Literatur
Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1591–1605
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97
Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80
Paquette IM, Abodeely A, Johnson BL 3rd, Rafferty JF (2014) Quantifying patient improvement following sacral neuromodulation: is it time for a new scoring system for fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 57(10):1209–1212
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483
Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16
Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, Marosszeky N (2013) The revised faecal incontinence scale: a clinical validation of a new, short measure for assessment and outcomes evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):652–659
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
G. Kolbert gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolbert, G. Erfassen gängige Inkontinenzscores die tätsächliche Kontinenzsituation der Patienten?. coloproctology 39, 11–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-016-0130-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-016-0130-3