Abstract
The volume recovery, product quality and process economics of Rubberwood sawmilling using the conventional live sawing process and the saw dry and rip (SDR) process is described. The results showed that the SDR process, together with high temperature drying resulted in higher volume recovery and product quality compared to the conventional live sawing process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diawanich P, Matan N, Kyokong B (2010) Evolution of internal stress during drying, cooling and conditioning of Rubberwood lumber. Eur J Wood Prod 68:1–12
Layton TF, Smith WR, Maeglin RR (1986) An evaluation of the saw, dry and rip process to convert Red Alder into studs. Wood Sci Technol 20:185–200
Lim SC, Mohd Nadzri Y (1995) Tension wood in the stems and branches of Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis). J Trop For Prod 1(2):222–225
Maeglin RR, Boone RS (1983) Manufacture of quality yellow poplar studs using the saw-dry-rip (SDR) concept. For Prod J 33:10–18
Ratnasingam J, Scholz F (2007) Characterizing surface defects in machine planing of Rubberwood. Holz Roh- Werkst 65:325–327
Ratnasingam J, Scholz F (2009) Rubberwood—an industrial perspective. WRI Publications, Lodon
Ratnasingam J, Grohmann R, Scholz F (2010) Drying quality of Rubberwood: an industrial perspective. Eur J Wood Prod 68:115–116
Sik HS, Choo KT, Sarani Z, How SS, Mohamed Omar MK (2009) Influence of drying temperature on the physical and mechanical properties of Rubberwood. J Trop For Sci 21(3):181–189
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratnasingam, J., Scholz, F. Yield improvement in Rubberwood sawmilling through the saw, dry and rip (SDR) technique. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 70, 525–526 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-011-0556-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-011-0556-9