Skip to main content
Log in

Uses of the General Services Administration performance test method for upholstered furniture in the engineering of upholstered furniture frames

Anwendung des GSA-Leistungstests für die Konstruktion von Polstermöbeln

  • Originals
  • Published:
Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance tests may be defined as accelerated use tests that predict the ability of a product to fulfill its intended function. As indicators of performance, these tests are powerful analytical tools that can be used to eliminate many of the hazards and uncertainties associated with the development and production of furniture, as well as with its specification and buying. In order to develop universally accepted performance tests, test methods should be 1) independent of geographical range of application; 2) provide a maximum amount of engineering design information; 3) provide manufacturers with the information needed to market their product and consumers with the information needed to evaluate it; 4) provide a means for quantifying historical experience; and 5) provide a means for quantifying the strength of furniture in an unequivocal manner. This paper discusses the basic factors underlying the performance test concept, especially those factors that are necessary in order to achieve universally accepted performance tests.

Zusammenfassung

Leistungstests können als beschleunigte Prüfverfahren im Sinne der Benutzer angesehen werden, ob die Eignung eines Produktes für die angestrebten Zwecke gewährleistet ist. Als Leistungsindikatoren stellen diese Tests wertvolle analytische Hilfsmittel dar, um viele Risiken und Schwächen auszuschließen, die bei der Entwicklung und Herstellung von Möbeln sowie beim Klassifizieren und Vertrieb auftreten können. Um allgemein akzeptierte Prüfmethoden zu entwickeln, sollten diese Methoden 1) unabhängig von geographischen Gegebenheiten sein; 2) möglichst viel Information für die Konstruktion liefern; 3) Daten für die Hersteller liefern, um damit die benötigte Information für die Vermarktung und die Kunden bereitzustellen; 4) eine Möglichkeit zur Quantifizierung der überlieferten Erfahrungswerte an die Hand geben und 5) eindeutige Bewertungskriterien für die Festigkeit der Möbel ermöglichen. Dieser Artikel diskutiert die grundlegenden Faktoren, die zu einer allgemeinen Akzeptanz der Methode führen können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Library Association 1985: ANSI/ALA Z85.3. Proposed American National Standard for Bracket-Type Freestanding Metal Library Shelving. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute 1983: ANSI/BIFMA X5.4.-1983. American National Standard for Office Furnishings: Lounge Seating Tests. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute 1985: ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-1985. American National Standard Tests for General Office Chairs. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute 1989a: ANSI/BIFMA X5.2-1989. American National Standard Tests for Lateral Files. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute 1989b: ANSI/BIFMA X5.5-1989. American National Standard for Office Furnishings: Desk Product Tests. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American National Standards Institute 1985: ANSI/NKCA A151.1-1985. American National Standard. Recommended Performance and Construction Standards for Kitchen and Vanity Cabinets. New York

  • Anonymus 1984: The Value of a National Performance Test Method for Furniture to the Taiwanese Furniture Industry. Forest Prod. Ind. Magazine 3(2): 124–127, Taiwan

  • Anonymus 1989: Australian Furniture Makers Have no Standards! Professional Australasian Furnisher 1(6). Calufield, Vic., Australia

  • Brenner, C. F. 1973: The Challenge of Developing Performance Tests. ASTM Standardization News 9(1973)

  • British Standards Institution 1972: BS 4875: Part I: 1972. Specification for Strength and Stability of Domestic and Contract Furniture. Part. 1. Seating, Single and Multiple. London

  • Dillon, R. 1973: Performance Tests in Building Construction. ASTM Standardization News 9(1973)

  • Eckelman, C. A. 1978: Strength Design of Furniture. Tim Tech, Inc. W. Lafayette, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman C.A. 1979a: European Testing Centers. Furniture Design and Manufacturing 51 (3): 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman, C. A. 1979b: The Swedish Furniture Research Institute. Furniture Design and Manufacturing 51(4), 51(5), 51(6), 7 pp.

  • Eckelman, C.A.: Lee, M. 1981: Performance and Quality Assurance Testing. J. Interior Design Educ. Res. 7(1): 17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman, C.A. 1982: The Use of Performance Tests and Quality Assurance Programs in the Selection of Library Chairs. Monograph. American Library Association. Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman, C. A. 1988a: Performance Testing of Furniture. Part I: Underlying Concepts. Forest Prod. J. 38(3): 44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman C. A. 1988b: Performance Testing of Furniture. Part II: A Multi-Purpose Performance Test Method. Forest Prod. J. 38(4): 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. R. 1972: The Need for Informed Consumers. Material Research and Standards 8(1972): 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • General Services Administration 1981: FNAE-80-204. Upholstered Furniture Test Method. Furniture Commodity Center, Federal Supply Services. Washington. D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Services Administration 1989: FNEW-83-259E. Performance Test Method for Intensive Use Chairs. Furniture Commodity Center, Federal Supply Services. Wash. D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization 1982: ISO/TC 136/SC 2/WG. Furniture for Seating: Strength and Durability of Multiple Seating Units. Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. E. 1973: The Utility of Predictive Tests. ASTM Standardization News 8(1973)

  • Swedish Standards Association 1972: SIS 83 95 08. Easy Chairs and Sofas: Determination of Strength and Durability. Stockholm

  • Swedish Furniture Research Institute 1976: A1: 15. Sofas and Easy Chairs. Stockholm

  • Winning, K. 1981: Furniture: Handbook for Testing. 80 pp. Furniture Testing Institute. Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, J. 1976: Introduction to Structural Reliability. Lecture Notes. Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eckelman, C.A., Zhang, J. Uses of the General Services Administration performance test method for upholstered furniture in the engineering of upholstered furniture frames. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 53, 261–267 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050085

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050085

Keywords

Navigation