Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative Anwendung von Metamizol und anderen Nichtopioidanalgetika bei Kindern

Ergebnisse einer Umfrage

Perioperative use of metamizole and other nonopioid analgesics in children

Results of a survey

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Nichtsteroidale Antiphlogistika (NSAID, „nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs“), Paracetamol und Metamizol werden täglich zur Akutschmerztherapie bei Kindern eingesetzt. Die Datenlage zum Stellenwert von Metamizol in der klinischen Praxis ist unzureichend.

Ziel der Arbeit

Überblick zur aktuell praktizierten Anwendung von Nichtopioidanalgetika perioperativ bei Kindern sowie zu beobachteten Nebenwirkungen und zur Aufklärung bei der Therapie mit Metamizol.

Methodik

Mitglieder der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin und der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft erhielten einen Online-Fragebogen.

Ergebnisse

Von den 2284 antwortenden Umfrageteilnehmern gaben 1476 an, regelmäßig Kinder perioperativ zu versorgen. NSAID wurden von 83,9 %, Metamizol von 68,6 % und Paracetamol von 67,5 % der Teilnehmer eingesetzt. Intraoperativ wurde Metamizol bevorzugt, postoperativ wurden die 3 Nichtopioidanalgetika etwa gleich häufig verwendet. Bei starken Schmerzen kombinierten 49,3 % Metamizol mit einem anderen Nichtopioidanalgetikum, 14,8 % verabreichten es als einziges Nichtopioidanalgetikum. Vollständig auf Metamizol verzichteten 23,2 % der Umfrageteilnehmer. Die meist gewählte Einzeldosis lag bei 8–15 mg/kgKG: über 16 mg/kgKG dosierten 26 %. Zeitlich befristet wurde Metamizol von 20,2 % der Teilnehmer eingesetzt. Fälle einer Agranulozytose wurden von 2 Teilnehmern beschrieben (0,14 %). Blutbildkontrollen zum Monitoring der Metamizoltherapie und eine Aufklärung der Eltern über potenzielle Risiken einer Metamizolmedikation wurden selten durchgeführt.

Diskussion

Die Umfrage bestätigt die häufige perioperative Anwendung von Metamizol bei Kindern. Intraoperativ war Metamizol das bevorzugte Nichtopioidanalgetikum. Das Monitoring der Metamizoltherapie und die Patienteninformation sollten verbessert werden.

Abstract

Background

Nonopioid analgesics are frequently used for perioperative pain management in children. In many countries, the nonopioid metamizole (dipyrone) is administered as an alternative to paracetamol and traditional NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), such as ibuprofen and diclofenac; however, concerns over possible life-threatening adverse events (agranulocytosis) have prompted a debate over the use of metamizole.

Objective

To investigate current practice and use of nonopioid analgesics, particularly of metamizole in children younger than 14 years, in the perioperative setting. Furthermore, metamizole-related side effects, safety and approaches used to inform patients were addressed.

Methods

A link to an online questionnaire on the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics in children, with a specific focus on dipyrone, was sent by e‑mail to members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and to members of the German Pain Society.

Results

A total of 2284 anesthesiologists filled out the questionnaire. Of these, 1476 were involved in the perioperative care of children younger than 14 years. The majority of respondents worked in German hospitals (90.5%) but Austria, Switzerland and the Netherlands were also among the countries represented. Of the respondents, 99.1% reported using nonopioid analgesics in the perioperative setting. The NSAID, metamizole, paracetamol and COX-2 inhibitors were administered by 83.9%, 68.6%, 67.5% and 2% of the respondents, respectively. Intravenous metamizole was the preferred nonopioid analgesic during surgical procedures, but following surgery, NSAID, metamizole and paracetamol were given with the same frequency by anesthesiologists. Of the respondents, 49.3% reported using metamizole in combination with another nonopioid analgesic in cases of severe pain, 14.8% used it as the sole nonopioid analgesic, and 23.2% never used it at all. Nearly half of the respondents administered metamizole i.v. in doses of 15 mg/kg body weight or lower, whereas 26% administered doses of at least 16 mg/kg up to more than 20 mg/kg. Of the physicians, 298 (20.2%) restricted the duration of metamizole use, varying between one single administration (4.7%), administration for 1 day (27.5%), or for 1–2 weeks (29.2%). Of the anesthesiologists, 65.6% reported no metamizole-related adverse effects. Allergic reactions/anaphylaxis and a drop in blood pressure requiring intervention were observed by 3–4% of the respondents. No change in blood cell counts within the last 2 years was reported by 73.1% of the respondents, whereas 17 anesthesiologists (1.3%) had observed children with altered blood cell counts, with 2 (0.14%) reporting agranulocytosis. In most cases these were incidental findings. No severe sequelae or deaths were reported. Few respondents (5.5%) performed routine blood cell counts to monitor metamizole therapy. Furthermore, only a minority always (3.5%) or sometimes (6.1%) informed a child’s parents of possible side effects of treatment with metamizole.

Conclusion

The survey confirmed that metamizole is frequently used in children in the perioperative setting. Intravenous metamizole is the preferred nonopioid analgesic administered intraoperatively for pain prophylaxis. Clinical symptoms of agranulocytosis should be monitored and patients should be better informed about metamizole-related side effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Blaser LS, Tramonti A, Egger P et al (2015) Hematological safety of metamizole: retrospective analysis of WHO and Swiss spontaneous safety reports. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71:209–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremerich DH, Neidhart G, Roth B et al (2001) Postoperative Schmerztherapie im Kindesalter. Ergenisse einer repäsentativen Umfrage in Deutschland. Anaesthesist 50:102–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bu X, Yang L, Zuo Y (2015) Efficacy and safety of perioperative parecoxib for acute postoperative pain treatment in children: a meta-analysis. Front Med 9:496–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Caliskan E, Sener M, Kocum A et al (2013) The efficacy of intravenous paracetamol versus dipyrone for postoperative analgesia after day-case lower abdominal surgery in children with spinal anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 13:34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. De Leeuw TG, Dirckx M, Gonzalez CA et al (2017) The use of dipyrone (metamizol) as an analgesic in children: What is the evidence? A review. Paediatr Anaesth 27:1193–1201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fieler M, Eich C, Becke K et al (2015) Metamizole for postoperative pain therapy in 1177 children: a prospective, multicentre, observational, postauthorisation safety study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 32:839–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haen E, Höffler D, Stammschulte T (2013) Tödliche Agranulozytose unter Novaminsulfon—aus Fehlern lernen. Arzneiverordn Prax 40:46–47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunseler C, Roth B, Pothmann R et al (2005) Intramuskuläre injektionen im Kindesalter. Schmerz 19:140–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Isik M, Kaya Z, Belen FB et al (2014) Life-threatening agranulocytosis, anemia, and plasmacytosis after dipyrone use for fever in a child. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 36:e46–e48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Köbberling J, von Alpen R (2017) Metamizol und Agranulozytose – Aufklärungspflicht. Rheinisches Arztebl 5:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kocum AI, Sener M, Caliskan E et al (2013) Intravenous paracetamol and dipyrone for postoperative analgesia after day-case tonsillectomy in children: a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 79:89–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotter T, Da Costa BR, Fassler M et al (2015) Metamizole-associated adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e122918

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Messerer B, Grogl G, Stromer W et al (2014) Perioperative systemische Schmerztherapie bei Kindern: Österreichische interdiszplinäre Handlungsempfehlungen zum perioperativen Schmerzmanagement bei Kindern. Schmerz 28:43–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murto K, Lamontagne C, Mcfaul C et al (2015) Celecoxib pharmacogenetics and pediatric adenotonsillectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled study. Can J Anaesth 62:785–797

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reist L, Erlenwein J, Meissner W et al (2018) Dipyrone is the preferred nonopioid analgesic for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. A survey of clinical practice in German-speaking countries. Eur J Pain 22:1103–1112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rollason V, Desmeules JA (2015) Use of metamizole in children and the risk of agranulocytosis: Is the benefit worth the risk? Eur J Anaesthesiol 32:837–838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sener M, Kocum A, Caliskan E et al (2015) Administration of paracetamol versus dipyrone by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief in children after tonsillectomy. Braz J Anesthesiol 65:476–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Souki MA (2016) Metamizole for postoperative pain therapy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33:785–786

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stamer UM, Gundert-Remy U, Biermann E et al (2017) Metamizol: Überlegungen zum Monitoring zur frühzeitigen Diagnose einer Agranulozytose. Schmerz 31:5–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stamer UM, Stuber F (2018) Analgesic efficacy of dipyrone in children: still an absence of evidence. Paediatr Anaesth 28:748–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stammschulte T, Ludwig WD, Muhlbauer B et al (2015) Metamizole (dipyrone)-associated agranulocytosis. An analysis of German spontaneous reports 1990–2012. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71:1129–1138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sümpelmann R, Fieler M, Eich C et al (2017) Metamizole for postoperative pain therapy in infants younger than 1 year. Eur J Pediatr Surg 27:269–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tavil B, Cetin M, Gumruk F et al (2014) Metamizole-induced bicytopenia reversed by G‑CSF and IVIG treatment in a child. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:117–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Treiblmaier H (2011) Datenqualität und Validität bei Online-Befragungen. Markt 50:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uetrecht JP (1996) Reactive metabolites and agranulocytosis. Eur J Haematol Suppl 60:83–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waeschle RM, Russo SG, Sliwa B et al (2015) Perioperatives Wärmemanagement in Abhängigkeit von der Krankenhausgröße in Deutschland. Anaesthesist 64:612–622

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zahn PK, Sabatowski R, Schug SA et al (2010) Paracetamol for perioperative analgesia. Old substance—new insights. Anaesthesist 59:940–952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeiner E, Blaser LS, Tisljar K et al (2015) Fatale Agranulocytose nach Metamizol-Reexposition. Praxis (Bern 1994) 104:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zernikow B, Smale H, Michel E et al (2006) Paediatric cancer pain management using the WHO analgesic ladder—results of a prospective analysis from 2265 treatment days during a quality improvement study. Eur J Pain 10:587–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autoren danken der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) und der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft, die den Versand der Fragen an ihre Mitglieder über ihren E‑Mail-Verteiler vorgenommen haben. Vielen Dank allen, die das Projekt durch ihre Teilnahme an der Befragung ermöglicht haben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Stamer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Witschi, L. Reist, T. Stammschulte, J. Erlenwein, K. Becke und U. Stamer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Witschi, L., Reist, L., Stammschulte, T. et al. Perioperative Anwendung von Metamizol und anderen Nichtopioidanalgetika bei Kindern. Anaesthesist 68, 152–160 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-018-0532-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-018-0532-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation