Skip to main content
Log in

Status quo der Boden- und Luftrettung schwerverletzter Patienten

Analyse eines überregionalen Schweizer Traumazentrums

Deployment and efficacy of ground versus helicopter emergency service for severely injured patients

Analysis of a nationwide Swiss trauma center

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Unfallchirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der Einfluss des Transportmittels auf die Mortalität polytraumatisierter Patienten wird nach wie vor kontrovers diskutiert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde an 333 erwachsenen schwerverletzten Patienten, die innerhalb eines Jahres in ein Zentrumsspital in der Schweiz eingewiesen wurden, der Einfluss des Transportmittels auf ihre Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit untersucht. Der relativ neu etablierte RISC-Score (Revised Injury Severity Classification Score) fand als Zielgröße dabei Anwendung. Es konnte ein geringer, wenn auch nicht statistisch signifikanter Überlebensvorteil für Patienten, welche mit dem Rettungshubschrauber eingewiesen wurden im Vergleich zu den bodengebunden transportierten Patienten nachgewiesen werden („standardized mortality ratio“ 1,06 vs. 1,29). Faktoren, welche die Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit in der vorliegenden Untersuchung verbessern, sind kurze präklinische Rettungszeiten und der Transport mit dem Notarzt.

Abstract

The influence of the transport mode, i.e. Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) versus ground-based Emergency Medical Service (EMS) on the mortality of multiple trauma patients is still controversially discussed in the literature. In this study a total of 333 multiple trauma patients treated over a 1-year period in a level I trauma center in Switzerland were analyzed. Using the newly established revised injury severity classification (RISC) score there was a tendency towards a better outcome for patients transported by HEMS (standardized mortality ratio 1.06 for HEMS versus 1.29 for EMS). Overall a short preclinical time and the presence of an emergency physician (EP) were associated with a better outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Andruszkow H, Lefering R, Frink M et al (2013) Survival benefit of helicopter emergency medical services compared to ground emergency medical services in traumatized patients. Crit Care 17:R124

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baxt WG, Moody P (1983) The impact of a rotorcraft aeromedical emergency care service on trauma mortality. JAMA 249:3047–3051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxt WG, Moody P (1987) The impact of a physician as part of the aeromedical prehospital team in patients with blunt trauma. JAMA 257:3246–3250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biewener A, Aschenbrenner U, Rammelt S et al (2004) Impact of helicopter transport and hospital level on mortality of polytrauma patients. J Trauma 56:94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bochicchio GV, Ilahi O, Joshi M et al (2003) Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 54:307–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brugger H, Elsensohn F, Syme D et al (2005) A survey of emergency medical services in mountain areas of Europe and North America: official recommendations of the International Commission for Mountain Emergency Medicine (ICAR Medcom). High Alt Med Biol 6:226–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler DP, Anwar I, Willett K (2010) Is it the H or the EMS in HEMS that has an impact on trauma patient mortality? A systematic review of the evidence. Emerg Med J 27:692–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chappell VL, Mileski WJ, Wolf SE, Gore DC (2002) Impact of discontinuing a hospital-based air ambulance service on trauma patient outcomes. J Trauma 52:486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jongh MA de, Stel HF van, Schrijvers AJ et al (2012) The effect of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services on trauma patient mortality in the Netherlands. Injury 43:1362–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frink M, Probst C, Hildebrand F et al (2007) The influence of transportation mode on mortality in polytraumatized patients. An analysis based on the German Trauma Registry. Unfallchirurg 110:334–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galvagno SM Jr, Haut ER, Zafar SN et al (2012) Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma. JAMA 307:1602–1610

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannakopoulos GF, Kolodzinskyi MN, Christiaans HM et al (2013) Helicopter Emergency Medical Services save lives: outcome in a cohort of 1073 polytraumatized patients. Eur J Emerg Med 20:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussmann B, Lefering R, Waydhas C et al (2011) Prehospital intubation of the moderately injured patient: a cause of morbidity? A matched-pairs analysis of 1,200 patients from the DGU Trauma Registry. Crit Care 15:R207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lerner EB, Moscati RM (2001) The golden hour: scientific fact or medical „urban legend“? Acad Emerg Med 8:758–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McVey J, Petrie DA, Tallon JM (2010) Air versus ground transport of the major trauma patient: a natural experiment. Prehosp Emerg Care 14:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell AD, Tallon JM, Sealy B (2007) Air versus ground transport of major trauma patients to a tertiary trauma centre: a province-wide comparison using TRISS analysis. Can J Surg 50:129–133

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nathens AB, Brunet FP, Maier RV (2004) Development of trauma systems and effect on outcomes after injury. Lancet 363:1794–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newgard CD, Schmicker RH, Hedges JR et al (2010) Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the „golden hour“ in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med 55:235–246 e234

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicholl JP, Brazier JE, Snooks HA (1995) Effects of London helicopter emergency medical service on survival after trauma. BMJ 311:217–222

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osterwalder JJ (2003) Mortality of blunt polytrauma: a comparison between emergency physicians and emergency medical technicians – prospective cohort study at a level I hospital in eastern Switzerland. J Trauma 55:355–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roudsari BS, Nathens AB, Cameron P et al (2007) International comparison of prehospital trauma care systems. Injury 38:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ryynanen OP, Iirola T, Reitala J et al (2010) Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18:62

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schiller WR, Knox R, Zinnecker H et al (1988) Effect of helicopter transport of trauma victims on survival in an urban trauma center. J Trauma 28:1127–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sollid SJ, Rimstad R, Rehn M et al (2012) Oslo government district bombing and Utoya island shooting July 22, 2011: the immediate prehospital emergency medical service response. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart KE, Cowan LD, Thompson DM et al (2011) Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis. Acad Emerg Med 18:1208–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivent EE, Faul M, Wald MM (2011) Reduced mortality in injured adults transported by helicopter emergency medical services. Prehosp Emerg Care 15:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor C, Jan S, Curtis K et al (2012) The cost-effectiveness of physician staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) transport to a major trauma centre in NSW, Australia. Injury 43:1843–1849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas SH, Harrison TH, Buras WR et al (2002) Helicopter transport and blunt trauma mortality: a multicenter trial. J Trauma 52:136–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeguiayan JM, Garrigue D, Binquet C et al (2011) Medical pre-hospital management reduces mortality in severe blunt trauma: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care 15:R34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken Herrn Dr. Kaspar Rufibach und Frau Dr. Michaela Paul, Abteilung Biostatistik der Universität Zürich, für die Betreuung der statistischen Untersuchungen.

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. S. Günkel, M. König, R. Albrecht, M. Brüesch, R. Lefering, K. Sprengel, C.M.L. Werner, H.-P. Simmen, G.A. Wanner geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Alle angewandten Verfahren stehen im Einklang mit den ethischen Normen der verantwortlichen Kommission für Forschung am Menschen (institutionell und national) und mit der Deklaration von Helsinki von 1975 in der revidierten Fassung von 2008. Alle Patienten wurden erst nach erfolgter Aufklärung und Einwilligung in die Studie eingeschlossen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Günkel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Günkel, S., König, M., Albrecht, R. et al. Status quo der Boden- und Luftrettung schwerverletzter Patienten. Unfallchirurg 118, 233–239 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-014-2567-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-014-2567-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation