Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 245–246 | Cite as

Decay resistance in ground stake test of acetylated OSB

  • Antonios N. PapadopoulosEmail author


Stake Acetic Anhydride Ground Contact Creosote Decay Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Acetylated OSB stakes were tested in ground contact in Western Greece. Two levels of acetylation were used, a high level of 20.4% acetyl content and a low level of 11.2%. The stakes were conditioned, measured and placed in soil for three years. Half of the stakes were below the ground line. After three years of testing, the results showed that acetylation imparts excellent protection against decay.


  1. 1.
    Kakaras AJ, Papadopoulos AN, Hale MD (2002) Observation on the performance of CCB and creosote treated fence posts after 18 years of exposure in Greece. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Cardiff, Wales, U.K. (Document No. IRG/WP 02-30288)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papadopoulos AN, Hill CAS (2002) The biological effectiveness of wood modified with linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides against Coniophora puteana. Holz Roh- Werkst 60(5):329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papadopoulos AN, Hale MD, Hill CAS (2002) Efficacy of linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides as wood protection chemicals. International Research Group on Wood Preservation. Cardiff, Wales, U.K. (Document No. IRG/WP 02-30295)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papadopoulos AN, Traboulay E (2002) Dimensional stability of OSB made from acetylated fir strands. Holz Roh- Werkst 60(2):84–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowell RM, Dawson BS, Hadi YS, Nicholas DD, Nilsson T, Placket DV, Simonson R, Westin M (1997) Worldwide in-ground stake test of acetylated composite boards. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Whistler, Canada (Document No. IRG/WP 97-40088)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowell RM (1975) Chemical modification of wood: Advantages and disadvantages. Proc Am Wood Assoc 71:41–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Branch of Drama, Department of Forestry and Management of Natural EnvironmentTechnological Educational Institute of KavalaDramaGreece

Personalised recommendations