Skip to main content
Log in

Forschung als Attraktivitätsparameter für junge Chirurgen

Research as attractiveness parameter for young surgeons

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In der Chirurgie zeichnet sich ein beträchtlicher Nachwuchsmangel ab. Da die Forschung im Kontext der chirurgischen Aus- und Weiterbildung ein wesentliches Moment der Attraktion für das Fach Chirurgie darstellt, ist es dringliche Aufgabe, klare Forschungsfreiräume in die Konzepte der Aus- und Weiterbildung zu implementieren. Im vorliegenden Artikel werden die Relevanz sowohl der studienbegleitenden Promotion als auch der Forschungstätigkeit während der chirurgischen Weiterbildung für das klinische Selbstverständnis, die persönliche Zufriedenheit und die akademische Entwicklung des jungen Chirurgen aufgezeigt.

Abstract

Increasing concern has been expressed about the significant shortage of new trainees in surgery. As research in the context of surgical education and training is an essential element of attraction for the field of surgery, there is an urgent priority to implement clear room for research in the concepts of education and training. In this article the relevance of both the thesis accompanying the study and research training during surgical residency for the clinical self-image, personal satisfaction and academic development of young surgeons will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Mülller W (2008) AWMF-Stellungnahme: Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Medizin schon in der studentischen Ausbildung (21.05.2008) www.egms.de/static/pdf/journals/awmf/2008-5/awmf000155.pdf

  2. Schult M, Vowinkel T, Senninger N (2001) How are beginning students in surgery selected? Results of a survey of German consultant surgeons. Chirurg 72:621–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein P, Stiehler M, Haasper C (2010) Survey of the simultaneous management of clinical and research burdens in German University orthopaedic and trauma departments. Z Orthop Unfall 148:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang D, Meyer RE (2003) Effect of two Howard Hughes Medical Institute research training programs for medical students on the likelihood of pursuing research careers. Acad Med 78:1271–1280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ko CY, Whang EE, Longmire WP Jr, McFadden DW (2000) Improving the Surgeon’s participation in research: is It a problem of training or priority? J Surg Res 91:5–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ansorg J, Hassan I, Fendrich V et al (2005) Quality of surgical continuing education in Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 130:508–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scheuerlein H, Settmacher U (2010) Some thoughts on surgical education and training – past, present and future. Zentralbl Chir 135:451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reismann M, Ellerkamp V, Dingemann J (2010) Working and training conditions of residents in pediatric surgery: a nationwide survey in Germany. Eur J Pediatr Surg 20:294–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ríos Zambudio A, Sánchez Gascón F, González Moro L et al (2004) Research training during medical residency (MIR). Satisfaction questionnaire. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 96:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neacy K, Stern SA, Kim HM, Dronen SC (2000) Resident perception of academic skills training and impact on academic career choice. Acad Emerg Med 7:1408–1415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS (2001) Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 98:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitch KK, Walker PM (2000) Surgeon compensation and motivation. Arch Surg 135:708–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson KD, Mavis BE (1995) The relationship between career satisfaction and fellowship training in academic surgeons. Am J Surg 169:329–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunn JC, Lai EC, Brooks CM et al (1998) The outcome of research training during surgical residency. J Pediatr Surg 33:362–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson CM, Klingensmith ME, Coopersmith CM (2007) Long-term outcomes of performing a postdoctoral research fellowship during general surgery residency. Ann Surg 245:516–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Henke PK, Kish P, Stanley JC (2002) Relevance of basic laboratory and clinical research activities as part of the vascular surgery fellowship: an assessment by program directors and postfellowship surgeons. J Vasc Surg 36:1083–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schürmann G, Anthoni C, Fischer RJ et al (1999) Foreign research position in the career development of academic surgeons. Chirurg 70:310–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thakur A, Thakur V, Fonkalsrud EW et al (2000) The outcome of research training during surgical residency. J Surg Res 90:10–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Vollmar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vollmar, B. Forschung als Attraktivitätsparameter für junge Chirurgen. Chirurg 83, 319–322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2220-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-011-2220-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation