coloproctology

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 127–129 | Cite as

Magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with fecal incontinence after failure of an implanted artificial bowel sphincter

Originalien
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has become an option in the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI). We decided to perform MSA in five patients after technical failure of a previously implanted artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). In short-term follow-up, MSA resolved FI in all five patients.

Keywords

Pelvic floor Quality of life Colorectal surgery Device Removal Anal Canal 

Implantation eines analen Magnetsphinkters bei Patienten mit Stuhlinkontinenz nach Funktionsverlust eines „artificial bowel sphincter“

Zusammenfassung

Die Implantation eines analen Magnetsphinkters („magnetic sphincter augmentation“, MSA) ist eine Option in der Behandlung der Stuhlinkontinenz. Die Autoren implantierten einen Magnetsphinkter bei 5 Patienten, bei denen ein zuvor implantierter ABS („artificial bowel sphincter“) insuffizient geworden war. Die kurzfristige Nachuntersuchung ergab, dass die Stuhlinkontinenz bei allen 5 Patienten wieder behoben wurde.

Schlüsselwörter

Beckenboden Lebensqualität Kolorektale Chirurgie Implantatentfernung Analkanal 

Notes

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

F. Pakravan has a consulting agreement with Torax Medical. C. Helmes and I. Alldinger declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants from whom identifying information is included in this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS et al (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137(2):512–7, 517.e1–2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Melega E, Rinaldi M (2001) Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88(11):1481–1486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL et al (2002) Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 45(9):1154–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lehur PA, Roig JV, Duinslaeger M (2000) Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 43(8):1100–1106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Neunlist M, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S (2002) Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 45(4):508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker SC, Spencer MP, Madoff RD, Jensen LL, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA (2003) Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 46(6):722–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruiz Carmona MD, Alos Company R, Roig Vila JV, Bueno SA, Pla MV (2009) Long-term results of artificial bowel sphincter for the treatment of severe faecal incontinence. Are they what we hoped for? Colorectal Dis 11(8):831–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, Glemain P, Lehur PA (2011) The artificial bowel sphincter: a single institution experience over a decade. Ann Surg 254(6):951–956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45(9):1139–1153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pakravan F, Helmes C (2015) Magnetic anal sphincter augmentation in patients with severe fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 58(1):109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saino G, Bonavina L, Lipham JC, Dunn D, Ganz RA (2015) Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux at 5 years: final results of a pilot study show long-term acid reduction and symptom improvement. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(10):787–792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barussaud ML, Mantoo S, Wyart V, Meurette G, Lehur PA (2013) The magnetic anal sphincter in faecal incontinence: is initial success sustained over time? Colorectal Dis 15(12):1499–1503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Coloproctology DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations