Skip to main content
Log in

Hepatorenales Syndrom

Hepatorenal syndrome

  • CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Der Anaesthesist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Das hepatorenale Syndrom (HRS) umschreibt ein Nierenversagen, das bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittener Leberzirrhose im Zusammenhang mit einer Beeinträchtigung der systemischen Zirkulation auftritt. Die Inzidenz des HRS beträgt bei Patienten mit Aszites 8 %; die Gesamthäufigkeit des Nierenversagens beträgt in der Endphase des Leberversagens 75 %. Als ursächlich wird ein Fortschreiten der bei Lebererkrankungen auftretenden arteriellen Vasodilatation im Splanchnikusstromgebiet zusammen mit einer Verringerung des Herzzeitvolumens (HZV) angesehen. Es existieren 2 Typen des HRS: Beim HRS-Typ 1 kommt es zu einem schnellen Nierenversagen, das oftmals im Zusammenhang einer spontan-bakteriellen Peritonitis (SBP) auftritt und zügig in ein Multiorganversagen übergehen kann. Der HRS-Typ 2 ist durch eine langsame Entwicklung des Nierenversagens, zusammen mit der Zunahme des Aszites, gekennzeichnet. Die Prognose ist beim HRS-Typ 1 am schlechtesten. Die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen beim HRS (u. a. Gabe von Vasokonstriktoren und Albumin, Anlage eines transjugulären intrahepatischen Shunt, TIPS) können die Überlebensrate nur teilweise verbessern; die einzige definitive Behandlung stellt die Lebertransplantation dar.

Abstract

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique form of acute renal failure occurring in patients with advanced cirrhosis or acute liver failure. In patients with ascites the incidence of HRS is 8 % and in end-stage liver disease 75 % of patients suffer from HRS. Vasodilation of splanchnic arteries with subsequent decrease of effective blood volume, arterial pressure and renal vasoconstriction is hypothesized to be the central pathophysiological mechanism leading to acute renal failure. Moreover, cardiac output might be decreased in advanced cirrhosis. There are two types of HRS: while HRS type 1 is characterized by a rapid progression to acute renal failure often triggered by a precipitating event, e. g. bacterial peritonitis, which can rapidly develop into multiorgan failure, HRS type 2 shows a more steadily or slowly progressive course to renal failure with increasing ascites. Type 1 HRS has the worst prognosis. Treatment options include pharmacological treatment with vasoconstrictors and albumin and placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) but can only partially improve the survival rate. Liver transplantation is the ultimate and only definitive treatment of patients with HRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Helvig FC, Schutz CB (1932) A liver and kidney syndrome: clinical, pathological, and experimental studies. Surg Gynecol Obstet 55:570–582

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hecker R, Sherlock S (1956) Electrolyte and circulatory changes in terminal liver failure. Lancet 271:1121–1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wadei HM, Mai ML, Ahsan N, Gonwa TA (2006) Hepatorenal syndrome: pathophysiology and management. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:1066–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ginès P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rodés J (2003) Hepatorenal syndrome. Lancet 362:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginès A, Escorsell A, Ginès P et al (1993) Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of the hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis with ascites. Gastroenterology 105:229–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ginès P, Schrier RW (2009) Renal failure in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 361:1279–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salerno F, Gerbes A, Ginès P et al (2008) Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Postgrad Med J 84:662–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alessandria C, Ozdogan O, Guevara M et al (2005) MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome: relevance to liver transplantation. Hepatology 41:1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M et al (1988) Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology 8:1151–1157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wadei HM, Gonwa TA (2013) Hepatorenal syndrome in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med 28:79–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin PY, Ginès P, Schrier RW (1998) Nitric oxide as a mediator of hemodynamic abnormalities and sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 339:533–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kashani A, Landaverde C, Medici V, Rossaro L (2008) Fluid retention in cirrhosis: pathophysiology and management. QJM 101:71–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Henriksen JH, Ring-Larsen H (1994) Hepatorenal disorders: role of the sympathetic nervous system. Semin Liver Dis 14:35–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Gaskari SA, Lee SS (2006) Cardiac and vascular changes in cirrhosis: pathogenic mechanisms. World J Gastroenterol 12:837–842

