Transfemoral Approach for Intraoperative Angiography in the Prone or Three-quarter Prone Position

A Revisited Protocol for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation and Fistula Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Among the different arterial accesses, the femoral access is the main approach for intraoperative angiography (IOA) performed in a prone position. Without a standardized protocol, however, the application of prone IOAs in intracranial arteriovenous malformation (AVM) or arteriovenous fistula (AVF) surgery remains limited by its procedural complexity. This study describes the detailed protocol for prone IOA through a transfemoral approach and highlights several refinements in preparing this procedure.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the intracranial or high cervical AVM/AVF surgical cases in which both resection and IOA were performed in the prone or three-quarter prone position. Extended femoral sheath approaches and radiolucent head clamps were used in all cases. An aneurysm clip, serving as a localization landmark in IOA, was routinely placed within the surgical field. The IOA imaging, clinical impact of IOA, and complications related to the procedure were recorded.

Results

A total of six AVM and three AVF cases, operated on in the prone (n = 7) or three-quarter prone (n = 2) positions, were included. Multiple vessel injections were required in 66.7% of cases, and IOA was successfully performed in every intended vessel. All IOA images were adequate for interpretation, except for two cases in which the non-radiolucent component of the head clamp obscured the region of interest in the lateral views. Incomplete occlusion was identified in two patients, and the aneurysm clip provided precise guidance in localizing the residual nidus. Final IOA confirmed complete lesion removal in all cases, and there were no IOA-related complications.

Conclusion

Three key steps in setting-up a prone IOA procedure for intracranial AVM/AVF surgery are proposed: (1) utilize an extended femoral sheath approach, (2) establish a localization landmark with an aneurysm clip and (3) avoid possible image interference from the non-radiolucent component of the head clamp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Vitaz TW, Gaskill-Shipley M, Tomsick T, Tew JM Jr.. Utility, safety, and accuracy of intraoperative angiography in the surgical treatment of aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1457–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lang SS, Eskioglu E, Mericle RA. Intraoperative angiography for neurovascular disease in the prone or three-quarter prone position. Surg Neurol. 2006;65:283–9. discussion 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nossek E, Chalif DJ, Buciuc R, Gandras EJ, Anderer EG, Insigna S, Dehdashti AR, Setton A. Intraoperative angiography for arteriovenous malformation resection in the prone and lateral positions, using upper extremity arterial access. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017;13:352–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kotowski M, Sarrafzadeh A, Schatlo B, Boex C, Narata AP, Pereira VM, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Intraoperative angiography reloaded: a new hybrid operating theater for combined endovascular and surgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study on 25 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155:2071–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pandey P, Steinberg GK, Westbroek EM, Dodd R, Do HM, Marks MP. Intraoperative angiography for cranial dural arteriovenous fistula. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1091–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yoon W, Kim H, Kim YW, Kim SR, Park IS. Usefulness and stability of intraoperative digital subtraction angiography using the transradial route in arteriovenous malformation surgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;111:e799–e805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Orru E, Sorte DE, Wolinsky JP, Jallo GI, Bydon A, Tamargo RJ, Gailloud P. Intraoperative spinal digital subtraction angiography: indications, technique, safety, and clinical impact. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:601–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chalouhi N, Theofanis T, Jabbour P, Dumont AS, Fernando Gonzalez L, Starke RM, Dalyai RT, Hann S, Rosenwasser R, Tjoumakaris S. Safety and efficacy of intraoperative angiography in craniotomies for cerebral aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations: a review of 1093 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:1162–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huang CT, Hsu SK, Su IC. Accurate localization of aneurysm neck margins in clipping of a carotid cave aneurysm using intraoperative dual-volume 3‑dimensional volume-rendering rotational angiography. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:812 e11:e14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Haranhalli N, Zeberg H, Lasala P, Altschul D. Radiolucent Skull Clamps for Intra-Operative Imaging: A Technical Note. Cureus. 2017;9:e1020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chang Su.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Wang, S.-K. Hsu, C.-J. Chang, M.-H. Chen, C.-T. Huang, J.-S. Huang and I.-C. Su declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Hsu, S., Chang, C. et al. Transfemoral Approach for Intraoperative Angiography in the Prone or Three-quarter Prone Position. Clin Neuroradiol 30, 373–379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00783-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Arteriovenous fistula
  • Arteriovenous malformation
  • Intraoperative localization
  • Non-supine position
  • Hybrid operating room