European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 1663–1668 | Cite as

Physical properties of native and thermally treated European woods as potential alternative to Indian rosewood for the use in classical guitars

  • Robert KrügerEmail author
  • Mario Zauer
  • André Wagenführ


Untreated and thermally modified woods of cherry, service tree, pear and plum were investigated as potential substitutions for Indian rosewood in guitar making. Acoustic properties such as dynamic modulus of elasticity, dynamic shear modulus in LR-plane and loss coefficient as an indicator for damping were determined by means of experimental modal analysis and the mechanical properties by means of static bending and hardness test. The swelling behavior was also investigated. The results suggest that cherry and service tree could be used as alternative back and side material and plum and service tree may also be used for fingerboards. Thermal modifications at 160 °C for 8 h improve swelling behavior, mechanical properties, but damping was slightly increased for cherry and pear. No significant change of Brinell hardness was observed owing to thermal modification.



The research project was financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology of Germany (Grant reference 16KN035325).


  1. Bennett BC (2016) The sound of trees: wood selection in guitars and other chordophones. Econ Bot 70:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biziks V, Andersons B, Beļkova Ļ, Kapača E, Militz H (2013) Changes in the microstructure of birch wood after hydrothermal treatment. Wood Sci Technol 47:717–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brémaud I, El Kaïm Y, Guibal D, Minato K, Thibaut B, Gril J (2012) Characterisation and categorisation of the diversity in viscoelastic vibrational properties between 98 wood types. Ann For Sci 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DIN 52184 (1979) Testing of wood; determination of swelling and shrinkage. German Institute for Standardization (in German) Google Scholar
  5. DIN 52186 (1978) Testing of wood; bending test. German Institute for Standardization (in German) Google Scholar
  6. EN 13183-1 (2002) Moisture content of a piece of sawn timber—part 1: determination by oven dry method; German version. German Institute for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  7. EN 1534 (2011) Wood flooring—determination of resistance to indentation—test method; German version. German Institute for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  8. Endo K, Obataya E, Zeniya N, Matsuo M (2016) Effects of heating humidity on the physical properties of hydrothermally treated spruce wood. Wood Sci Technol 50:1161–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. French RM (2008) Engineering the guitar: theory and practice. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Gore T, Gilet G (2016) Contemporary acoustic guitar design and build. Gore, Terrey HillsGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunduz G, Aydemir D, Karakas G (2009) The effects of thermal treatment on the mechanical properties of wild Pear (Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pall.) wood and changes in physical properties. J Mat Des 30:4391–4395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haines DW (2000) The essential mechanical properties of wood prepared for musical instruments. Cat Acoust Soc J 4:20–32Google Scholar
  13. Haines DW, Leban J, Herbé C (1996) Determination of Young’s modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic methods. Wood Sci Technol 30:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hearmon RFS (1958) The influence of shear and rotary inertia on the free flexural vibration of wooden beams. Br J Appl Phys 9:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kocaefe D, Chaudhry B, Poncsak S, Bouazara M, Pichette A (2007) Thermogravimetric study of high temperature treatment of aspen: effect of treatment parameters on weight loss and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 42:854–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kubojima Y, Okano T, Ohta M (2000) Vibrational properties of Sitka spruce heat-treated in nitrogen gas. J Wood Sci 46:63-:67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohebby B, Yaghoubi K, Roohnia M (2007) Acoustical properties of hydrothermally modified mulberry (Morus alba L.) wood. In: Proceedings of the third European conference on wood modification, Cardiff, pp 283–286Google Scholar
  18. Obataya E (2017) Effects of natural and artificial ageing on the physical and acoustic properties of wood in musical instruments. J Cult Heritage 27:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ono T (1999) Transient response of wood for musical instruments and its mechanism in vibrational property. J Acoust Soc Jpn (E) 20:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roffael E, Kraft R (2012) Influence of thermal wood modification on the water retention value (WRV). Eur J Wood Prod 70:393–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sproßmann R, Zauer M, Wagenführ A (2017) Characterization of acoustic and mechanical properties of common tropical woods used in classical guitars. J RINP 7:1737–1742Google Scholar
  22. Wagenführ A, Pfriem A, Grothe T, Eichelberger K (2006) Investigations on the characterization of thermally modified spruce for soundboards of guitars. Holz Roh Werkst 64:313–316 (in German) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wegst UG (2006) Wood for sound. Am J Bot 93:1439–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yano H, Furuta Y, Nakagawa H (1997) Materials for guitar back plates made from sustainable forest resources. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1112–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zauer M, Kowaleswki A, Sproßmann R, Stonjek H, Wagenführ A (2016) Thermal modification of European beech at relatively mild temperatures for the use in electric bass guitars. Eur J Wood Prod 74:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Krüger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mario Zauer
    • 1
  • André Wagenführ
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Natural Materials TechnologyTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations