Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Bei etwa 10 % aller hospitalisierten Patienten kommt es zu unerwarteten Zwischenfällen, die mit einer erhöhten Letalität einhergehen. Die Etablierung von innerklinischen Notfallteams nimmt deshalb immer höheren Stellenwert in der interdisziplinären Notfallversorgung einer Klinik ein. Dabei variiert die Versorgung der Patienten ja nach Krankenhäusern und Regionen.
Ziel der Arbeit
Die Versorgung innerklinischer Notfallpatienten des Universitätsklinikums Köln im Vierjahreszeitraum von 2013 bis 2016 soll analysiert und deskriptiv dargestellt werden.
Material und Methode
Grundlage der vorliegenden Datenanalyse waren innerklinische Notfalleinsätze des Universitätsklinikums Köln („5555-Team“ der Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin). Im Untersuchungszeitraum vom 01.01.2013 bis zum 31.12.2016 wurde jeder telefonische Alarm bezüglich des Einsatzstichworts, des Einsatzorts sowie der Einsatzzeiten in einem standardisierten Protokoll dokumentiert. Die Datenanalyse erfolgte retrospektiv und deskriptiv. Ein Ethikvotum war nicht erforderlich. Die Registrierungsnummer auf ClinicalTrials.gov lautet NCT03786445.
Ergebnisse
Insgesamt wurden 1664 Notfallanrufe im Analysezeitraum ausgewertet. Im Studienverlauf von 2013 bis 2016 stiegen die Anzahl der Einsätze insgesamt um 11,4 %, die gesamte Einsatzzeit um 29,5 % und die durchschnittliche Einsatzzeit um 14,3 % an. Das führende Einsatzstichwort war „Kollaps/Synkope“ und machte 29 % des Ausrückegrunds aus. Bei steigenden Pflegetagen innerhalb des Versorgungsgeländes waren 6,5 % der Einsätze Reanimationsbehandlungen. Das Einsatzaufkommen sank zum Wochenende um 50 % im Vergleich zum Einsatzaufkommen an Wochentagen.
Schlussfolgerung
Über die letzten 4 Jahre zeigte sich eine deutliche Steigerung der Einsatzzahlen, der gesamten Einsatzzeit und der durchschnittlichen Einsatzdauer. Der führende Alarmierungsgrund war in den Jahren 2013–2016 das Stichwort „Kollaps/Synkope“. Jeder 17. Einsatz war eine Reanimation. Die Inzidenz von Herz-Kreislauf-Stillständen sank im Verlauf des Analysezeitraums.
Abstract
Background
Recent studies demonstrated that in-hospital emergencies are linked to a higher patient mortality. In approximately 10% of patients an unexpected incident occurs during the hospital stay. Therefore, the establishment of in-hospital medical emergency teams (MET) is becoming more important in the interdisciplinary emergency treatment. The aim of this study was an analysis of medical documentation, operational tactics and procedures taken by MET of the University Hospital of Cologne in a 4-year period ranging from 2013 to 2016.
Material and methods
A retrospective analysis of 1664 emergency forms from MET activities at the University Hospital of Cologne from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 was carried out. Every MET activation call via the emergency telephone number (5555) and subsequent emergency treatment was recorded using a standardized documentation form. The registry number on ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT03786445.
Results
There were 1664 emergency team calls in the whole study period. Between 2013 (404 calls) and 2016 (461 calls) the number of calls increased by 11.4%. The total mission time of the MET increased in the study period from 8342 min (2013) to 10,800 min (2016, +29.5%) and the average mission time increased from 2013 (35 min) to 2016 (40 min) by 14.3%. The primary reason for activation was collapse or syncope and was the underlying cause for 29% of calls. The number of deployments for emergencies at weekends was 50% of those during weekdays and 6.5% of the calls were for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
Conclusion
Analysis of data revealed that the number of MET calls, total operating time and average deployment time increased from 2013 to 2016. The primary reason for MET activations was collapse or syncope and every 17th deployment was for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrests decreased during the study period.
