Abstract
This study demonstrates life cycle assessment (LCA) on a reference wooden building according to the latest normative standards: EN 15978, EN 15804 and EN 16485. Global warming potential and primary energy balance over the reference building were assessed in a case study. Through the assessment, the application of the standards was studied. In addition, possible points for development in the standards, especially concerning wood products and wood construction, were discussed from a practical perspective. The lack of proper data is a critical issue in conducting the assessment in compliance with the standards. Since LCA is a data-intensive method, the preparation of data for the building assessment according to the standard is certainly required. This paper also raises questions about the life cycle modules defined in the standards and the importance of the communication system used for the assessment results. It would be of importance to develop the communication system in such a way as to stimulate environmental consciousness in society. In order to develop a relevant communication system, further discussion and case studies would be important and feedback from such practices should be incorporated into the development of the guideline for the assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allacker K, Pant R, Schau EM (2013) The need for a comprehensive and consistent approach in sustainability assessment of buildings—the EC product environmental footprint. In: Proceedings of the Sustainable Buildings—Construction products & Technologies (SB13 Graz), pp 982–990
Björklund T, Tillman AM (1997) LCA of building frame structures: environmental impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames. Technical Environmental Planning Report. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, p 2
BMUB (2002) Federal Ministry for the Environmental, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety. Ordinance on the Management of Waste Wood. http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/bmu-import/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/wastewood_ordinance.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2013
DIN V 4108-6 (2003) Wärmeschutz und Energie-Einsparung in Gebäuden—Teil 6: Berechnung des Jahresheizwärme- und des Jahresheizenergiebedarfs (In German) (Thermal protection and energy economy in buildings—Part 6: Calculation of annual heat and energy use), Beuth, Berlin
Dodoo A, Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2009) Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(5):276–286
EC-JRC-IES (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. European Commission—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability First Edition. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Ecoinvent Centre (2013) Ecoinvent database version 3.01 http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/ecoinvent-version-3/ecoinvent-v30/. Accessed 6 May 2014
EN 15804 (2012+A1:2013) Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products. European Committee for Standardization
EN 15978 (2011) Sustainability of construction works—assessment of environmental performance of buildings—calculation method. European Committee for Standardization
EN 16485 (2014) Round and sawn timber—environmental product declarations—product category rules for wood and wood-based products for use in construction. European Committee for Standardization
Erlandsson M, Borg M (2003) Generic LCA-methodology applicable for buildings, constructions and operation services—today practice and development needs. Build Environ 38(7):919–938
European Commission (EC) (2007) 2020 Vision: saving our energy. http://www.energy.eu/publications/2007_eeap_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2013
European Commission (EC) (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste and repealing certain Directives. Off J Eur Union L 312
Fava JA (2006) Will the next 10 years be as productive in advancing life cycle approaches as the last 15 years? Int J LCA 11(1):6–8
Fay R, Graham T, Usha IR (2000) Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study. Build Res Inf 28(1):31–41
Fischer C, Werge M (2011) EU as a Recycling Society—Present recycling levels of Municipal Waste and Construction & Demolition Waste in the EU. European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production & European Environment Agency. ETC/SCP working paper 2/2009. http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/publications/wp2009_2/wp/WP2009_2. Accessed 25 June 2013
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Margni M, Nemecek T, Spielmann M (2007a) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods—Data v2.0 (2007). Ecoinvent report No. 3, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/03_LCIA-Implementation.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2013
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M, Wernet G (2007b) Overview and methodology—Data v2.0 (2007). Ecoinvent report No. 1, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/01_OverviewAndMethodology.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2013
Hafner A, Winter S, Takano A (2012) Wooden products as building material in life cycle analysis. In: Proceedings of the third International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering (IALCCE 2012), Taylor & Francis Group, pp 1530–1537
Höglmeier K, Weber-Blaschke G, Richter K (2013) Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction—a case study for south-east Germany. Resour Conserv Recy 78:81–91
Holm L, Schaufelberger JE, Grinffin D, Cole T (2005) Construction cost estimating: process and practice. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey
IBU—Institut Bauen und Umwelt (2013) Environmental Product Declarations. http://construction-environment.com. Accessed 23 Dec 2013
Lippke B, Wilson J, Meil J, Taylor A (2010) Characterizing the importance of carbon storage in wood products. Wood Fibre Sci 42:5–14
Moncaster AM, Symons KE (2013) A method and tool for ´cradle to grave` embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350. Energ Build 66:514–523
Nord T (2008) Prefabrication strategies in the timber housing industry—case studies from Swedish and Austrian markets. Technical Report, Luleå University of Technology. http://epubl.ltu.se/1402-1536/2008/16/LTU-TR-0816-SE.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2014
Ortiz S, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39
Pajchrowski G, Noskowiak A, Lewandowska A, Strykowski W (2014) Wood as a building material in the light of environmental assessment of full life cycle of four buildings. Constr Build Mater 52:428–436
Passer A, Kreiner H, Maydl P (2012) Assessment of the environmental performance of buildings: a critical evaluation of the influence of technical building equipment on residential buildings. Int J LCA 17(9):1116–1130
Pawelzik P, Carus M, Hotchkiss J, Narayan R, Selke S, Wellisch M, Weiss M, Wicke M, Patel MK (2013) Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) if bio-based materials—reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl 73:211–228
Peeredoom EC, Rene K, Saul L, Sven L (1999) Influence of inventory data sets on lice-cycle assessment results: a case study on PVC. J Ind Ecol 2:109–147
Peurifoy R, Oberlender G (2002) Estimating construction costs, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston
Popescu CM, Phaobunjong K, Ovararin N (2005) Estimating building costs. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York
Rüter S, Diederichs S (2012) Ökobilanz-Basisdaten für Bauprodukte aus Holz (In German) (Life cycle assessment datasets for wood-based building product). Universität Hamburg, Thünen-Institute of Wood Research, Report No: 2012/01. http://literatur.vti.bund.de/digbib_extern/dn050490.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2013
Scheuer C, Keoleian GA, Reppe P (2003) Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: model challenges and design implications. Energ Build 35(10):1049–1064
SFS 5139 (2011) Rakennuksen Pinta-alat (In Finnish) (Building areas). Finnish standards association
Takano A, Winter S, Hughes M, Linkosalmi L (2014) Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build Environ 79:20–30
The German Heat and Power Association (2006) AGFW- Branchenreport 2006 (in German) (AGFW- Field report 2006), https://www.agfw.de/wir-ueber-uns/leistungs-bilanzen/branchenreport-2006/. Accessed 31 Mar 2014
Thormark C (2006) The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Build Environ 41(8):1019–1026
Venkatarama Reddy BV, Jagadish KS (2003) Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energ Build 35(2):129–137
Verbeeck G, Hens H (2007) Life cycle optimization of extremely low energy dwellings. J Build Phys 31(2):143–177
Werner F, Richter K (2007) Wooden building products in comparative LCA. Int J LCA 12(7):470–479
Wittstock B et al. (2012) EeBGuide Guidance Document, part A: products and part B: Buildings. Operational guidance or life cycle assessment studies of the Energy-Efficient Buildings Initiative. Project report. http://www.eebguide.eu. Accessed 20 Dec 2013
Wittstock B, Fischer M, Böttge J, Gantner J, Ockel E, Braune A (2013) Trends in Building & Construction Life Cycle Assessment. In: Proceedings of the Sustainable Buildings—Construction products & Technologies (SB13 Graz), pp 1004–1011
Wood for Good (2013) Lifecycle analysis datasets. http://www.woodforgood.com/sustainability/lifecycle-database/lca-datasets. Accessed 7 Sept 2014
Ympäristöministeriö (Finnish ministry of the Environment) (2008) Pientalon Huoltokirja (In Finnish) (Single family house service book). http://www.neuvoo.fi/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=vEPqO6/HHDc=. Accessed 7 Jul 2013
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from WoodWisdom-Net, Finnish Wood Research Oy, The KONE foundation and The Finnish Cultural Foundation, as well the Huber & Sohn GmbH for all the support for the research data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takano, A., Hafner, A., Linkosalmi, L. et al. Life cycle assessment of wood construction according to the normative standards. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 73, 299–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0890-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-015-0890-4