Abstract
In recent years, a large number of in silico and in vitro assays have been developed for safety assessment in early drug discovery. These methods are usually validated using datasets of known drugs with large chemical diversity, while application to homologous series has been rarely explored. Here we report a case study about phospholipidosis (PLD) risk evaluation for a dataset of nine compounds, designed and synthesized to modulate the physico-chemical properties typical of cationic amphiphilic compounds (CADs), representing the main class of PLD inducers. Our aim was to investigate the effect of structure modification on PLD induction according to a number of standard in silico and in vitro methods. As a result, we found that different in silico methods lead to conflicting results when applied to our series of weak PLD inducers, thus the apparently easy-to-use definition of CADs requires special attention. Moreover, when weak inducers are tested in vitro, the revealed PLD effect may vary based on the purity grade of the tested compound and the features of the selected assay. Finally, we have shown that slight modifications on a chemical scaffold can have an impact on the PLD effect. This study also exemplifies that current in silico methods possibly overestimate the PLD induction effect of cationic amphiphilic compounds compared to the in vitro, with the risk of discarding promising compounds based on incorrect safety liabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artese A, Cross S, Costa G, Distinto S, Parrotta L, Alcaro S, Ortuso F, Cruciani G (2013) Molecular interaction fields in drug discovery: recent advances and future perspectives. Wires Comput Mol Sci 3:594–613
Baroni M, Cruciani G, Sciabola S, Perruccio F, Mason JS (2007) A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for ligands and Proteins (FLAP): theory and application. J Chem Inf Model 47:279–294
Bhandari N, Figueroa DJ, Lawrence JW, Gerhold DL (2008) Phospholipidosis assay in HepG2 cells and rat or rhesus hepatocytes using phospholipid probe NBD-PE. Assay Drug Dev Technol 6:407–419
Blomme EA, Will Y (2016) Toxicology strategies for drug discovery: present and future. Chem Res Toxicol 29:473–504
Chapy H, Goracci L, Vayer P, Parmentier Y, Carrupt PA, Decleves X, Scherrmann JM, Cisternino S, Cruciani G (2015) Pharmacophore-based discovery of inhibitors of a novel drug/proton antiporter in human brain endothelial hCMEC/D3 cell line. Br J Pharmacol 172:4888–4904
Chatman LA, Morton D, Johnson TO, Anway SD (2009) A strategy for risk management of drug-induced phospholipidosis. Toxicol Pathol 37:997–1005
Choi SS, Kim JS, Valerio LG, Sadrieh N (2013) In silico modeling to predict drug-induced phospholipidosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 269:195–204
Cross S, Baroni M, Goracci L, Cruciani G (2012a) GRID-based three-dimensional pharmacophores I: FLAPpharm, a novel approach for pharmacophore elucidation. J Chem Inf Model 52:2587–2598
Cross S, Ortuso F, Baroni M, Costa G, Distinto S, Moraca F, Alcaro S, Cruciani G (2012b) GRID-based three-dimensional pharmacophores II: PharmBench, a benchmark data set for evaluating pharmacophore elucidation methods. J Chem Inf Model 52:2599–2608
Cruciani G, Crivori P, Carrupt PA, Testa B (2000) Molecular fields in quantitative structure–permeation relationships: the VolSurf approach. J Mol Struct 503:17–30
Cruciani G, Milletti F, Storchi L, Sforna G, Goracci L (2009) In silico pKa prediction and ADME profiling. Chem Biodivers 6:1812–1821
DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A (2010) Pharmaceutical innovation in the 21st century: new drug approvals in the first decade, 2000–2009. Clin Pharmacol 87:272–277
Fischer H, Atzpodien EA, Csato M, Doessegger L, Lenz B, Schmitt G, Singer T (2012) In silico assay for assessing phospholipidosis potential of small druglike molecules: training, validation, and refinement using several data sets. J Med Chem 55:126–139
Goracci L, Ceccarelli M, Bonelli D, Cruciani (2013) Modeling phospholipidosis induction: reliability and warnings. J Chem Inf Model 53:1436–1446
Goracci L, Buratta S, Urbanelli L, Ferrara G, Di Guida R, Emiliani C, Cross S (2015) Evaluating the risk of phospholipidosis using a new multidisciplinary pipeline approach. Eur J Med Chem 92:49–63
Halliwell WH (1997) Cationic amphiphilic drug-induced phospholipidosis. Toxicol Pathol 25:53–60
Hanumegowda UM, Wenke G, Regueiro-Ren A, Yordanova, Corradi JP, Adams SP (2010) Phospholipidosis as a function of basicity, lipophilicity, and volume of distribution of compounds. Chem Res Toxicol 23:749–755
Ikeda K, Hirayama M, Hirota Y, Asa E, Seki J, Tanaka Y (2008) Drug-induced phospholipidosis is caused by blockade of mannose 6-phosphate receptor-mediated targeting of lysosomal enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 377:268–274
Ivanciuc O (2008) Weka machine learning for predicting the phospholipidosis inducing potential. Curr Top Med Chem 8:1691–1709
Kasahara T, Tomita K, Murano H, Harada, Tsubakimoto K, Ogihara T, Ohnishi S, Kakinuma C (2006) Establishment of an in vitro high-throughput screening assay for detecting phospholipidosis-inducing potential. Toxicol Sci 90:133–141
Kazmi F, Hensley T, Pope C, Funk RS, Loewen GJ, Buckley DB, Parkinson A (2013) Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells). Drug Metab Dispos 41:897–905
Kodavanti UP, Mehendale HM (1990) Cationic amphiphilic drugs and phospholipid storage disorder. Pharmacol Rev 42:327–354
Kruhlak NL, Choi SS, Contrera JF, Weaver JL, Willard JM, Hastings KL, Sancilio LF (2008) Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:217–227
Lepri S, Nannetti G, Muratore G, Cruciani G, Ruzziconi R, Mercorelli B, Palu G, Loregian A, Goracci L (2014) Optimization of small-molecule inhibitors of influenza virus polymerase: from thiophene-3-carboxamide to polyamido scaffolds. J Med Chem 57:4337–4350
Lowe R, Mussa HY, Nigsch F, Glen RC, Mitchell JB (2012) Predicting the mechanism of phospholipidosis. J Cheminform 4:2
Lullmann H, Lullmann-Rauch R, Wassermann O (1975) Drug-induced phospholipidoses. II. Tissue distribution of the amphiphilic drug chlorphentermine. Crit Rev Toxicol 4:185–218
Mannhold R, Berellini G, Carosati E, Benedetti P (2006) AOME properties and their prediction major causes for failure in drug development are unsuitable pharmacokinetic properties of drug candidates including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), which were traditionally measured at rather late stages of drug development. Nowadays, the testing of ADME properties is done much earlieri. In: Cruciani G (ed) Molecular interaction fields: applications in drug discovery and ADME prediction. Wiley-VCH, New York, 2006, vol. 27 173–196
Milletti F, Storchi L, Goracci L, Bendels S, Wagner B, Kansy M, Cruciani G (2010) Extending pKa prediction accuracy: high-throughput pKa measurements to understand pKa modulation of new chemical series. Eur J Med Chem 45:4270–4279
Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Tulkens PM (1999) Aminoglycosides: nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1003–1012
Molecular Discovery Ltd. http://www.moldiscovery.com/. Accessed 11 Feb 2016
Muehlbacher M, Tripal P, Roas F, Kornhuber J (2012) Identification of drugs inducing phospholipidosis by novel in vitro data. ChemMedChem 7:1925–1934
Munic V, Banjanac M, Kostrun S, Nujic K, Bosnar M, Marjanovic N, Ralic J, Matijasic M, Hlevnjak M, Erakovic Haber V (2011) Intensity of macrolide anti-inflammatory activity in J774A.1 cells positively correlates with cellular accumulation and phospholipidosis. Pharmacol Res 64:298–307
Nadanaciva S, Lu S, Gebhard DF, Jessen BA, Pennie WD, Will Y (2011) A high content screening assay for identifying lysosomotropic compounds. Toxicol In Vitro 25:715–723
