Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Drei Jahre Erfahrung

Fusionsbiopsie in der Praxis des niedergelassenen Urologen

  • Fortbildung
  • Published:
Uro-News Aims and scope

Die Einführung der Fusionsbiopsie bedeutet für eine Praxis wie auch für eine Klinik einen deutlichen finanziellen und personellen Mehraufwand. Die Anschaffung der Technologie lohnt sich aus wirtschaftlicher wie auch diagnostischer Sicht dennoch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2a
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie der Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V. S3-Leitlinie Prostatakarzinom 5.0. 2018; https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Prostata_5_0/LL_Prostata_Langversion_5.0.pdf

  2. Kasivisvanathan V. et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 1767–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed H.U. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017; 389: 815–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Faria R. et al. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS). Eur Urol. 2018; 73: 23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feutren T. et al. Prostate irradiation with focal dose escalation to the intraprostatic dominant nodule: a systematic review. Prostate Int. 2018; 6: 75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinreb J.C. et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 16–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sathianathen N.J. et al. Which scores need a core? An evaluation of MR-targeted biopsy yield by PIRADS score across different biopsy indications. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018

  8. Mathur S. et al. Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard. Abdom Radiol, 2018.

  9. Loeb S. et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013; 64: 876–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang H. et al. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy. BMC Urol. 2016; 16: 68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng X. et al. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection during 4 Years. J Urol. 2018

  12. Calio B. et al. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20: 436–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tadtayev S. et al. The association of level of practical experience in transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy with its diagnostic outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017; 99: 218–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. European Society of Urogenital Radiology. PIRADS vs2. 2018 Fri 20 Feb 2015; http://www.esur.org/fileadmin/content/user_upload/PIRADS_v2_20141223.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Draisstraße 2c, 91522, Ansbach, Deutschland

    Ulrich Köhl (Urologische Praxis Ansbach)

  2. http://www.springermedizin.de

    Daniel Rakowitz, Frank Emmert, Wolfgang Gelmetti & Valentina Câmpean-Hurdugaciu

Authors
  1. Ulrich Köhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Rakowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Emmert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wolfgang Gelmetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Valentina Câmpean-Hurdugaciu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Köhl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köhl, U., Rakowitz, D., Emmert, F. et al. Fusionsbiopsie in der Praxis des niedergelassenen Urologen. Uro-News 23, 28–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-019-2117-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-019-2117-1

Search

Navigation