Literatur
Franklin C, Mathew J (1994) Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med 22(2):244–247
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (2004) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991. Qual Saf Health Care 13(2):145–151 (discussion 151–152)
Baker GR, Norton PG, Tamblyn R et al (2004) The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 170(11):1678–1686
Winters BD, Pham JC, Pronovost PJ et al (2007) Rapid response systems: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 35(5):1238–1243
Hillman K, Chen J (2005) investigators MERIT study et al. Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9477):2091–2097
Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Anderson J et al (1999) Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust 171(1):22–25
Galhotra S, DeVita MA (2007) Members of the Medical Emergency Response Improvement Team (MERIT) et. al. Mature rapid response system and potentially avoidable cardiopulmonary arrests in hospital. Qual Saf Health Care 16(4):260–265
Skogvoll E, Isern E, Gisvold SE et al (1999) In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 5 years’ incidence and survival according to the Utstein template. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43(2):177–184
Buist MD, Moore GE, Nguyen TV et al (2002) Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ 324(7334):387–390
Konrad D, Jäderling G, Martling CR et al (2010) Reducing in-hospital cardiac arrests and hospital mortality by introducing a medical emergency team. Intensive Care Med 36(1):100–106
Santamaria J, Tobin A, Holmes J (2010) Changing cardiac arrest and hospital mortality rates through a medical emergency team takes time and constant review. Crit Care Med 38(2):445–450
Foraida MI, DeVita MA, Simmons RL et al (2003) Improving the utilization of medical crisis teams (Condition C) at an urban tertiary care hospital. J Crit Care 18(2):87–94
Jones D, Bates S, Bellomo R et al (2005) Circadian pattern of activation of the medical emergency team in a teaching hospital. Crit Care 9(4):R303–6
Sebat F, Johnson D, Saari M et al (2005) A multidisciplinary community hospital program for early and rapid resuscitation of shock in nontrauma patients. Chest 127(5):1729–1743
Sharek PJ, Parast LM, Roth SJ et al (2007) Effect of a rapid response team on hospital-wide mortality and code rates outside the ICU in a Children’s Hospital. JAMA 298(19):2267–2274
Peberdy MA, Cretikos M, Abella BS, DeVita M, Goldhill D, Kloeck W et al (2007) Recommended guidelines for monitoring, reporting, and conducting research on medical emergency team, outreach, and rapid response systems: An Utstein-style scientific statement. Circulation 116(21):2481–2500
Gräsner JT, Seewald S et al (2014) German resuscitation registry: science and resuscitation research. Anaesthesist 63(6):470–476
Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Gutteridge GA et al (2003) prospective before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team. Med J Aust 179(6):283–287
Herod R, Frost SA, Aneman A et al (2014) Long term trends in medical emergency team activations and outcomes. Resuscitation 85(8):1083–1087
Yousaf M, Bano S, Hussain SW et al (2018) Comparison of Hospital-Wide Code Rates and Mortality Before and After the Implementation of a Rapid Response Team. Cureus 10(1):e2043
Chen J, Bellomo R, MERIT Study Investigators for the Simpson Centre and the ANZICS Clinical Trials et al (2010) Triggers for emergency team activation: a multicenter assessment. J Crit Care 25(2):359.e1–359.e7
Mullins CF, Psirides A (2016) Activities of a Medical Emergency Team: a prospective observational study of 795 calls. Anaesth Intensive Care 44(1):34–43
Psirides AJ, Hill J, Jones D (2016) Rapid Response Team activation in New Zealand hospitals—a multicentre prospective observational study. Anaesth Intensive Care 44(3):391–397
Silva R, Saraiva M, Aragão IC et al (2016) Medical Emergency Team: How do we play when we stay? Characterization of MET actions at the scene. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 24:33
Smith RL, Hayashi VN, Felner K et al (2014) The medical emergency team call: a sentinel event that triggers goals of care discussion. Crit Care Med 42(2):322–327
Le Guen MP, Tobin AE, Reid D (2015) Intensive care unit admission in patients following rapid response team activation: call factors, patient characteristics and hospital outcomes. Anaesth Intensive Care 43(2):211–215
Fernando SM, Reardon PM, Kyeremanteng K et al (2018) Impact of nighttime Rapid Response Team activation on outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute deterioration. Crit Care 22(1):67
Chen J, Bellomo R et al (2009) The relationship between early emergency team calls and serious adverse events. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):148–153
Akhtar N, Field RA, Perkins GD et al (2012) Quality of in-hospital cardiac arrest calls: a prospective observational study. Bmj Qual Saf 21(3):184–190
Calzavacca P, Licari E, Bellomo R et al (2008) A prospective study of factors influencing the outcome of patients after a Medical Emergency Team review. Intensive Care Med 34(11):2112–2116
Boniatti MM, Azzolini N, Filho EM et al (2014) Delayed medical emergency team calls and associated outcomes. Crit Care Med 42(1):26–30
Guinane JL, Bucknall TK, Jones DA et al (2013) Missed medical emergency team activations: tracking decisions and outcomes in practice. Crit Care Resusc 15(4):266–272
Kim GW, Koh Y, Hong SB et al (2014) Does medical emergency team intervention reduce the prevalence of emergency endotracheal intubation complications? Yonsei Med J 55(1):92–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
J. Schmitz, S. Kerkhoff, D. Sander, G. Schulz, T. Warnecke und J. Hinkelbein geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitz, J., Kerkhoff, S., Sander, D. et al. Einsätze des innerklinischen Notfallteams eines überregionalen Maximalversorgers. Anaesthesist 68, 361–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-0586-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-0586-y