Skip to main content
Log in

Gastroenteropankreatische neuroendokrine Tumoren

Zielgerichtete Diagnostik und Therapie

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Targeted diagnostics and therapy

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Gastroenteropankreatische neuroendokrine Tumoren (GEP-NET) sind selten, aber in ihrer Inzidenz weltweit steigend. GEP-NET sind mit 70 % die häufigsten NET. Außerhalb des Magen-Darm-Traktes finden sich NET in der Lunge (25 %), selten in der Haut, im Urogenitaltrakt und in den Ovarien.

GEP-NET zeigen abhängig von ihrer Lokalisation, Größe, Differenzierung (G1–G3) und der möglichen Freisetzung von Hormonen unterschiedlichste Symptome. Die Krankheitsverläufe der Patienten sind hoch variabel. Patienten mit gut differenzierten G1-NET haben langsame, teilweise auch benigne Verläufe über Jahrzehnte. Daneben zeigen schlecht differenzierte Tumoren (G3) aggressive, kurze Verläufe mit einem frühen Metastasierungsmuster. Fast die Hälfte der Patienten mit NET-Tumoren haben bereits Lymphknoten- oder Lebermetastasen bei Erstdiagnose. Trotzdem stieg die 5- und 10-Jahres-Überlebensrate (JÜL) der Patienten mit NET-Tumoren an (5-JÜL 80 %; 10-JÜL 60 %), was auch durch eine immer bessere interdisziplinären Behandlung (Chirurgie, Endokrinologie, Onkologie, Nuklearmedizin, Radiologe) bedingt ist.

Abstract

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are rare but an increase in incidence has been recognized worldwide. Approximately 70 % of NETs are localized in the gastrointestinal tract and in the pancreas, other locations are in the lungs (25 %) and rarely in the skin, urogenital tract and ovaries. Depending on the size, localization, grading (G1–G3) and production of hormones, the symptoms of patients can greatly vary. Outcome and survival of patients depend on the biological behavior and grading of the NET. Patients with a well differentiated G1 grade NET have a slow, sometimes also benign course over decades even with metastases in contrast to patients with G3 grade NETs. These tumors exhibit an aggressive behavior and patient survival is short. Liver and lymph node metastases are common (about 50 %) in GEP-NETs even at the initial diagnosis. The 5-year and 10-year survival of patients with GEP-NETs is increasing (currently approximately 80 % and 60 %, respectively), especially when a multidisciplinary team (e.g. surgery, endocrinology, oncology, nuclear medicine and gastroenterology) manages GEP-NET patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Oberndorfer S (1907) Karzinoide Tumoren des Dünndarmes. Frankf Z Pathol 1:425–432

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niederle MB, Hackl M, Kaserer K, Niederle B (2010) Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: the current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European neuroendoctrine tumour society classification: an analysis based on prospectively collected parameters. Endocr Relat Cancer 17:909–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schott M, Klöppel G, Raffel A et al (2011) Gastroenteropankreatische neuroendokrine Neoplasien. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108:305–312

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scherübl H, Streller B, Stabenow R et al (2013) Clinically detected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are on the rise. World J Gastroenterol 19:9012–9019

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A et al (2011) The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendcrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40:1–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito T, Igarashi H, Nakamura K et al (2014) Epidemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointetinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis. J Gastroenterol (epub ahead of print)

  7. Gabriel M, Decristoforo C, Kendler D et al (2007) 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octrotid PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 48:508–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li TT, Qiu F, Zhi RQ et al (2014) Classification, clinicopathologic features asnd treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 20:118–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 95:74–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scherübl H, Cadiot G, Jensen RT et al (2010) Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomac (gastric carcinoids) are on the rise: small tumors, small problems? Endoscopy 42:664–671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Langer P et al (2005) Outcome of duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Ann Surg 242:757–766

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao H, Niu G, Yang M et al (2011) PET of insulinoma using (18)-F-FBEM-EM3106B, a new GLP-1 analogue. Mol Pharm 8:1775–1782

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Brandi ML et al (2012) ENETS Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology 95:98–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulke MH, Bergsland EK, Yao JC (2009) Glycemic control in patients with insulinoma treated with everolimus. N Engl J Med 360:195–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bettini R, Partelli S, Boninsegna L (2011) Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor. Surgery 150:5–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV (2012) Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2990–3011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B et al (2012) ENETS Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology 95:120–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Öhrvall U, Eriksson B, Juhlin C et al (2000) Method for dissection of mesenteric metastases in mid-gut carcinoid tumors. World J Surg 24:1402–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capurso G, Rinzivillo M, Bettini R et al (2012) Systemic review of resection of primary midgut carcinoid tumour in patients with unresectable liver metastases. Br J Surg 99:1480–1487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pape UF, Perren A, Niederle B et al (2012) ENETS Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms from the jejuno-ileum and the appendix including goblet cell carcinoms. Neuroendocrinology 95:135–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramage JK, Ahmed A, Ardill J et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancretic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETS). Gut 61:6–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Caplin M, Sundin A, Nillson O et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 95:88–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Begum N, Maasberg S, Plöckinger U et al (2013) Neuroendokrine Tumoren des Verdauungstrakts- Daten des deutschen NET-Registers. Zentralbl Chir. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1315199

  24. Frilling A, Modlin IM, Kidd M et al (2014) Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Lancet Oncol 15:e8–e21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of the foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology 95:157–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Capurso G, Bettini R, Rinzivillo M et al (2011) Role of resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour only in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease: a systemic review. Neuroendocrinology 93:223–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Osborne DA, Zervos EE, Strosberg J et al (2006) Improved outcome with cytoreduction versus embolization for symptomatic hepatic metatases of carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 13:572–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy AS, Dezarn WA, McNeillie P et al (2008) Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90 Y –microspheres: early results in 148 patients. Am J Clin Oncol 31:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T et al (2011) Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 364:514–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL (2011) Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 364:501–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. K. Holzer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Holzer FEBS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holzer, K. Gastroenteropankreatische neuroendokrine Tumoren. Chirurg 85, 731–744 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2679-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-013-2679-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation