Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The implementation of a clinical pathway enhancing early surgery for geriatric hip fractures: how to maintain a success story?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Timing of surgery in geriatric hip fracture treatment remains controversial. Early surgery is acknowledged as a quality indicator and NICE guidelines recommend surgery within 0–48 h from admission. In 2014 we implemented the indicator of early surgery in our institution, enhancing operative treatment within the next calendar day. We aimed to evaluate the implementation, define the room for improvement and provide strategies to maintain the quality indicator.

Methods

Clinical outcome of 744 patients (January 2011–December 2013) before early surgery was implemented, compared to 817 patients (June 2014–May 2017) after implementation of early surgery with a follow-up of 6 months. Data-analysis was done by Pearson’s Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Early surgery was achieved in 47.6% and 85.7% in the preimplementation and postimplementation group, respectively (P < 0.001). Both 30 days and 6 months mortality were similar (6.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.573 and 18.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.355, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter total length-of-stay (14 vs. 12 days, P < 0.001, preimplementation vs. postimplementation, respectively). Early surgery did not reduce the readmission rate.

Conclusions

The indicator of early surgery has been successfully implemented. Early surgery resulted in a significantly shorter LOS. No significant reduction in 30 days and 6 months mortality, and 90 days readmission was observed. To maintain early surgery, continuous engagement and monitoring is required by all shareholders involved and if necessary, adjustment of the clinical route is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the international osteoporosis foundation (IOF) and the European federation of pharmaceutical industry associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1–2):136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hours have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. De Palma R. Impact of multidisciplinary hip fracture program on timing of surgery in elderly patients. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(11):2591–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Orosz GM, Magaziner J, Hannan EL, et al. Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Librero J, Peiró S, Leutscher E, et al. Timing of surgery for hip fracture and in-hospital mortality: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the Spanish national health system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vidán MT, Sánchez E, Gracia Y, et al. Causes and effects of surgical delay in patients with hip fracture: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(4):226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Clinical Guideline Centre. (2011) (The management of hip fracture in adults). London: national clinical guideline centre. http://www.ncgc.ac.uk.

  8. Leung F, Lau TW, Kwan K, et al. Does timing of surgery matter in fragility hip fractures? Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(Suppl 4):529-34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hyholm AM, Gromov K, Palm H, et al. Time to surgery is associated with thirty-day and ninety-day mortality after proximale femur fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1333)9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pincus D, Ravi B, Wasserstein D, et al. Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA. 2017;318(20):1994–2003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. https://www.zorg-en-gezondheid.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/Rapport%20-%20Organisatie%20en%20structuren%20Kwaliteitsbeleid%20in%20Vlaanderen%202014.pdf.

  12. https://www.zorgkwaliteit.be.

  13. Basu N, Natour M, Mounasamy V, Kates SL. Geriatric hip fracture management: keys to providing a successful program. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:565–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubljanin-Raspopović E, Marković-Denić L, et al. Does early functional outcome predict 1-year mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2703–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Parker M, Johansen A. Hip fracture. BMJ. 2006;333(7557):27–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vidal EI, Coeli CM, Pinheiro RS, Camargo KR. Mortality within 1 year after hip fracture surgical repair in the elderly according to postoperative period: a probabilistic record linkage study in Brazil. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(10):1569–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smeets B, Nijs S, Nderlita M, Vandoren C, Hoekstra H. Health care usage and related costs in fibular pating for AO type 44-B ankle fractures in a Belgian university hospital: an exploratory analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 May-Jun;55(3):535–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sermon A, Flamaing J (sup.), Broos P (cosup.), Richards, R. (cosup.) (2014). Addressing the challenge of hip fracture fixation and prevention in old age—Preclinical and clinical studies assessing the osteoporotic femoral head, p 194 https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/467116/1/Manuscript_AnSermon.pdf.

  19. Cameron ID, Handoll HH, Finnegan TP, et al. Co-ordinated multidisciplinary approaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older patients with proximal femoral fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD000106.

  20. Oldmeadow LB, Edwards ER, Kimmel LA, et al. No rest for the wounded: early ambulation after hip surgery accelerates recovery. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):607–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kempenaers K, Van Calster B, Vandoren C, Sermon A, Metsemakers W-J, Vanderschot P, … Hoekstra H. (2018). Are the current guidelines for surgical delay in hip fractures too rigid? A single center assessment of mortality and economics. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harm Hoekstra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sermon, A., Rochus, I., Smeets, B. et al. The implementation of a clinical pathway enhancing early surgery for geriatric hip fractures: how to maintain a success story?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45, 199–205 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1034-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1034-4

Keywords

Navigation