Skip to main content
Log in

Erfassen gängige Inkontinenzscores die tätsächliche Kontinenzsituation der Patienten?

Do Scores measure right in incontinent patients?

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1591–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Paquette IM, Abodeely A, Johnson BL 3rd, Rafferty JF (2014) Quantifying patient improvement following sacral neuromodulation: is it time for a new scoring system for fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 57(10):1209–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sansoni J, Hawthorne G, Fleming G, Marosszeky N (2013) The revised faecal incontinence scale: a clinical validation of a new, short measure for assessment and outcomes evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):652–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kolbert.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

G. Kolbert gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolbert, G. Erfassen gängige Inkontinenzscores die tätsächliche Kontinenzsituation der Patienten?. coloproctology 39, 11–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-016-0130-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-016-0130-3

Navigation