Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 367–379 | Cite as

Equivalent stiffness of timber used in CLT: closed-form estimates and numerical validation

  • Olivier Perret
  • Arthur LebéeEmail author
  • Cyril Douthe
  • Karam Sab
Original
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a closed-form approach is presented to estimate rapidly the equivalent stiffness of boards used in cross laminated timber (CLT) panels from local orthotropic behavior at ring scale for varying sawing patterns. It is first assumed that narrow edges are glued. In this case, closed-form Reuss and Voigt bounds are derived for the equivalent layer behavior of CLT. An application to Norway spruce boards is presented and reveals that the cross-layer (rolling) shear behavior lies between 100 and 150  MPa with a careful selection of the board sawing pattern. Then, using finite element method, upper bounds for the cross-layer shear stiffness modulus of boards with and without glued edges are calculated and theoretical predictions are compared with recommendations and experimental data from the literature. Finally, it appears that these bounds remain relevant for CLT layer with unglued narrow edges for common aspect ratios.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aicher S, Dill-Langer S (2000) Basic considerations to rolling shear modulus in wooden boards. Tech Rep Otto Graf J 11:157Google Scholar
  2. Aicher S, Dill-Langer G, Höfflin L (2001) Effect of polar anisotropy of wood loaded perpendicular to grain. J Mater Civ Eng 13(1):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aicher S, Christian Z, Hirsch M (2016) Rolling shear modulus and strength of beech wood laminations. Holzforschung 70(8):773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogensperger T, Moosbrugger T, Silly G (2010) Verification of CLT-plates under loads in plane. In: 11th World conference on timber engineering 2010, WCTE, vol 1, pp 231–240Google Scholar
  5. Ehrhart T, Brandner R (2018) Rolling shear: test configurations and properties of some European soft- and hardwood species. Eng Struct 172(tba):554–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrhart T, Brandner R, Schickhofer G, Frangi A (2015) Rolling shear properties of some European timber species with focus on cross laminated timber (CLT): test configuration and parameter study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international network on timber engineering research meeting, vol 48, pp 61–78Google Scholar
  7. Eurocode 5-1-1 (2004) EN 1995 1-1: design of timber structures. Part 1-1: General—common rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, CEN, Bruxelles, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  8. Eurocode 5-1-1 (2015) Working draft of design of CLT in a revised Eurocode 5-1-1. Version 2015-10-30 (confidential). European Committee for Standardization, CEN, Bruxelles, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. Franzoni L, Lebée A, Lyon F, Forêt G (2016a) Bending behavior of regularly spaced CLT panels. In: WCTE 2016—World conference on timber engineeringGoogle Scholar
  10. Franzoni L, Lebée A, Lyon F, Foret G (2016b) Influence of orientation and number of layers on the elastic response and failure modes on CLT floors: modeling and parameter studies. Eur J Wood Prod 74(5):671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franzoni L, Lebée A, Lyon F, Forêt G (2017) Elastic behavior of cross laminated timber and timber panels with regular gaps: thick-plate modeling and experimental validation. Eng Struct 141:402–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franzoni L, Lebée A, Lyon F, Forêt G (2018) Closed-form solutions for predicting the thick elastic plate behavior of CLT and timber panels with gaps. Eng Struct 164:290–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagnon S, Pirvu C (2013) CLT handbook: cross laminated timber. FPInnovations, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustafsson PJ, Danielsson H (2013) Perpendicular to grain stiffness of timber cross sections as affected by growth ring pattern, size and shape. Eur J Wood Prod 71(1):111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hashin Z (1986) Analysis of stiffness reduction of cracked cross-ply laminates. Eng Fract Mech 25(5–6):771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hashin Z (1987) Analysis of orthogonally cracked laminates under tension. J Appl Mech 54(4):872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jakobs A (2005) Zur Berechnung von Brettlagenholz mit starrem und nachgiebigem Verbund unter plattenartiger Belastung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Rollschubes und der Drillweichheit (On the calculation of cross laminated timber as a composite plate with special consideration of the rolling-shear and the in-plane shear stiffness). (In German). Ph.D. thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr MünchenGoogle Scholar
  18. Keunecke D, Sonderegger W, Pereteanu K, Lüthi T, Niemz P (2007) Determination of Young’s and shear moduli of common yew and Norway spruce by means of ultrasonic waves. Wood Sci Technol 41(4):309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keunecke D, Hering S, Niemz P (2008) Three-dimensional elastic behaviour of common yew and Norway spruce. Wood Sci Technol 42(8):633–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreuzinger H (1999) Plate and shell structures. A model for common calculation tools (in German). Bauen mit Holz 1:34–39Google Scholar
  21. Lebée A, Sab K (2012a) Homogenization of cellular sandwich panels. C R Mécanique 340(4–5):320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lebée A, Sab K (2012b) Homogenization of thick periodic plates: application of the bending-gradient plate theory to a folded core sandwich panel. Int J Solids Struct 49(19–20):2778–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lomholt I (2009) Stadthaus London: Murray Grove building. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:706-1363. Accessed 11 June 2018
  24. Mairs J (2016) Anders Berensson proposes wooden skyscraper with decorative facade for Stockholm. https://www.dezeen.com/2016/04/25/anders-berensson-architects-tratoppen-wooden-skyscraper-concept-stockholm-cross-laminated-timber/. Accessed 11 June 2018
  25. Moosbrugger T, Guggenberger W, Bogensperger T (2006) Cross laminated timber wall segments under homogeneous shear with and without openings. In: WCTE 2006, 9th World conference on timber engineering, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  26. Nairn JA (2007) A numerical study of the transverse modulus of wood as a function of grain orientation and properties. Holzforschung 61(4):406–413Google Scholar
  27. Nairn JA (2017) Cross laminated timber properties including effects of non-glued edges and additional cracks. Eur J Wood Prod 75(6):973–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perret O, Lebée A, Douthe C, Sab K (2016) The bending-gradient theory for the linear buckling of thick plates: application to cross laminated timber panels. Int J Solids Struct 87:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perret O, Lebée A, Douthe C, Sab K (2018) Experimental determination of the equivalent-layer shear stiffness of CLT through four-point bending of sandwich beams. Constr Build Mater 186:1132–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sab K, Lebée A (2015) Homogenization of thick and heterogeneous plates. Wiley-ISTE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schickhofer G, Brandner R, Bauer H (2016) Introduction to CLT, product properties, strength classes. In: cross laminated timber—a competitive wood product for visionary and fire safe buildings: joint conference of COST actions FP1402 and FP1404Google Scholar
  32. Silly G (2010) Numerical study on in-plane shear and torsional stiffness of cross laminated timber (in German). Diplomarbeit, Graz University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  33. Thiel A, Krenn H (2016) Buckling loads for cross-laminated timber elements under uniaxial in-plane compression. In: Proceedings of the 14th World conference on timber engineering, Vienna (AUT)Google Scholar
  34. Thiel A, Schickhofer G (2010) CLTdesigner—a software tool for designing cross laminated timber elements: 1D-plate-design. In: World conference on timber engineeringGoogle Scholar
  35. Thiel A, Schickhofer G (2013) ULS and SLS design of CLT and its implementation in the CLT designer. In: Schickhofer G, Harris R, Ringhofer A (eds) Focus solid timber solution—European conference on cross laminated timber (CLT)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Navier UMR 8205École des Ponts ParisTech, IFSTTAR, CNRS, Université Paris-EstMarne-la-ValléeFrance

Personalised recommendations