Skip to main content
Log in

Intoxikation nach Frostschutzmittelaufnahme

Der Fall eines Patienten nach wiederholter Ethylenglykolintoxikation

Antifreeze poisoning

The case of a patient with repeated ethylene glycol poisoning

  • Kasuistiken
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 20 April 2021

This article has been updated

Zusammenfassung

Eine akzidentielle oder (para)suizidale Intoxikation mit Ethylenglykol kann zu einer schweren Acidose, zu verschiedenen Organsystemschäden und zum Tod führen. Wirksame Therapien stellen die Hämodialyse und die sofortige Gabe von Fomepizol bzw. von Ethanol dar. Wir beschreiben einen Patienten nach wiederholter Ethylenglykolintoxikation mit einer schweren metabolischen Acidose und einem akuten Nierenversagen. Durch Hämodialyse mit ethanolhaltigem Dialysat und i. v.-Gabe von Ethanol konnten wir gravierende Folgeschäden verhindern.

Abstract

Ethylene glycol poisoning of incidental or suicidal intention can cause life-threatening metabolic acidosis, diverse secondary damage, and even lead to death. Beside hemodialysis effective therapy consists of the administration of fomepizole and ethanol. We describe a patient after repeated ethylene glycol poisoning with high anion gap metabolic acidosis and acute renal failure. Using hemodialysis, with dialysate containing a specific amount of ethanol, and intravenous ethanol administration we were able to prevent severe secondary organ damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Change history

Literatur

  1. Bronstein AC, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR Jr. et al (2008) 2007 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 25th annual report. Clin Toxicol 46:927–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caravati EM, Erdman AR, Christianson G et al (2005) Ethylene glycol exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol 43:327–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choy KW, Wijeratne N, Lu ZX et al (2016) Harmonisation of osmolal gap – Can we use a common formula? Clin Biochem Rev 37:113–119

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Druteika DP, Zed PJ, Ensom MH (2002) Role of fomepizole in the management of ethylene glycol toxicity. Pharmacotherapy 22:365–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eder AF, Mcgrath CM, Dowdy YG et al (1998) Ethylene glycol poisoning: toxicokinetic and analytical factors affecting laboratory diagnosis. Clin Chem 44:168–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Froberg K, Dorion RP, Mcmartin KE (2006) The role of calcium oxalate crystal deposition in cerebral vessels during ethylene glycol poisoning. Clin Toxicol 44:315–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgman M, Marraffa JM, Wojcik S et al (2017) Serum calcium concentration in ethylene glycol poisoning. J Med Toxicol 13:153–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hovda KE, Julsrud J, Ovrebo S et al (2011) Studies on ethylene glycol poisoning: one patient – 154 admissions. Clin Toxicol 49:478–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. https://Secure.Giz-Nord.De/Cms/Images/Jabe/2016/Anhang1_Hh.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15.02.2018

  10. Khajuria A, Krahn J (2005) Osmolality revisited – deriving and validating the best formula for calculated osmolality. Clin Biochem 38:514–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kruse JA (2012) Methanol and ethylene glycol intoxication. Crit Care Clin 28:661–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mcmartin K (2009) Are calcium oxalate crystals involved in the mechanism of acute renal failure in ethylene glycol poisoning? Clin Toxicol 47:859–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mcquade DJ, Dargan PI, Wood DM (2014) Challenges in the diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Clin Biochem 51:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Megarbane B (2010) Treatment of patients with ethylene glycol or methanol poisoning: focus on fomepizole. Open Access Emerg Med 2:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Megarbane B, Borron SW, Baud FJ (2005) Current recommendations for treatment of severe toxic alcohol poisonings. Intensive Care Med 31:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendes EM, Meireles-Brandao L, Meira C et al (2018) Primary hypoparathyroidism presenting as basal ganglia calcification secondary to extreme hypocalcemia. Clin Pract 8:1007

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patocka J, Hon Z (2010) Ethylene glycol, hazardous substance in the household. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 53:19–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pons CA, Custer RP (1946) Acute ethylene glycol poisoning; a clinico-pathologic report of eighteen fatal cases. Am J Med Sci 211:544–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rietjens SJ, De Lange DW, Meulenbelt J (2014) Ethylene glycol or methanol intoxication: which antidote should be used, fomepizole or ethanol? Neth J Med 72:73–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riquier T, Geri G, Mongardon N et al (2014) False hyperlactatemia in life-threatening ethylene glycol poisoning. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 33:e79–e81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scalley RD, Ferguson DR, Piccaro JC et al (2002) Treatment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Am Fam Physician 66:807–812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugunaraj JP, Thakur LK, Jha KK et al (2017) Sequential episodes of ethylene glycol poisoning in the same person. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-220108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zakharov S, Pelclova D, Navratil T et al (2015) Fomepizole versus ethanol in the treatment of acute methanol poisoning: comparison of clinical effectiveness in a mass poisoning outbreak. Clin Toxicol 53:797–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Prinz.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Prinz, B. Böll, M. von Bergwelt-Baildon, V. Burst, J. U. Becker, D. Carvalho-Fiel, A. Shimabukuro-Vornhagen und M. Kochanek geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren. Alle Patienten, die über Bildmaterial oder anderweitige Angaben innerhalb des Manuskripts zu identifizieren sind, haben hierzu ihre schriftliche Einwilligung gegeben.

Additional information

Redaktion

R. Riessen, Tübingen

Die ursprüngliche Online-Version dieses Artikels wurde überarbeitet: Der Name des Autors M. von Bergwelt-Baildon wurde korrigiert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prinz, J., Böll, B., von Bergwelt-Baildon, M. et al. Intoxikation nach Frostschutzmittelaufnahme. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 114, 159–163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-018-0439-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-018-0439-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation