Abstract
Many radar detection algorithms that assume a stationary environment (clutter) have been proposed and analyzed over the years. However, in practice, changes in the nonstationary environment can perturb the parameters of the clutter distribution, or even alter the clutter distribution family, which can greatly deteriorate the target detection capability. To avoid such potential performance degradation, cognitive radar systems are envisioned which are required to rapidly realize the nonstationarity, accurately learn the new characteristics of the environments, and adaptively update the detector. In this paper, aiming to develop a fully cognitive radar for target detection in nonstationary environments, we propose a unifying framework that integrates (i) change-point detection of clutter distributions by using a data-driven cumulative sum (CUSUM) algorithm and its extended version, (ii) learning/identification of clutter distribution by applying sparse theory and kernel density estimation methods, and (iii) adaptive target detection by automatically modifying the likelihood-ratio test and corresponding detection threshold. Further, with extensive numerical examples, we demonstrate the achieved improvements in detection performance due to the proposed framework in comparison with a nonadaptive case, an adaptive matched filter method, and the clairvoyant case. We also use Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to evaluate the statistical significance of the performance improvements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Akcakaya, S. Sen, A. Nehorai, A novel data-driven learning method for radar target detection in nonstationary environments. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 23(5), 762–766 (2016)
M. Basseville, I.V. Nikiforov et al., Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application, vol. 104 (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993)
K.L. Bell, C.J. Baker, G.E. Smith, J.T. Johnson, M. Rangaswamy, Cognitive radar framework for target detection and tracking. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 9(8), 1427–1439 (2015)
P. Chen, W.L. Melvin, M. Wicks, Screening among multivariate normal data. J. Multivariate Anal. 69(1), 10–29 (1999)
E. Conte, A. De Maio, C. Galdi, Statistical analysis of real clutter at different range resolutions. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst. 40(3), 903–918 (2004)
G. Cui, L. Kong, X. Yang, GLRT-based detection algorithm for polarimetric MIMO radar against sirv clutter. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 31(3), 1033–1048 (2012)
J. DiFranco, W. Rubin, Radar Detection (SciTech Publishing Inc, Raleigh, 2004)
A. Farina, A. Russo, F. Studer, Coherent radar detection in log-normal clutter, in IEE Proceedings F-Communications, Radar and Signal Processing, vol. 133, pp. 39–53. IET (1986)
J.D. Gibbons, S. Chakraborti, Nonparametric Statistical Inference (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Cambridge, 2011)
F. Gini, M. Greco, M. Diani, L. Verrazzani, Performance analysis of two adaptive radar detectors against non-Gaussian real sea clutter data. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 36(4), 1429–1439 (2000)
J.R. Guerci, E.J. Baranoski, Knowledge-aided adaptive radar at DARPA: an overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 23(1), 41–50 (2006)
J.R. Guerci, R.M. Guerci, M. Rangaswamy, J. Bergin, M. Wicks, CoFAR: cognitive fully adaptive radar, in IEEE Radar Conference, pp. 0984–0989 (2014)
S. Haykin, Cognitive radar: a way of the future. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 23(1), 30–40 (2006)
S. Haykin, D.J. Thomson, Signal detection in a nonstationary environment reformulated as an adaptive pattern classification problem. Proc. IEEE 86(11), 2325–2344 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726792
S.M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Vol: II Detection Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1998)
M. Kelsey, S. Sen, Y. Xiang, A. Nehorai, M. Akcakaya, Sparse recovery for clutter identification in radar measurements. Proc. SPIE 1021106, 1–10 (2017)
K. Krishnamoorthy, Handbook of Statistical Distributions with Applications (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Cambridge, 2006)
G. Lorden et al., Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 42(6), 1897–1908 (1971)
H.B. Mann, D.R. Whitney, On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50–60 (1947)
W. Melvin, J. Guerci, Knowledge-aided signal processing: a new paradigm for radar and other advanced sensors. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 42(3), 983–996 (2006)
J. Metcalf.: Signal processing for non-Gaussian statistics: clutter distribution identification and adaptive threshold estimation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kansas (2015)
J. Metcalf, S. Blunt, B. Himed, A machine learning approach to distribution identification in non-Gaussian clutter, in IEEE Radar Conference, pp. 0739–0744 (2014)
G.V. Moustakides et al., Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. Ann. Stat. 14(4), 1379–1387 (1986)
A. Ozturk, An application of a distribution identification algorithm to signal detection problems, in Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, pp. 248–252 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1993.342510
M. Pollak, Optimal detection of a change in distribution. Ann. Stat. 13, 206–227 (1985)
M. Rangaswamy, D.D. Weiner, A. Ozturk, Non-Gaussian random vector identification using spherically invariant random processes. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 29(1), 111–124 (1993)
M.A. Richards, Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing (Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2005)
M. Sekine, T. Musha, Y. Tomita, T. Hagisawa, T. Irabu, E. Kiuchi, On Weibull-distributed weather clutter. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 15, 824–830 (1979)
G. Sun, Z. He, Y. Zhang, Distributed airborne MIMO radar detection in compound-Gaussian clutter without training data. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 37(10), 4617–4636 (2018)
V.V. Veeravalli, T. Banerjee, in Academic Press Library in Signal Processing, ed. by A.M. Zoubir, M. Viberg, R. Chellappa, S. Theodoridis. Quickest change detection, vol 3 (Elsevier, Oxford, UK and Waltham, MA, USA, 2014), pp. 209–255
H. Wang, Y. Xiang, E. Dagois, M. Kelsey, S. Sen, A. Nehorai, M. Akcakaya, Clutter identification based on kernel density estimation and sparse recovery. Proc. SPIE 10658, 1–10 (2018)
J. Wang, A. Dogandzic, A. Nehorai, Maximum likelihood estimation of compound-Gaussian clutter and target parameters. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54(10), 3884–3898 (2006)
P. Wang, H. Li, B. Himed, Bayesian parametric GLRT for knowledge-aided space-time adaptive processing, in IEEE Radar Conference, pp. 329–332 (2011)
P. Wang, H. Li, B. Himed, Knowledge-aided parametric tests for multichannel adaptive signal detection. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59(12), 5970–5982 (2011)
P. Wang, H. Li, Z. Wang, B. Himed, Knowledge-aided parametric adaptive matched filter with automatic combining for covariance estimation, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 6067–6071 (2014)
P. Wang, Z. Sahinoglu, M.O. Pun, H. Li, B. Himed, Knowledge-aided adaptive coherence estimator in stochastic partially homogeneous environments. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 18(3), 193–196 (2011)
S. Watts, Radar detection prediction in K-distributed sea clutter and thermal noise. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES–23(1), 40–45 (1987)
Y. Xiang, M. Kelsey, H. Wang, S. Sen, M. Akcakaya, A. Nehorai, A comparison of cognitive approaches for clutter-distribution identification in nonstationary environments, in IEEE Radar Conference, pp. 0467–0472 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by AFOSR under Grant No. FA9550-16-1-0386. The work of Sen was performed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Proof of \(\hat{t}_{\text {AMF}}\sim F(2, 2LN)\) under the null hypothesis
First, under the null hypothesis,
Further, because \(\varvec{y}_0^{(k)H}\varvec{1}\sim \mathcal {CN}(0, N\sigma ^2)\), we have
Note that \(\varvec{1}^H\varvec{1}=N\), thus, we have
where the right-hand side coincides with definition of an F-distribution, because these two \(\chi ^2\)-distributions are independent due to the independence of the data in the CUT and the secondary data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiang, Y., Akcakaya, M., Sen, S. et al. Target Detection via Cognitive Radars Using Change-Point Detection, Learning, and Adaptation. Circuits Syst Signal Process 40, 233–261 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-020-01465-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-020-01465-z