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Monescillo A, Arocena C et al (2005) Circulatory function and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology 42:439–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Persson PB, Ehmke H, Nafz B, Kirchheim HR (1990) Sympathetic modulation of renal autoregulation by carotid occlusion in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 258:F364–F370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Colle I, Durand F, Pessione F et al (2002) Clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome treated with Terlipressin: a retrospective analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:882–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiest R, Groszmann RJ (1999) Nitric oxide and portal hypertension: its role in the regulation of intrahepatic and splanchnic vascular resistance. Semin Liver Dis 19:411–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong F, Nadim MK, Kellum JA et al (2011) Working Party proposal for a revised classification system of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. Gut 60:702–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin A, Warnock DG, Mehta RL et al (2007) Improving outcomes from acute kidney injury: report of an initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 50:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernández J, Navasa M, Planas R et al (2007) Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 133:818–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V et al (1999) Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med 341:403–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Akriviadis E, Botla R, Briggs W et al (2000) Pentoxifylline improves short-term survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 119:1637–1648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM (2012) Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology 55:1172–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alessandria C, Elia C, Mezzabotta L et al (2011) Prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis: standard vs half albumin doses. A prospective, randomized, unblinded pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 43:881–886

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gonwa TA, Morris CA, Goldstein RM et al (1991) Long-term survival and renal function following liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatorenal syndrome–experience in 300 patients. Transplantation 51:428–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Soper CP, Latif AB, Bending MR (1996) Amelioration of hepatorenal syndrome with selective endothelin-A antagonist. Lancet 347:1842–1843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ginès A, Salmerón JM, Ginès P et al (1993) Oral misoprostol or intravenous prostaglandin E2 do not improve renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites with hyponatremia or renal failure. J Hepatol 17:220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barnardo DE, Baldus WP, Maher FT (1970) Effects of dopamine on renal function in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 58:524–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guevara M, Ginès P, Fernández-Esparrach G et al (1998) Reversibility of hepatorenal syndrome by prolonged administration of ornipressin and plasma volume expansion. Hepatology 27:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Skagen C, Einstein M, Lucey MR, Said A (2009) Combination treatment with octreotide, midodrine, and albumin improves survival in patients with type 1 and type 2 hepatorenal syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:680–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Angeli P, Volpin R, Piovan D et al (1998) Acute effects of the oral administration of midodrine, an alpha-adrenergic agonist, on renal hemodynamics and renal function in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Hepatology 28:937–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Duvoux C, Zanditenas D, Hézode C et al (2002) Effects of noradrenalin and albumin in patients with type I hepatorenal syndrome: a pilot study. Hepatology 36:374–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gluud LL, Christensen K, Christensen E, Krag A (2010) Systematic review of randomized trials on vasoconstrictor drugs for hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology 51:576–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brensing KA, Textor J, Perz J et al (2000) Long term outcome after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in non-transplant cirrhotics with hepatorenal syndrome: a phase II study. Gut 47:288–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Guevara M, Ginès P, Bandi JC et al (1998) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in hepatorenal syndrome: effects on renal function and vasoactive systems. Hepatology 28:416–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rössle M, Gerbes AL (2010) TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome and hepatic hydrothorax: a critical update. Gut 59:988–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Witzke O, Baumann M, Patschan D et al (2004) Which patients benefit from hemodialysis therapy in hepatorenal syndrome? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:1369–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Capling RK, Bastani B (2004) The clinical course of patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome maintained on hemodialysis. Ren Fail 26, 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marik PE, Wood K, Starzl TE (2006) The course of type 1 hepato-renal syndrome post liver transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:478–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nair S, Verma S, Thuluvath PJ (2002) Pretransplant renal function predicts survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 35:1179–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arroyo V, Fernandez J, Ginès P (2008) Pathogenesis and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. Semin Liver Dis 28:81–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung der ethischen Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. Keine Angaben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Laudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huschak, G., Kaisers, U. & Laudi, S. Hepatorenales Syndrom. Anaesthesist 62, 571–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-013-2197-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-013-2197-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation