Skip to main content
Log in

Lumber attributes, characteristics, and species preferences as indicated by secondary wood products firms in the continental United States

Von US-amerikanischen Holz verarbeitenden Betrieben bevorzugte Holzeigenschaften und Holzarten

  • ORIGINALARBEITEN ORIGINALS
  • Published:
Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to evaluate selected lumber attributes, species preferences, and lumber use properties among secondary wood manufacturers in the United States. Our sample included producers of kitchencabinets, furniture, doors, windows, and molded products who attended regional and national wood manufacturing events. More than 51% of respondents had annual sales of less than $500000, and the median company size was five employees. Results are presented for 17 selected lumber attributes, and indicate that appearance-related attributes were generally the most important, and that use of certified lumber was generally the least important. Price-related attributes (including low price and price stability) were generally intermediate in importance. There were statistically significant differences among geographic regions for four of the attributes, and among business types for three of the attributes. The most popular species for use by secondary manufacturers included the oaks, maple, and cherry, and there were strong preferences for kiln-dried, 4/4 (2.54 cm) lumber having random length and width.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel dieser Untersuchung war die Bewertung der von der Holz verarbeitenden Industrie in den Vereinigten Staaten bevorzugten Holzeigenschaften und -arten einschliesslich derer Verwendungseigenschaften. Zu den Befragten gehörten Hersteller von Küchenmöbeln, Wohnmöbeln, Türen, Fenstern und Formteilen, die an regionalen und nationalen Veranstaltungen der Holzindustrie teilnahmen. Über 51% der Befragten hatten einen Jahresumsatz von unter USD 500000 und beschäftigten im Durchschnitt fünf Mitarbeiter. Die Untersuchung umfasste 17 ausgewählte Holzeigenschaften. Sie zeigte, dass aussehensrelevante Eigenschaften als am wichtigsten angesehen wurden, wohingegen die Verwendung von zertifiziertem Holz an letzter Stelle lag. Kostenfaktoren (einschliesslich eines niedrigen Preises und Preisstabilität) waren in der Regel von mittlerer Bedeutung. Signifikante Unterschiede ergaben sich für vier Eigenschaften zwischen den geographischen Regionen und für drei Eigenschaften zwischen den Herstellern der verschiedenen Produkte. Zu den beliebtesten Holzarten der verarbeitenden Betriebe zählten Eiche, Ahorn und Kirsche. Daneben wurde technisch getrocknetes, 1 Zoll dickes Holz mit variabler Länge und Breite besonders bevorzugt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brandt JP, Shook SR (2005) Attribute elicitation: Implications in the research context. Wood Fiber Sci 37(1):127–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Briggs DG, Bialozynski L (1995) Use of wood raw materials by the U.S. millwork industry in 1990. Forest Prod J 45(2):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bumgardner MS, Bowe SA (2002) Species selection in secondary wood products: implications for product design and promotion. Wood Fiber Sci 34(3):408–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bush RJ, Sinclair SA, Araman PA (1991) Determinant product and supplier attributes in domestic markets for hardwood lumber. Forest Prod J 41(2):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassens DL, Bradtmueller JP (1996) Characterization of the custom woodworking industry. Forest Prod J 46(5):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eastin I, Lane CL, Fight RD, Barbour RJ (1998) An assessment of the industrial markets for clearwood softwood lumber. Forest Prod J 48(11/12):48–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flowers JC, Hassler CC, Luppold WG (1990) Utilization of yellow-poplar in the architectural moulding and millwork industry. Forest Prod J 40(10):35–38

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forbes CL, Sinclair SA, Bush RJ, Araman PA (1994) Influence of product and supplier attributes on hardwood lumber purchase decisions in the furniture industry. Forest Prod J 44(2):51–56

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 730 p

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer CJ, Michael JH, Sinclair SA, Luppold WG (1992) Wood material use in the U.S. wood furniture industry. Forest Prod J 42(5):28–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olah D, Smith R, Hansen B (2003) Wood material use in the U.S. cabinet industry 1999 to 2001. Forest Prod J 53(1):25–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiedenbeck J, Brown J, Bennett N, Rast E (2003) Hardwood lumber widths and grades used by the furniture and cabinet industries: results of a 14 mill study. Forest Prod J 53(4):72–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Nicholls.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicholls, D., Roos, J. Lumber attributes, characteristics, and species preferences as indicated by secondary wood products firms in the continental United States. Holz Roh Werkst 64, 253–259 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-005-0071-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-005-0071-y

Keywords

Navigation