Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 1335–1346 | Cite as

Peeling of small diameter rubber log using spindleless lathe technology: evaluation of veneer properties from outer to inner radial section of log at different veneer thicknesses

  • Pui San Khoo
  • Paik San H’ng
  • Kit Ling Chin
  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
  • Mariusz Maminski
  • Raja-Nazrin Raja-Ahmad
  • Chuan Li Lee
  • Siti Nurul Ashikin
  • Mohd-Hizami Saharudin
Original

Abstract

Rubber forest plantation (RFP) in Malaysia was currently governed by small holders who provided lower diameter logs as they managed plantation using higher planting density, higher frequency tapping practice and young-tapping systems to enhance latex harvesting yield and fulfil demand for rubber timber. Nevertheless, these new planting systems will affect the growth of rubber tree and result in the production of smaller diameter (< 20 cm) rubber logs compared to conventional planting systems. Hence, this raises the question of the small diameter log with respect to its impact on veneer quality. The aim of this study is to determine the properties of rubberwood veneers manufactured from outer to inner radial section of log at different veneer thicknesses. The rubber logs with diameter less than 20 cm were peeled up to 3 cm of peeler core to produce 1, 2 and 3 mm veneer thickness using spindleless lathe. Veneer properties such as thickness variation, lathe checks, surface roughness and contact angle were evaluated from outer to the inner radial section of log at three different veneer thicknesses. Results showed that rubber trees are suitable for peeling due to its consistent density ranging from 650 to 706 kg/m3. Better visual grades recovery can be obtained when peeling thinner rubberwood veneers. The thickness variation, lathe check depth, length and surface roughness of rubberwood veneers increased with increasing veneer thickness, whereas lathe check frequency decreased with increasing veneer thickness. In general, veneer thickness has more prominent effects on the properties of rubberwood veneer compared to the effect of log radial section.

References

  1. Aydin I, Colakoglu G, Hiziroglu S (2006) Surface characteristics of spruce veneers and shear strength of plywood as a function of log temperature in peeling process. Int J Solids Struct 43:6140–6147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailleres H, Denaud L, Butaud JC, McGavin RL (2015) Experimental investigation on rotary peeling parameters of high density coconut wood. BioResources 10(3):4978–4996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daoui A, Descamps C, Marchal R, Zerizer A (2011) Influence of veneer quality on beech LVL mechanical properties. Maderas Ciencia y tecnología 13(1):69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darmawan W, Nandika D, Massijaya Y, Kabe A, Rahayu I, Denaud L, Ozarska B (2015) Lathe check characteristics of fast growing sengon veneers and their effect on LVL glue-bond and bending strength. J Mater Process Technol 215(1):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denaud LE, Bleron L, Ratle A, Marchal R (2007) Online control of wood peeling process: acoustical and vibratory measurements of lathe checks frequency. Ann For Sci 64(5):569–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dundar T, Akbulut T, Korkut S (2008) The effects of some manufacturing factors on surface roughness of sliced (Tieghemella heckelii Pierre Ex A. Chev.) and rotary-cut beech Makore (Fagus orientalis L.) veneers. Build Environ 43(4):469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dupleix A, Denaud LE, Bleron L, Marchal R, Hughes M (2013) The effect of log heating temperature on the peeling process and veneer quality: beech, birch, and spruce case studies. Eur J Wood Prod 71:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haifah S (2002) Anatomical and fiber properties of hybrid Acacia grown in Sabah. Dissertation, Universiti Putra MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Lim SC, Gan KS, Choo KT (2003) The characteristics, properties and uses of plantation timbers—rubberwood and acacia mangium. Timber Technology BulletinGoogle Scholar
  10. Luo J, Arnold R, Ren S, Jiang Y, Lu W, Peng Y, Xie Y (2013) Veneer grades, recoveries, and values from 5-year-old eucalypt clones. Ann For Sci 70(4):417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lutz JF (1974) Techniques for peeling, slicing, and drying veneer. Forest products lab Madison wis No:FSRP-FPL-228Google Scholar
  12. Lutz JF (1978) wood veneer: log selection, cutting, and drying. Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  13. Malaysian Rubber Board (2015) Malaysia’s Planted Hectarage by Sector. Department of Statistics Malaysia. http://www.lgm.gov.my/nrstat/nrstats.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2017
  14. Marchal R, Mothe F, Denaud L, Thibaut B, Bleron L (2009) Cutting forces in wood machining—basics and applications in industrial processes. Holzforschung 63:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGavin RL, Bailleres H, Lane F, Blackburn D, Vega M, Ozarska B (2014) Veneer recovery analysis of plantation eucalypt species using spindleless lathe technology. BioResources 9(1):613–627Google Scholar
  16. McMillin CW (1958) The relation of mechanical properties of wood and nosebar pressure in the production of veneer. J For Prod 8(1):23–32Google Scholar
  17. Melo RR, Del Menezzi CHS, Pavan BE, Rodolfo Júnior F (2014) Rotary peeling yield of Schizolobium amazonicum (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). Acta Amazonica 44(3):315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Naji HR, Sahri MH, Nobuchi T, Bakar ES (2011) The effect of growth rate on wood density and anatomical characteristics of Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) in two different clonal trails. J Nat Prod Plant Resour 1(2):71–80Google Scholar
  19. Naji HR, Bakar ES, Sahri MH, Soltani M, Hamid HA, Ebadi SE (2014) Variation in mechanical properties of two rubberwood clones in relation to planting density. J Trop For Sci 26(4):503–512Google Scholar
  20. Pałubicki B, Marchal Ŕ, Butaud JC, Denaud LE, Bléron L, Collet R, Reeb JE (2010) A method of lathe checks measurement; SMOF device and its software. Eur J Wood Prod 68(2):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pot G, Denaud LE, Collet R (2015) Numerical study of the influence of veneer lathe checks on the elastic mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber (LVL) made of beech. Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood 69(3):337–345Google Scholar
  22. Ratnasingam J, Ramasamy G, Ioras F, Kaner J, Lu WM (2012) Production potential of rubberwood in malaysia: its economic challenges. J Not Bot Horti Agrobo 40(2):317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saffian HA, Tahir PM, Harun J, Jawaid M, Hakeem KR (2014) Influence of planting density on the fiber morphology and chemical composition of a new latex-timber clone tree of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). BioResources 9(2):2593–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sainoi T, Sdoodee S (2012) The impact of ethylene gas application on young tapping rubber trees. J Agric Technol 8(4):1497–1507Google Scholar
  25. Shigematsu A, Mizoue N, Ide K, Khun K, Pheng M, Yoshida S, Kohroki K, Sato N (2011) Estimation of rubberwood production in Cambodia. New For 42(2):149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shuib NH (2015) Study on different tapping period in rubber forest plantation. In: Proceeding of the Kuala Lumpur International Agriculture, Forestry and Plantation Conference, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Spelter H (1991) Recent developments in veneer peeling confront quality variables. Panel World (5):54–65Google Scholar
  28. Teoh YP, Don MM, Ujang S (2011) Assessment of the properties, utilization, and preservation of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis): a case study in Malaysia. J Wood Sci 57(4):255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thibaut B, Beauchêne J (2004) Links between wood machining phenomena and wood mechanical properties: the case of 0°/90° orthogonal cutting of green wood. Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Symposium on Wood Machining, Vienna, pp 149–160Google Scholar
  30. Thibaut B, Denaud L, Collet R, Marchal R, Beauchêne J, Mothe F, Méausoone P-J, Martin P, Larricq P, Eyma F (2016) Wood machining with a focus on French research in the last 50 years. Ann For Sci 73(1):163–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vázquez G, González-Álvarez J, López-Suevos F, Antorrena G (2003) Effect of veneer side wettability on bonding quality of Eucalyptus globulus plywoods prepared using a tannin-phenol-formaldehyde adhesive. BioResource 87(3):349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vick CB (1999) Adhesive bonding of wood materials. In: Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. General technical report FPL; GTR-113, pp. 9.1–9.24  Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pui San Khoo
    • 1
  • Paik San H’ng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kit Ling Chin
    • 1
  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
    • 2
  • Mariusz Maminski
    • 3
  • Raja-Nazrin Raja-Ahmad
    • 1
  • Chuan Li Lee
    • 1
  • Siti Nurul Ashikin
    • 2
  • Mohd-Hizami Saharudin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest ProductsUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of ForestryUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Faculty of Wood TechnologyWarsaw University of Life Sciences, SGGWWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations