Effect of MRI-based semiautomatic size-assessment in cerebral metastases on the RANO-BM classification

Abstract

Aim

Evaluation of a semiautomatic software algorithm for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based assessment of cerebral metastases in cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Brain metastases (n = 131) in 38 patients, assessed by contrast-enhanced MRI, were retrospectively evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, follow-up) by two experienced neuroradiologists in a blinded manner. The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria for brain metastases (RANO-BM) were applied by means of a software (autoRANO-BM) as well as manually (manRANO-BM) at an interval of 3 weeks.

Results

The average diameter of metastases was 12.03 mm (SD ± 6.66 mm) for manRANO-BM and 13.97 mm (SD ± 7.76 mm) for autoRANO-BM. Diameter figures were higher when using semiautomatic measurements (median = 11.8 mm) as compared to the manual ones (median = 10.2 mm; p = 0.000). Correlation coefficients for intra-observer variability were 0.993 (autoRANO-BM) and 0.979 (manRANO-BM). The interobserver variability (R1/R2) was 0.936/0.965 for manRANO-BM and 0.989/0.998 for autoRANO-BM. A total of 19 lesions (15%) were classified differently when using semiautomatic measurements. In 14 cases with suspected disease progression by manRANO-BM a stable course was found according to autoRANO-BM.

Conclusion

Computerized measuring techniques can aid in the assessment of cerebral metastases by reducing examiner-dependent effects and may consequently result in a different classification according to RANO-BM criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, Barani IJ, Barboriak DP, Baumert BG, Bendszus M, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chang SM, Dancey J, de Vries EG, Gaspar LE, Harris GJ, Hodi FS, Kalkanis SN, Linskey ME, Macdonald DR, Margolin K, Mehta MP, Schiff D, Soffietti R, Suh JH, van den Bent MJ, Vogelbaum MA, Wen PY; Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: Proposal from the RANO Group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e270–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Radbruch A, Bendszus M. Advanced MR imaging in neuro-oncology. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25(Suppl 2):143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Suh JH. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of brain metastases. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1119–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Dicken V, Bornemann L, Bauknecht HC. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels—Intra scan and inter-scan analysis. Rofo. 2009;181:24–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hein PA, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klessen C, Lembcke A, Bornemann L, Dicken V, Hamm B, Bauknecht HC. Variability of semi automated lung nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose CT: Comparison with nodule volumetry on standard-dose CT. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23:8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Zidowitz S, Kuemmerlen B, Krass S, Peitgen HO, Wein BB, Schubert H, Shin HO, Wormanns D. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics. 2005;25:841–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L et al. Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25(4):417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    O JH, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A simplified guide to PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016;280:576–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Takimoto CH. Commentary: Tumor growth, patient survival, and the search for the optimal phase II efficacy endpoint. Oncologist. 2008;13:1043–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R, Batchelor TT, O’Neill AM, Hochberg FH, Levy B, Bradshaw J, Wen PY. Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2006;8:38-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klingelhöfer L, Mucha D, Geiger K, Koch R, von Kummer R. Prognostic value of conventional magnetic resonance imaging for adult patients with brain tumors. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25:281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee GS, Cho SJ, Kim JH, Park HK, Park SQ, Kim RS, Jang JC. Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of multisession radiosurgery to single dose radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2015;3:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Da Silva AN, Nagayama K, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP. Early brain tumor metastasis reduction following gamma knife surgery. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:547–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bauknecht HC, Romano VC, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Wolf C, Bornemann L, Hamm B, Hein PA. Intra- and interobserver variability of linear and volumetric measurements of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vogel MN, Vonthein R, Schmücker S, Maksimovich O, Bethge W, Dicken V, Claussen CD, Horger M. Automated pulmonary nodule volumetry with an optimized algorithm. Accuracy at different slice thicknesses compared to unidimensional and bidimensional measurements. Rofo. 2008;180:791–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gahrmann R, van den Bent M, van der Holt B, Vernhout RM, Taal W, Vos M, de Groot JC, Beerepoot LV, Buter J, Flach ZH, Hanse M, Jasperse B, Smits M. Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab—A report from the BELOB trial. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:853-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fabel M, Wulff A, Heckel F, Bornemann L, Freitag-Wolf S, Heller M, Biederer J, Bolte H. Clinical lymph node staging—Influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3124–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Huber T, Alber G, Bette S, Boeckh-Behrens T, Gempt J, Ringel F, Alberts E, Zimmer C, Bauer JS. Reliability of semi-automated segmentations in glioblastoma. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017;27:153–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Marten K, Auer F, Schmidt S, Kohl G, Rummeny EJ, Engelke C. Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:781–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    He L, Teng Y, Jin B, Zhao M, Yu P, Hu X, Zhang J, Li S, Gao Y, Liu Y. Initial partial response and stable disease according to RECIST indicate similar survival for chemotherapeutical patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:681.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Christian Bauknecht.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H.-C. Bauknecht, R. Klingebiel, P. Hein, C. Wolf, L. Bornemann, E. Siebert and G. Bohner declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

This study has been approved by the ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauknecht, H., Klingebiel, R., Hein, P. et al. Effect of MRI-based semiautomatic size-assessment in cerebral metastases on the RANO-BM classification. Clin Neuroradiol 30, 263–270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00785-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cerebral metastases
  • Semiautomatic measurement
  • RECIST
  • Response group
  • Radiooncological imaging