Nonoyama T, Fukuda R (2008) Drug-induced phospholipidosis: Pathological aspects and its prediction. J Toxicol Pathol 21:9–24
Orogo AM, Choi SS, Minnier BL, Kruhlak NL (2012) Construction and consensus performance of (Q)SAR models for predicting phospholipidosis using a dataset of 743 compounds. Mol Inf 31:725–739
Pelletier DJ, Gehlhaar D, Tilloy-Ellul, Johnson TO, Greene (2007) Evaluation of a published in silico model and construction of a novel Bayesian model for predicting phospholipidosis inducing potential. J Chem Inf Model 47:1196–1205
Ploemen JP, Kelder J, Hafmans T, van de Sandt H, van Burgsteden JA, Salemink PJ, van Esch E (2004) Use of physicochemical calculation of pKa and CLogP to predict phospholipidosis-inducing potential: a case study with structurally related piperazines. Exp Toxicol Pathol 55:347–355
Quaglino D, Ha HR, Duner E, Bruttomesso D, Bigler L, Follath F, Realdi G, Pettenazzo A, Baritussio A (2004) Effects of metabolites and analogs of amiodarone on alveolar macrophages: structure-activity relationship. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287:L438–L447
Reasor MJ, Hastings KL, Ulrich RG (2006) Drug-induced phospholipidosis: issues and future directions. Expert Opin Drug Saf 5:567–583
Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL (2008) Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nat Protoc 3:1125–1131
Sirci F, Goracci L, Rodriguez D, an Muijlwijk-Koezen J, Gutierrez-de-Teran H, Mannhold R (2012) Ligand-, structure- and pharmacophore-based molecular fingerprints: a case study on adenosine A(1), A (2A), A (2B), and A (3) receptor antagonists. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26:1247–1266
Slavov SH, Wilkes JG, Buzatu DA, Kruhlak NL, Willard JM, Hanig JP, Beger RD (2014) Computational identification of a phospholipidosis toxicophore using (13)C and (15)N NMR-distance based fingerprints. Bioorg Med Chem 22:6706–6714
SPECS. http://www.specs.net/. Accessed 18 Dec 2015
Sun H, Shahane S, Xia M, Austin CP, Huang R (2012) Structure based model for the prediction of phospholipidosis induction potential of small molecules. J Chem Inf Model 52:1798–1805
Tomizawa K, Sugano K, Yamada H, Horii I (2006) Physicochemical and cell-based approach for early screening of phospholipidosis-inducing potential. J Toxicol Sci 31:315–324
Tondi D, Cross S, Venturelli A, Costi M, Cruciani G, Spyrakis F (2016) Decoding the structural basis for carbapenem hydrolysis by class A β-lactamases: fishing for a pharmacophore. Curr Drug Targets 17:983–1005
van de Water FM, Havinga, Ravesloot WT, Horbach GJ, Schoonen WG (2011) High content screening analysis of phospholipidosis: validation of a 96-well assay with CHO-K1 and HepG2 cells for the prediction of in vivo based phospholipidosis. Toxicol In Vitro 25:1870–1882
Waring MJ, Arrowsmith J, Leach AR, Leeson PD, Mandrell S, Owen RM, Pairaudeau G, Pennie WD, Pickett SD, Wang J, Wallace O, Weir A (2015) An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:475–486
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. Francesco Galli for generously sharing his laboratory facilities for biological analysis, and Dr. Simon Cross for helpful comments and for English revision. Financial support from the Italian MIUR within the “FIRB-Futuro in Ricerca 2010” Program—Project RBFR10×500 is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Susan Lepri and Aurora Valeri contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lepri, S., Valeri, A., Buratta, S. et al. Synthesis and phospholipidosis effect of a series of cationic amphiphilic compounds: a case study to evaluate in silico and in vitro assays. Med Chem Res 27, 679–692 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-2093-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-2093-5