Sih A (2013) Behavioural syndromes and social insects: personality at multiple levels. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. doi:10.1111/brv.12042
Kaspari M, Yanoviak SP (2001) Bait use in tropical litter and canopy ants—evidence of differences in nutrient limitation. Biotropica 33(1):207–211
Larson HK (2012) Dietary and Environmental Predictors of Rhizobiales Prevalence in the Bullet Ant, Paraponera clavata. Master’s Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA
Pernal SF, Currie RW (2001) The influence of pollen quality on foraging behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51(1):53–68
Pernal SF, Currie RW (2002) Discrimination and preferences for pollen-based cues by foraging honeybees, Apis mellifera L. Anim Behav 63:369–390
Scheiner R, Page RE, Erber J (2004) Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 35(2):133–142
Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tillberg CV, Breed MD (2004) Placing an omnivore in a complex food web: dietary contributions to adult biomass of an ant. Biotropica 36(2):266–272
For logistical support, we thank R. Vargas, B. Matarrita, D. Brenes, and O. Vargas, and the remaining staff of the Organization for Tropical Studies. We thank Amy Geffre for illustrating bullet ant feeding behaviors, and Sarah Bengston for help in editing the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant numbers OISE-0854259 and OISE-1130156).
Communicated by: Sven Thatje
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Jandt, J., Larson, H.K., Tellez, P. et al. To drink or grasp? How bullet ants (Paraponera clavata) differentiate between sugars and proteins in liquids. Naturwissenschaften 100, 1109–1114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1109-3
- Bullet ants
- Central place foraging
- Protein concentration
- Sugar concentration