Advertisement

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products

, Volume 74, Issue 1, pp 83–89 | Cite as

Mechanical properties of Papua New Guinea balsa wood

  • Nathan J. KotlarewskiEmail author
  • Benoit Belleville
  • Benson K. Gusamo
  • Barbara Ozarska
Original

Abstract

The mechanical properties of plantation-grown balsa wood from Papua New Guinea (PNG) were determined according to American Society for Testing and Materials D143-09. Static bending, hardness, compression parallel and perpendicular to grain, and shear parallel to grain tests were performed on kiln-dried specimens segregated into the three international density classes (80 ≤ 120, 120 ≤ 180 and 180 ≤ 220 kg/m3). The literature states balsa with a density between 120 and 180 kg/m3 has the most commercial value in contemporary markets. The results presented in this study indicate that balsa with a density around 150 kg/m3 can have superior strength properties to balsa with a higher and lower density (this was most evident in the compression perpendicular and shear tests). Specimen moisture content and air dry density were calculated to identify elements which may affect the strength properties of balsa. Generally, the greater the density of a specimen, the greater the strength. However, unusual patterns were noted in this study where density had little impact on the increase in strength (particularly in the hardness and shear tests). Average strength results for the medium density class of PNG-grown balsa were: modulus of elasticity 2037 MPa, modulus of rupture 16.6 MPa, hardness tangential surface 307 N, hardness radial surface 291 N, hardness axial surface 426 N, compression parallel 9.2 MPa, compression perpendicular 1.1 MPa and shear 1.9 MPa.

Keywords

Timber Moisture Content Density Class Maximum Compressive Stress Average Moisture Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Kulala Mulung, Emily Flowers, Peter Kanowski and Braden Jenkin for organising Benson Gusamo’s trip and travel expenses to the University of Melbourne, Australia as a part of the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) balsa Project FST/2009/016. We are grateful to Allen Brittain for assistance in preparing balsa shear specimens at Swinburne University of Technology. Thanks to the balsa processors: The PNG Balsa Company Ltd and Coconut Products Limited in PNG for supplying the balsa for testing.

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (2009) Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. D143. ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bootle K (1983) Wood in Australia. Types, properties and uses. McGraw-Hill Book Company, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrillo A, Garza M, Nañez M, Garza F, Foroughbakhch R, Sandoval S (2011) Physical and mechanical wood properties of 14 timber species from Northeast Mexico. Ann For Sci 68(4):675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury M, Sarker S, Deb J, Sonet S (2013) Timber species grouping in Bangladesh: linking wood properties. Wood Sci Technol 47(4):797–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eddowes P (1977) Commercial timbers of Papua New Guinea; their properties and uses. Forest Industries Council of Papua New Guinea, Port MoresbyGoogle Scholar
  6. Eddowes P (2005) Solomon islands timber. Solomon Islands Forestry Management Project (SIFMP II). AusAID, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis J (1991) Ochroma pyramidale Cav. Balsa. Species Monograpg SO-ITF-SM-41. Institute of Tropical Forestry. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodrich T, Nawaz N, Feih S, Lattimer B, Mouritz A (2010) High-temperature mechanical properties and thermal recovery of balsa wood. J Wood Sci 56(6):437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kretschmann D (2010) Mechanical properties of wood. In: Ross R (ed) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  10. Midgley S, Blyth M, Howcroft N, Midgley D, Brown A (2010) Balsa: biology, production and economics in Papua New Guinea (report 73). ACIAR, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Osei-Antwi M, de Castro J, Vassilopoulos A, Keller T (2013) Shear mechanical characterization of balsa wood as core material of composite sandwich panels. Constr Build Mater 41:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shishkina O, Lomov S, Verpoest I, Gorbatikh L (2014) Structure–property relations for balsa wood as a function of density: modelling approach. Arch Appl Mech 84(6):789–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Standards Australia (2000) Timber—methods of test—density. 1080.3. AS/NZS, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Standards Australia (2012) Timber—methods of test—moisture content. 1080.1. AS/NZS, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsoumis G (1991) Science and technology of wood structure, properties, utilization. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Valle Tager G, Hartig J, Cabrero J, Haller P (2014) Selected mechanical properties of four Central American wood species. Eur J Wood Prod 72(5):699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiselius S (1998) Ochroma Sw. In: Sosef M, Hong L, Prawirohatmodjo S (eds) Plant resources of South-East Asia No 5(3). Timber trees: lesser-known timbers. Backhuys Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan J. Kotlarewski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Benoit Belleville
    • 2
  • Benson K. Gusamo
    • 3
  • Barbara Ozarska
    • 2
  1. 1.Swinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Bulolo University CollegeBuloloPapua New Guinea

Personalised recommendations