Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between cold water and steam for SPF lumber conditioning

Vergleich zwischen Kaltwasser- und Dampf-Konditionierung von SPF-Holz

  • ORIGINALARBEITEN · ORIGINALS
  • Published:
Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conditioning is an effective method to release drying stresses and improve final moisture content (MC) distribution for spruce-pine-subalpine fir (SPF) lumber during drying. There are currently two methods used in the industry to add moisture to lumber during conditioning, namely low-pressure steam spray and cold water spray. Sixteen kiln drying runs were carried out in a laboratory kiln. Two types of conditioning treatment were investigated: cold water spray and steam spray. Temperature profiles, final MC distribution and drying stresses obtained for lumber conditioned by the two methods were evaluated and then compared. Results indicated that there were no significant differences on drying temperature profiles and lumber quality between the two humidification systems. Therefore, both humidification systems can be used for controlling humidity during kiln drying and for conditioning treatments.

Zusammenfassung

Konditionieren stellt eine effektive Methode dar, um Trocknungsspannungen abzubauen, und um die endgültige Verteilung der Holzfeuchte in Fichten- Kiefern- Tannen-Holz während der Trocknung zu verbessern. Gegenwärtig werden in der holzverarbeitenden Industrie zum Konditionieren zwei Verfahren zum Befeuchten des Holzes verwendet: Sprühen mit Dampf bei niedrigem Druck, oder Sprühen mit Kaltwasser. Sechzehn Trocknungsläufe in einem Labortrockner wurden durchgeführt. Zwei Konditionierungsverfahren wurden untersucht: Kaltwasser- und Dampfsprühverfahren. Temperaturverläufe, Endfeuchteverteilung und Trocknungsspannungen bei Schnittholz das nach den genannten zwei Methoden konditioniert wurde, wurden untersucht und miteinander verglichen. Es zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede bezüglich der Auswirkung der Temperaturverteilung und der Schnittholzqualität zwischen beiden Verfahren. Deshalb lassen sich beide Verfahren zur Regelung der Feuchte während der Labortrocknung und zum Konditionieren anwenden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 Abb. 1
Fig. 2 Abb. 2
Fig. 3 Abb. 3
Fig. 4 Abb. 4
Fig. 5 Abb. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hart CA (1990) Kiln overheat when conditioning lumber. Forest Prod J 40(4):9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslett AN (1998) Drying radiata pine in New Zealand. FRI-bulletin. No.206

  • Haslett TI, Riley S, Riley S (2001) Comparison of final conditioning using water sprays and water bath steaming. In: Proceedings of 7th International IUFRO Wood Drying Conference, pp 90–94

  • Moren T (1994) Steam conditioning after low temperature drying. Holz Roh- Werkstoff 52:77–82

  • Ugolev BN, Glebashev SA, Skuratov NV, Shchedrina EB (1991) An energy-saving technique of treating lumber with water after kiln-drying, in order to relieve stresses. Derevoobrabatyvayushchaya-Promyshlennost 4:16–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Forintek Canada Corp. would like to thank its industry and goverment members for their guidance and financial support for this research. Special thanks to Mr. T.H. Briggs, Mr. Ross Johnson and Mr. Gerry Vandergaag from West Fraser Mills Ltd. and to André Friolet from Slocan Group-Mackenzie Division for providing the SPF lumber, and Mr. Darryl Klassen from MEC Systems Inc. for providing the cold water spray system used during the tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. C. Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, L., Oliveira, L.C. A comparison between cold water and steam for SPF lumber conditioning. Holz Roh Werkst 62, 465–469 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0521-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0521-y

Keywords

Navigation